8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

10/28/2026

Macquarie Plans Full Tender Offers for Gabia and KINX

Business Korea (10/28/26) Seon-young, Park

Macquarie Asset Management Group is moving to acquire South Korean internet infrastructure company Gabia (KOSDAQ: 079940) and its listed subsidiary KINX (KOSDAQ: 093320) simultaneously, with plans to take both companies private. Unlike the initial tender offer, which failed in September due to insufficient shareholder participation, the latest deal follows a price agreement with major shareholders, including Align Partners, with the same terms to be offered to minority shareholders. According to investment banking (IB) industry sources and Align Partners on Oct. 28, Macquarie Asia-Pacific Infrastructure Fund 4 (MAIF4) has signed a share purchase agreement (SPA) with Gabia's management and major shareholders. The acquisition price for Gabia has been raised by approximately 10.4% from the previous offer to 53,000 won, or approximately $39.68, per share. The parties have also agreed to launch a tender offer for all outstanding shares of KINX, which was excluded from the initial transaction, at 190,000 won per share. The key feature of the agreement is its commitment to protecting minority shareholders who could otherwise be excluded during a change of control. Align Partners stipulated that the launch of tender offers for all remaining shares of both companies must be a condition precedent to closing the transaction. Accordingly, Macquarie plans to purchase all shares tendered by minority shareholders at the same prices offered to major shareholders, without imposing a limit on the number of shares accepted. The parent-subsidiary double-listing issue, which arises when both a parent company and its subsidiary are publicly listed, is also expected to be resolved. Taking both Gabia and KINX private would simplify their ownership structure, facilitating long-term investment and faster decision-making. Align Partners CEO Lee Chang-hwan described the agreement as a mutually beneficial model that would guarantee minority shareholders equal opportunities to sell their shares while resolving the double-listing issue. Macquarie intends to continue drawing on the expertise of the existing management team following the acquisition. Gabia CEO Kim Hong-guk and other executives will reinvest part of their sale proceeds through in-kind contributions to the special purpose company (SPC) established for the acquisition. This arrangement will allow management to remain invested alongside Macquarie, share in future value creation and continue running the business. Verena Lim, Macquarie Group's Asia CEO, said the transaction would provide all shareholders with a meaningful premium and liquidity. She added that Macquarie would draw on its experience in global digital infrastructure to support the growth of Gabia and KINX. Government approvals remain pending before the transaction can be completed. Macquarie must obtain clearance through a foreign investment security review by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, as well as merger approval from the Korea Fair Trade Commission. The tender offers are scheduled to begin within 10 business days after these conditions precedent have been satisfied. Meanwhile, Gabia announced that it would raise fees for major domain services by up to 4.8% starting Nov. 1, citing increased operating costs. As news of the fee increase coincided with the tender offer agreement, shares of both Gabia and KINX surged more than 27% in early trading on Oct. 28.

Read the article

10/28/2026

Korea to Pay Elliott $48.49 Million Plus Interest Over Samsung Merger Dispute

Korea JoongAng Daily (10/28/26) Gu-Seul, Jang

The Korean government has conceded in an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) case with the U.S. private equity firm Elliott Management over the 2015 merger of two Samsung (KRX: 005930) affiliates. The government has decided not to seek to overturn an arbitration ruling issued on Sept. 30 in the rehearing of the ISDS case brought by Elliott over the government's involvement in the merger of Samsung C&T (KRX: 028260) and Cheil Industries, according to the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday. The decision leaves the government liable for approximately $48.49 million in damages, plus interest and other costs. Elliott initiated ISDS proceedings against Seoul in 2018 under the Korea-U.S. FTA. The private equity firm, a Samsung C&T shareholder at the time, claimed it suffered losses after the presidential office and the Ministry of Health and Welfare improperly pressured the National Pension Service (NPS) to vote in favor of the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries. In June 2023, an arbitration tribunal administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration accepted Elliott's claims and found the Korean government liable for approximately $48.49 million in damages, plus interest. The government subsequently filed a lawsuit in July of that year seeking to overturn the ruling in a British court, as the arbitration was seated in London. A British court dismissed the government's suit in August 2024, but the British Court of Appeal upheld the government's appeal in July 2025 and remanded the case to the lower court. In February this year, the lower court accepted the government's argument that the NPS could not be considered a state agency and partially overturned the original ruling. The court then referred the case back to the arbitration tribunal. Neither the Korean government nor Elliott appealed the decision, and the original arbitration tribunal reheard the case. However, the tribunal again ruled against the government, finding a causal link between the government's intervention and the losses suffered by Elliott. Just over seven months after securing a partial victory in its lawsuit, the government once again faces the same amount of compensation as in the original arbitration ruling.

