4/10/2026

South Korea Vows Clean Break from Era of State-Chaebol Collusion

Nikkei Asia (04/10/26) Jaewon, Kim

South Korea's justice minister said the era of close ties between the government and the country's strong family-run conglomerates, known as chaebol, has effectively ended. "[South Korea] is not a country where the government and the market are so closely intertwined that the government can manipulate businesses at will. Under the Lee Jae Myung administration, they are completely separate," Justice Minister Jung Sung-ho said in an interview with Nikkei Asia and other media in his office in Gwacheon, south of Seoul, on Thursday. His comments come as Seoul seeks to reassure global investors while preparing for a renewed legal battle with U.S. private equity firm Elliott Investment Management over the 2015 merger of Samsung (KRX: 005930) affiliates. The five-term lawmaker of the ruling Democratic Party and a lifelong friend of President Lee pointed to greater transparency and institutional checks that make government interference in corporate decisions far harder than in the past. "Everything is now being made public. How the president, as the nation's highest representative and leader, makes decisions on issues like this ... How the relevant ministries' policies are formulated based on those decisions, and how those specific policies are being implemented." Jung pointed to weekly cabinet meetings being aired live to the public, as a way of letting both South Korean nationals and foreign investors understand the country's policy direction transparently. South Korea is facing a reopened investor-state dispute with Elliott over the Samsung merger, after a British court in February overturned a previous $117 million international arbitration award to the hedge fund and remanded the case to the tribunal for further proceedings. Elliott, which had a 7.1% stake in Samsung C&T (KRX: 028260), opposed its merger with Cheil Industries, arguing the deal undervalued Samsung C&T and unfairly benefited the founding Lee family's control over the group. The hedge fund later filed an investor-state claim, alleging that government influence -- including pressure on the National Pension Service which had a 11.2% stake in Samsung C&T -- contributed to the merger's approval and caused the company more than 1 trillion won (about $675 million) in financial losses. While it is hard to predict when Seoul's legal dispute with Elliott will end, the U.S. government is also pressuring the South Korean government over trade and human rights issues.

Read the article

4/10/2026

Impactive Aims to Replace WEX CEO on Board in Proxy Fight, Sources Say

Reuters (04/10/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Impactive Capital is urging WEX (WEX.N) shareholders to replace the company's long-serving CEO on its board of directors at next month's annual meeting as the investor presses on with a board challenge, according to sources and documents seen by Reuters. The hedge fund is also telling the information management services company's investors it is not aware of looming regulatory snags that could trip up its proxy fight, addressing a potentially critical issue the company raised last month. Impactive owns roughly 5% of WEX's shares. Impactive wants to replace three sitting directors, including CEO Melissa Smith, who also serves as board chair, the documents show. The hedge fund is not pushing to oust Smith as CEO but rather to replace her on the board and to split the CEO and chair roles, which are combined at many companies, the sources said and the documents show. The sources are not permitted to discuss the hedge fund's plans publicly. The hedge fund blames Smith for the company's lagging share price, says her pay is too high and considers the board's governance record poor, the documents show. The hedge fund argues WEX shares have trailed primary competitors Corpay (NYSE: CPAY) and HealthEquity (NASDAQ: HQY) and the S&P Mid-Cap Index since Smith became chair in September 2019. During the same period, WEX's market value, now $5.5 billion, has fallen in half, losing shareholders $3.4 billion in value, the hedge fund said. WEX's share price has climbed 28% in the last 12 months. WEX is primarily focused on fleet management, corporate payments, and employee benefits. Its board and management team have considered Impactive's input on strategy, capital allocation, and board composition, Reuters previously reported. A WEX representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment. WEX owns and operates WEX Bank, a Utah-based industrial-chartered bank, and is therefore regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (UDFI). Impactive also wants to remove WEX director Stephen Smith, who the fund says was partly responsible for rising management compensation, and Nancy Altobello, who it blames for allowing the CEO to keep her role as board chair even amid underperformance. Instead, the firm is urging shareholders to elect technology and payments executive Kurt Adams, veteran financial services executive Ellen Alemany and Lauren Taylor Wolfe, one of Impactive's co-founders. Impactive has spent months preparing for what is shaping up to be one of the year's most closely watched and bitter board fights, which is expected to be decided at the May 5 annual meeting. The hedge fund noted investors had already soured on the CEO last year when Smith received only 64.3% of support from shareholders, dropping from 97.7% support received in 2024. WEX last month indicated in a regulatory filing there may be trouble ahead for Impactive related to requirements from the FDIC and UDFI for anyone planning to press ahead with a proxy fight. The hedge fund said it has responded to the regulators' inquiries and received no additional requests from either.

