4/23/2026

Nelson Peltz’s Son Builds First Public Activist Stake in Intertek

Financial Times (04/23/26) Pollard, Amelia; Levingston, Ivan

Matt Peltz, the son of Nelson Peltz, has built a stake in Intertek (LON: ITRK), the FTSE 100 group that is both the target of a potential £9.7 billion takeover and is also mulling a break-up. Lost Coast Collective, the firm Peltz founded last year after stepping down as co-chief investment officer of his father’s firm Trian, has built a more than 1% stake in Intertek, worth roughly £88 million, according to a public filing this week. Peltz’s stake is disclosed as the London-listed company has emerged as a potential takeover target of EQT, the private equity firm. The Swedish group improved its offer on Wednesday to £54 a share after Intertek rejected an earlier bid. The company, which carries out safety testing and certification, said it is considering EQT’s improved proposal. Lost Coast told the FT that it had commended Intertek’s board and management for rejecting the initial offer that was “way below intrinsic value.” It declined to comment on EQT’s improved offer. The investment is the Florida-based hedge fund’s first to be made public since Peltz founded the firm last year, according to people familiar with the matter. Lost Coast, which was initially affiliated with Trian but is now independent, manages less than $1 billion. Peltz began buying Intertek stock last year, and the company became one of his first options as he got Lost Coast off the ground, the people added. He had already spoken with management and pushed for a potential break-up before Intertek announced on April 14 that it would hold a strategic review to explore separating out its energy and infrastructure business, either through a sale or demerger, the people added. People familiar with the fund described those talks as “constructive.” Intertek declined to comment on Peltz or Lost Coast’s stake. Two days later, Intertek confirmed that it had been approached by EQT. Intertek shares have gained about 10% over the past year, after surging following the disclosure of EQT’s bid. Shares closed up at £49.81 on Wednesday in London trading on news of the improved proposal that Intertek was considering. The stock had plunged 18% in a single day in early March after disappointing forecasts for two of its key business lines. Peltz told the company’s board of directors in March that he foresaw a host of potential deal opportunities for the company, according to a letter seen by the FT. Peltz previously worked for nearly two decades at Trian, which has a reputation on Wall Street for hard-charging activist battles against major companies including a drawn-out proxy fight in 2024 against Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS). While at Trian, the younger Peltz sat on company boards including the restaurant chain Wendy’s (NASDAQ: WEN). Trian has pursued campaigns in the UK, including at the publicly listed consumer giant Unilever, where it successfully pushed for large asset sales to create a slimmer company focused on health and personal care. The firm has also taken a stake in the UK pest control group Rentokil (LON: RTO), which had been struggling with the integration of its U.S. business Terminix. Yet the younger Peltz’s activity at Intertek comes amid a broader slowdown of activist campaigns in Europe. The region had just five campaigns in the first quarter of this year, according to data from Barclays, marking a 50% year-on-year drop.