Read the article

10/26/2026

Universal Music Discussed Going Private With Buyout Firms

Bloomberg (10/26/26) Shaw, Lucas; Davis, Michelle

Universal Music Group (AMS: UMG), the world’s largest record company, has discussed going private with a few prominent Wall Street firms, according to people familiar with the matter. Universal’s management held preliminary conversations with private equity firms including Apollo Global Management Inc., TPG Inc. and Blackstone Inc. earlier this year, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the talks were confidential. The board of the company, with a market value of €29 billion ($32 billion), is aware of the discussions, they added. The conversations haven’t progressed nor has Universal, home to acts including Taylor Swift, The Weeknd and Kendrick Lamar, begun a sales process, the people said. The company declined to comment, as did the private equity firms. Universal’s sagging share price has prompted many at the company and on Wall Street to wonder whether the music giant would be better off as a private firm. Shares in Universal rose as much as 6% in Amsterdam trading on Tuesday, the biggest intraday gain since April. The stock has declined about 27% this year and trades below the price at which the company first went public in 2021. Catalogs and other music assets are trading at much higher multiples than Universal and rival Warner Music Group on the private market. Universal, led by Chief Executive Officer Lucian Grainge, was already the option of one takeover attempt this year when shareholder Bill Ackman made an offer to buy the Amsterdam-listed company and move its listing to the United States. Universal rejected the bid, but the company’s largest shareholder agreed with Ackman that the firm is undervalued. Universal is the largest and most successful of the three major record label groups, the distributor of nine of the 10 best-selling acts in the world last year. Sony Group Corp. is another major competitor. “We think that the price is not right at all,” Cyrille Bollore, whose family owns a 30% stake in Universal Music Group, said at his firm’s shareholder meeting in May. Bollore praised Universal as one of his family’s best investments and a hedge against an economic downturn. “Perhaps we’ll sell a few percent one day. We’ll see. But we can’t sell too early.” Any deal would require the assent of the Bollore family, which owns more than 30% of the firm between the personal holdings of Vincent Bollore, Cyrille’s father, and Vivendi (PA: VIV), their media company. Vivendi used to own Universal Music before the company was spun out as a separate public company. The Bollores haven’t signaled interest in selling their full position. Nor has Chinese internet giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. (OTCMKTS: TCEHY), which owns more than 11%. Taking Universal public was lucrative for the Bollores and a handful of senior leaders who had stock. The company has since struggled to satisfy investors. Record labels have surrendered market share to independent distributors offering more artist-friendly terms. The streaming market that boosted sales for the last decade has slowed in the United States and Western Europe over the last couple of years. The fastest-growing markets are in Latin America and Asia, regions where the major record labels are less dominant. The biggest drag on the stock of Universal and Warner Music (NASDAQ: WMG) has been anxiety about artificial intelligence. AI has produced a surge in the number of songs getting uploaded to streaming services, which analysts and investors fear will dilute the labels’ share of listening and earnings. Grainge has said Universal isn’t at risk of dilution. “We anticipated the rise of AI slop and we anticipated the potential for fraud,” Grainge said on a call with analysts in July. “Music platforms should reward creativity and guard against illegally trained AI models pumping AI slop or fraud designed to divert royalties from artists, songwriters, labels and music publishers.” Universal has expressed concern about AI companies violating its copyrights, as file-sharing websites did during the internet boom. Universal sued Suno, the largest AI music company, as well as Anthropic.

Read the article

10/26/2026

Fitzwalter Capital Revives Auction Technology Campaign

City AM (10/26/26) Lyon, Ali

Fitzwalter Capital, Auction Technology Group’s (LON: ATG) largest shareholder, has revived its campaign to overhaul the online auction platform’s leadership, calling for chairman Scott Forbes to be removed and replaced by its nominee, Richard Campbell-Breeden. Fitzwalter wants the new chair to launch an independent strategic review examining options including a share buyback or a potential sale. Shareholders will vote on the proposals at a general meeting. The move comes six months after Fitzwalter abandoned its attempt to acquire ATG following nearly a dozen rejected bids. ATG previously argued that Fitzwalter’s final offer, which implied a 33% premium, significantly undervalued the business. Fitzwalter now says Forbes has overseen five years of value destruction and argues shareholders should determine the company’s future. ATG shares have fallen more than 65% over five years, amid difficulties integrating loss-making U.S. rival Chairish. Fitzwalter says it would not bid for ATG itself if the strategic review led to a sale, but would support any offer the board recommends. The investor also says it would not pursue a sale unless proposals delivered appropriate value. Campbell-Breeden, a former investment banker at Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Julius Baer, says he would act independently and ensure the review remains rigorous, open-minded and focused on achieving the best outcome for ATG and all shareholders.

Read the article

10/26/2026

Vail Resorts Raises Conflict-of-Interest Questions Over Matthew Prince’s Links to Oasis Board Nominees

Snow Brains (10/26/26) Smith, Luke

The ongoing Vail Resorts (NYSE: MTN) proxy battle has pulled Park City billionaire and Cloudflare Founder/CEO Matthew Prince directly into the fight once again. Vail filed its PREC14A with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in which it suggested Prince was helping Oasis Management identify two of its four board nominees in order to form a board aligned with his goal of buying Park City Mountain. The report specifically mentions Olympic skier and Park City resident Picabo Street and Utah businessman Bryce Roberts. Both nominees disclosed the contact they had with Prince. Street consulted with Prince about her nomination. Roberts said that Prince introduced him to Oasis. Vail’s proxy filing explicitly asks shareholders to vote against the Oasis nominees, and vote for its nine incumbent directors at the December meeting. Prince acknowledges suggesting the potential candidates to Oasis via email, but denies having influence over the nominees. The dispute is significant as Prince has spent more than a year mounting a public pressure campaign to attempt to acquire Park City Mountain from Vail Resorts. Vail’s board recommended that shareholders reject all four Oasis nominees. As of today, Oasis currently owns 9.6% of Vail Shares, which is a major escalation from the 6.2% stake it disclosed when it launched the proxy fight in September. Prince is one of the voices expressing support for major changes at Vail Resorts. Vail has defended its strategy and argued that its initiatives are improving the company’s performance. A decision will be made when Vail holds its 2026 annual meeting, where shareholders will vote on board members for the next year. As of now, the meeting date has not been finalized. The outcome of the proxy battle could shape Vail Resorts’ leadership and its response to growing pressure from investors and critics of its resort strategy. However, even if Oasis secures board representation, the vote will not determine whether Park City Mountain is sold to Prince. That would require a separate decision by Vail Resorts. For now, shareholders will decide whether Oasis’s proposed directors offer a better path forward than the company’s incumbent leadership, with the annual meeting date still to be announced.

Read the article