Read the article

4/10/2026

MPS Investor Norges to Support Lovaglio's Re-Election as CEO

Reuters (04/10/26) Za, Valentina

Norway's sovereign wealth fund manager, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), on Friday said it backed the reappointment of Luigi Lovaglio as chief executive of Italian bank Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS.MI). NBIM held a 2.87% stake in Monte dei Paschi (MPS) at the end of 2025, with a market value of $935 million, the fund manager said on its website. NBIM is the sixth largest shareholder in MPS, according to LSEG data. Lovaglio has been ruled out for reappointment by the MPS board, which is proposing naming as CEO Fabrizio Palermo - currently at the helm of utility ACEA (ACE.MI) and the former head of Italian state agency CDP. Palermo also sits on the board of insurer Generali (GASI.MI) where he has been appointed by Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone, a key shareholder in both Generali (GASI.MI) and MPS. Lovaglio was voted out by the MPS board after winning its backing for a plan to complete the takeover of Mediobanca (MDBI.MI) and merge the two banks. Approved by the boards of both lenders, the plan — which would see MPS buy the remaining 14% of Mediobanca and take it private — still requires shareholder approval. Were the slate of nominees proposed by the MPS board to win, Italian rules mandate a second vote on individual candidates. In such an instance, NBIM said it would vote against Palermo and a number of other directors including banker Corrado Passera, ACEA board member Alessandro Caltagirone, current MPS Chairman Nicola Maione and the head of the nominations committee Domenico Lombardi. NBIM has a policy of supporting minority-nominated candidates in a bundled-voting system such as the Italian one, where nominees are part of a slate. However, in outlining the rationale for its MPS vote, NBIM also said shareholders should have the right to seek changes to the board when it does not act in their best interest.

Read the article

4/9/2026

More BP Investors Demand Proof That Fossil-Fuel Pivot Will Benefit Shareholders

Wall Street Journal (04/09/26) Kirby, Joshua

More BP (LON: BP) shareholders are backing a move calling on the energy major to prove that increasing investment in oil-and-gas production will deliver value for investors. The Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, a group representing U.K. pension funds, said Thursday that it was joining other investors in supporting a resolution to be voted on at this month’s shareholder meeting, in response to the London-listed group’s shift away from a renewables-focused strategy. The resolution calls on BP to demonstrate that higher spending on fossil-fuel production can deliver value for shareholders, and was filed earlier this year by U.K. and European pension funds along with Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, or ACCR. Earlier this week, shareholder Legal & General (LGEN.L) said it would support the resolution. Proxy adviser Glass Lewis said it recommended voting for the resolution, which it said “could provide decision-useful information for shareholders.” In the original resolution, the shareholders called on BP to take a tighter approach to capital expenditure and to offer disclosure that showed how investment decisions promoted disciplined allocation of capital. In response, BP said that following engagement with its largest investors, it is “fully focused on building a simpler, stronger and more valuable BP.” “That’s why we are making these recommendations, to provide transparent, standardized disclosures that support clear comparisons across companies,” the company said. BP Chair Albert Manifold said the board recommended shareholders vote against the resolution. The extra disclosure would duplicate existing reporting by the company, Manifold wrote in a statement on the company website. “It would pull the company in the opposite direction to where we want and need to go, which is towards simpler, standardized and comparable reporting,” he said. “It also cuts across the board’s responsibility to decide how to address disclosure for all shareholders.” In a strategic reset last year, BP moved to funnel greater investment into its traditional oil-and-gas business. That continued a trend away from focusing on developing renewable sources of energy, a strategy that had hurt earnings as BP’s green transition stumbled. BP this year said it would write down the value of its gas and low-carbon energy division by up to $5 billion. LAPFF Chair Doug McMurdo said Thursday that BP still needs to show that its step-up in oil-and-gas investment is disciplined. Greater investment in oil-and-gas also leaves the company vulnerable to falling behind in the transition to greener energy sources, he said. “At a time when the physical repercussions of failing to address planetary heating hit home, expanding high-cost fossil fuel investment without clear evidence of discipline or competitiveness is a material risk to long-term savers,” McMurdo said. Shares held by the LAPFF funds represent around 1.34% of BP’s share capital, according to the group, making up a stake worth around 1.2 billion pounds ($1.61 billion) at BP’s current market capitalization. Shareholders who initially backed the resolution hold around 0.42% of the company’s shares, according to ACCR.