Read the article

4/23/2026

BP Suffers Shareholder Revolt Over Climate U-Turn at Crunch AGM

City AM (04/23/26) Lyon, Ali

BP’s (NYSE: BP) turnaround plans were dealt a major blow on Thursday after its shareholders rejected two resolutions backed by the board and a sizable minority voted against the reelection of its new chair. At a crunch annual general meeting (AGM), investors voted down the energy major’s proposal to dial back its reporting commitments on the climate and its plans to allow votes at future meetings to be carried out virtually. The petrochemical giant’s new chair Albert Manifold also suffered a major dent to his authority, with nearly a fifth of BP shareholders dissenting against a resolution for his reappointment heading up the board. Manifold has only been in post as chair-elect since September, having been appointed on a promise to accelerate BP’s re-embrace of oil and gas exploration. But just 82% of the oil major’s investors rubber-stamped his accession, according to initial estimates, in what constitutes a significant rebellion. Board members only require a simple majority to be reelected, though personnel resolutions typically receive near-unanimous backing at AGMs. The vote lays bare a widening split among BP's investor base, which was uprooted in February 2025 when activist hedge fund Elliott Management took up a 5% stake in the then ailing oil major. Elliott has been pushing for the FTSE-100 firm to drastically simplify its operations, doubling down on its core oil and gas business in a bid to arrest a years-long pattern of under-performance relative to its main rivals. But other major shareholders had refused to back Manifold’s reelection. In a major broadside, Legal & General (LGEN.L), BP’s eighth-largest shareholder, said it was “deeply concerned” by BP’s decision to renege on its climate strategy. “We believe that climate change represents a financially material and systemic long-term risk to our clients’ portfolios,” L&G wrote in a post on its website. Proxy advisers Glass Lewis and ISS had also recommended shareholders vote against Manifold’s reelection, and vote down the remote AGM and disclosure motions. The AGM was the first set piece meeting for both Manifold and Megan O’Neill, the American oil and gas executive put in charge of overseeing the strategic overhaul. She was named Murray Auchincloss’s replacement in December, after the Canadian was ousted having served less than two years. She formally took the reins last month. The run-up to the pair’s first meeting had been mired in controversy, after the board blocked resolution tabled by Follow This despite it meeting the threshold. The activist group had lodged a motion that would have obliged BP to devise plans for how to create value for shareholders. Joshua Sherrard-Bewhay, environment, social and governance investment analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: Whilst Manifold has reportedly been re-elected, this has raised governance concerns for some BP shareholders. BP made clear that the resolution was excluded from the ballot as it was not legally valid in their view. BP had enjoyed an improvement in fortunes in the run-up to the vote, buoyed by the higher oil price resulting from the Iran war. Unlike many of its rivals, the group does have an especially large footprint in the Middle East, meaning its output has not been as badly impacted by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane. Its shares are up more than 30% since the start of the 2026 and nearly 60% in the past year.

Read the article

4/23/2026

KeyCorp Bulks Up Investment Banking With Purchase of UK Firm

American Banker (04/23/26) Kline, Allissa

KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) in Cleveland plans to expand its financial advisory business to the other side of the Atlantic by acquiring a middle-market investment banking advisory firm based in the United Kingdom. The $189 billion-asset parent company of KeyBank said Wednesday that it's signed a definitive agreement to buy Clearwater Corporate Finance LLP, also known as Clearwater UK. The proposed acquisition comes six years after Key's corporate and investment bank partnered with Clearwater to increase the level of cross-border mergers and acquisitions on behalf of both firms' corporate and institutional clients. The deal marks Key's first entry into the Western European market, it said in a press release. Clearwater UK, which has about 130 employees, has offices in Birmingham, London, Leeds, and Manchester. It is part of a broader Clearwater network with partnerships and offices in countries such as France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland, according to its website. The proposed combined platform, which still needs regulatory approval from the U.K. Regulatory Conduct Authority, would be a win for clients on both sides of the pond, KeyBank said in the release. The acquisition would offer U.S.-based private equity sponsors and corporate clients access to European acquisition options and exit strategies, and give European clients access to the merger-and-acquisition market in the states. "Years of collaboration with Clearwater have generated significant value for clients on both sides of the Atlantic," Randy Paine, president of Key Institutional Bank, which includes KeyBanc Capital Markets and KeyBank Real Estate Capital, said in the release. The deal "is the natural next step in the relationship and directly supports our institutional banking growth strategy." If approved, the transaction is expected to close during the second half of the year, the bank said. Key did not disclose the deal's financial terms, but a company spokesperson said Wednesday that the transaction is "structured as a strategic tuck-in acquisition focused on expanding Key's fee-based revenue capabilities in the Western European market." No U.S. regulatory approvals are expected to be required at this point, the spokesperson said. The pending deal is the first acquisition of any kind that Key has announced since it faced pressure from an investor in 2025. The investor, HoldCo Asset Management, accused the company of diluting shareholder value and urged its board of directors to enact a moratorium on bank acquisitions. While the board did not declare any such moratorium, Key Chairman and CEO Chris Gorman told investors in December that his management team would abstain from bank deals and return capital to shareholders. Gorman stuck to that message last week during Key's first-quarter earnings call. When an analyst asked how the bank is thinking about "any potential inorganic opportunities," he said Key has been hiring individuals and groups of bankers, and that it "would look at small acquisition of … boutique-type operations, which are really just an extension of hiring a group of people." During the same call, Gorman described the middle-market M&A business as Key's niche, indicating that the bank is not focusing as much on large corporate deals where the megabanks dominate. Though investors have sometimes punished banks for engaging in M&A, the Clearwater announcement is unlikely to negatively impact Key's stock, given its small size, Piper Sandler analyst Scott Siefers wrote Wednesday in a research note. As of early afternoon, Key's stock was down less than 1% for the day. Siefers said Key's existing partnership with the U.K. advisory firm should prove to be a positive for both sides. "The two firms have had plenty of time to acquaint one another with their respective styles and cultures, which should help to ensure a smooth integration," Siefers wrote.

Read the article

4/23/2026

U.S. Asset Manager Voya Financial Faces Sale Pressure From Activist Fund

Financial Times (04/23/26) Barnes, Oliver; Clarfelt, Harriet

U.S. asset manager Voya Financial (NYSE: VOYA) is facing pressure from an investor to sell all or parts of its $1.1 trillion pension and insurance products empire, as a wave of consolidation sweeps the industry. Toms Capital Investment Management, a U.S.-based hedge fund, has built a position in Voya encouraging the company to consider putting itself up for sale or offloading its underperforming health insurer arm, according to people familiar with the matter. The hedge fund believes Voya’s business insuring employers against health benefit claims is dragging down the wider company, the people said. The so-called stop-loss business ran a $10 million operating loss in the last quarter of 2025. Voya, which was carved out of Dutch bank ING in 2014, mostly oversees higher-earning retirement and wealth management funds. Shares in Voya are roughly flat over the past two years, giving the company a market value of nearly $7 billion on Thursday morning. Voya has outperformed rivals on inflows, recently surpassing $1 trillion of assets across its wider retirement and investment platform, of which $360 billion are actively managed. But TD Cowen analysts said in a note this month that the performance of its stop-loss business had “pressured sentiment.” Voya has long been earmarked as a potential takeover option, as several large insurers with asset management arms have expressed a desire to add scale through dealmaking. TCIM’s demands of Voya follow a sharp uptick in dealmaking in the asset management sector, as fund houses rush to scale up globally and private equity eyes business with transatlantic reach. There were nearly $25 billion worth of deals in the sector in the first three months of the year, more than half the total for all of last year, according to data provider Dealogic. Last month, a consortium led by Nelson Peltz’s Trian Fund Management triumphed over Victory Capital in a bidding war for investment house Janus Henderson, sealing an $8.6 billion deal. Earlier this year, UK asset manager Schroders was bought by rival Nuveen for £9.9 billion. Founded by alumni of London-based hedge fund GLG Partners in 2017, TCIM rarely launches public-facing activist campaigns and prefers to work behind the scenes. But TCIM has recently built stakes and pushed for strategic changes at Pringles maker Kellanova (NYSE: K), U.S. Steel, Tylenol maker Kenvue (NYSE: KVUE), and retail giant Target (NYSE: TGT). Voya declined to comment, while TCIM did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read the article

4/22/2026

Proxy Advisor ISS Urges ConocoPhillips Shareholders to Vote for Independent Board Chair

Reuters (04/22/26) Bafna, Dharna; Saha, Sumit

Proxy advisor ISS on Wednesday recommended that ConocoPhillips (COP.N) shareholders vote in favor of a proposal calling for an independent board chair, citing the need for stronger oversight of management. The non-binding proposal asks the U.S. oil and gas producer to separate the roles of chair and chief executive officer, with an independent director holding the board chair position. ISS backed the proposal, arguing that shareholders would benefit from "the most robust form of independent oversight of management in the form of an independent board chair." It cited concerns over the current lead director role, which is chosen by non-employee directors and not independent directors. ISS said the existing governance structure could make it more difficult for investors to provide candid feedback to the independent directors regarding the CEO's performance, succession planning, or other sensitive matters. "The board is responsible for overseeing management and instilling accountability, and conflicts of interest may arise when one person holds both the chairman and CEO positions," ISS said. Currently, Ryan Lance serves as the chairman and chief executive officer. The proxy advisor also raised concerns over CononoPhillips' underperformance, noting that its total shareholder returns have lagged the S&P 500 over the last three years. A ConocoPhillips spokesperson referred to the company's proxy filing, which said the board determined that continuing with a combined role of chairman and CEO along with an independent lead director was in shareholders' best interests. Last month, the shale producer's board had recommended that shareholders vote against the proposal for an independent board chairman. ConocoPhillips' governance structure is similar to that of peers Exxon Mobil (XOM.N) and Chevron (CVX.N), where the top bosses also serve as chairmen on their respective boards. London-listed peer BP (BP.L), however, has separate CEO and chairman positions.