Read the article

4/8/2026

Ackman's UMG Bid Sees Analysts Split on Bolloré's Next Move

Reuters (04/08/26) Rabiega, Mateusz; Marchandon, Leo

Market analysts are split over whether Universal Music Group's (UMG.AS) top stakeholders will support billionaire Bill Ackman's Pershing Square (PSHP.L) proposed $64 billion takeover of the music label. For analysts, French tycoon Vincent Bolloré's next move is critical and uncertain. Along with Vivendi (VIV.PA), also controlled by the Bolloré family, analysts were split over whether the leading shareholders would welcome the touted value creation from a U.S. listing or if they would prefer to retain more control of the company. Neither party, which together hold close to 32% of UMG's shares, has commented on the proposal yet. J.P. Morgan (NYSE: JPM) does not expect the duo of Bolloré and Vivendi to support the deal, saying "there is nothing in proposal that UMG could not do itself" and that Bolloré may want to realize opportunities to seize value on its own schedule. AlphaValue analysts said on Vivendi and Bolloré that the U.S. listing "disguised as a merger" could provide a welcome cash injection for both groups, should they accept the offer. Morningstar did not make a prediction on whether the shareholders would back the deal but said the merger could help unlock some value in UMG, which it views as "grossly undervalued." It added that apart from Bolloré, Vivendi, Tencent (TCEHY), and Pershing Square itself, the rest of shareholders would have "little to say in the outcome." Deutsche Bank analysts also gave no forecast on whether the deal would get Bollore's backing, though they said the offer was "opportunistic and timely" considering UMG's underperformance against the wider market, as shown by its year-to-date decline of around 14% as of Tuesday. ING analysts said that while they noticed "a bit of wishful thinking" on "toppish" valuation scenarios, the Pershing proposal raised many valid points on shortcoming troubling UMG. On Tuesday, the analysts said the deal "might well fail."

Read the article

4/8/2026

Swatch Urges Shareholders to Vote Against GreenWood Investors' Bid for Board Seat

Reuters (04/08/26) Kaesebier, Marleen; Hirt, Oliver

Swatch (UHR.S) has once again opposed GreenWood Investors' bid for a seat on the board and has urged shareholders to vote against the investor at its upcoming annual general meeting, the watchmaker said on Wednesday. The Swiss company, which sells luxury watches with its brands Omega, Breguet and Blancpain alongside its plastic watches, said the American firm's candidate and founder, Steven Wood, was not suitable to represent the interests of its shareholders. During a bid for a so-called bearer shareholder representative spot, Swatch said only 4% of GreenWood Builders Fund IV's shares in the company were bearer shares, while the other 96% were registered shares. It added that Wood did not have connections or experience in the Swiss industry. GreenWood did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. Wood failed to secure a spot as bearer shareholder representative in May last year due to opposition from the Swatch founding family, the Hayeks, which controls around 45% of voting rights. Swatch had then recommended shareholders vote against the election ahead of the annual meeting last year, with 79.2% of shareholders voting against Wood. The investor has since continued to press for changes at Swatch, including for a bigger focus on luxury brands, publishing six proposals to amend the Swiss watchmaker's corporate governance in November. Meanwhile, Swatch reaffirmed its proposal to elect Andreas Rickenbacher to the board, and has now suggested him for the bearer shareholder spot in its invitation for the annual general meeting on May 12. Rickenbacher previously worked in the Cantonal Government of Bern and currently acts as chairman of the board of the accident insurance company Suva, as vice-chairman of the board of Directors of the electricity group BKW (BKWB.S) and as a member of the board of directors of Aebi Schmidt (AEBI.O).

Read the article