Read the article

4/22/2026

Lululemon Is Picking a Former Nike Executive to Be Its Next CEO

Wall Street Journal (04/22/26) Thomas, Lauren; Kapner, Suzanne

Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ: LULU) is picking longtime Nike (NYSE: NKE) executive Heidi O’Neill to be its next leader as the athletic-apparel retailer works to shore up its U.S. business. The company announced the selection Wednesday, capping an extensive search process that kicked off at the end of last year after Lululemon announced that Calvin McDonald was departing. O’Neill climbed the ranks at Nike for much of her career, playing a key role in helping grow its women’s business and boosting apparel sales. She departed Nike last September after spending more than two decades there, most recently serving as president of consumer, product and brand before that position was split into three. O’Neill is set to start as Lululemon chief executive and join its board on Sept. 8, executives said. Meghan Frank, Lululemon’s chief financial officer, and André Maestrini, its chief commercial officer, have been serving as co-CEOs and are expected to transition back to their respective roles at that time. When she begins, O’Neill will be tasked with helping to revive the Lululemon brand in the United States, where critics say it has lost some of its dominance in the athletic-apparel sector. The stakes to find McDonald’s successor escalated in recent months when Lululemon’s estranged founder and an investor began agitating for the company to turn things around faster. Elliott Investment Management by mid-December had built a more than $1 billion stake in the company and started pushing for Jane Nielsen, former chief financial officer and chief operating officer at Ralph Lauren (NYSE: RL), to be the next Lululemon CEO. Meanwhile, Lululemon founder Chip Wilson launched a proxy fight at the end of last year in a bid to remake the retailer’s board, after he had already undertaken a public campaign against management. Wilson has maintained that picking a new CEO won’t be enough to solve what he views as broader governance problems. Lululemon last month said it was adding former Levi Strauss (NYSE: LEVI) CEO Chip Bergh to its board to succeed David Mussafer, the chairman and managing partner of private-equity firm Advent International. Wilson had been calling for Mussafer to relinquish his board seat.

Read the article

4/21/2026

Once Shunned, Activist Investors Dig in to Win in Japan

Reuters (04/21/26) Nussey, Sam; Bridge, Anton

Activist investors are planning to invest in Japan over the long-term, emboldened by their recent successes in a market where they once got a frosty reception. U.S.-based Elliott Investment Management scored a milestone win against Toyota (7203.T) last month through vocal opposition before striking a deal, signaling how investors are adapting their strategies to tap opportunities being thrown up as the government and regulators push companies to reform. The growing role of activists is in contrast to two decades ago when pioneering efforts by Warren Lichtenstein's Steel Partners to acquire Bull-Dog Sauce (2804.T) were blocked and the hedge fund dubbed an "abusive acquirer" by a Japanese court. "Activism has moderated how it conducts itself," said Jeremy White, partner at law firm Morrison Foerster in Tokyo. "And the corporates have moderated in large part because of corporate governance reforms, with more independent directors, and an ethos of more accountability to shareholders." The surging activist interest promises to keep companies under pressure to change and underscores how Japan continues to attract foreign capital despite growing geopolitical uncertainties. Elliott is planning more activist activity in Japan, two sources familiar with the matter said. In recent weeks it has disclosed stakes in air-conditioner maker Daikin (6367.T) and shipper Mitsui OSK Lines (9104.T). The hedge fund agreed to tender its shares in Toyota Industries (6201.T) for a lower price than it said the forklift maker was worth but believes the agreed price is a good deal for shareholders, the sources said. If Elliott left any money on the table, it will make more over the next decade by having done so, said one of the sources, as it looks to build its Japan franchise. Elliott invested in SoftBank (9984.T), with the company later buying back shares. It also engaged Toshiba (6502.T), with then-portfolio manager Nabeel Bhanji securing a board seat. "At Toshiba, they got someone on the board without putting things into the public domain. Now in Japan they're a bit louder, putting out press releases and presentations," said a shareholder adviser. Elliott hired Aaron Tai from Cornwall Capital in 2023 to spearhead investments in Japan, with the San Francisco-based portfolio manager reporting to founder Paul Singer's son Gordon. Paul Singer visited Japan last month to attend a conference, the source said, reflecting Elliott's heightened interest in Japan. Given Elliott's heft, international investors including long-only and hedge funds are willing to follow them and join their battles, said a hedge fund manager who invests in Japan. Activists usually engage smaller companies in Japan which require less capital, said Travis Lundy, an analyst who publishes on Smartkarma. "The distinguishing factor for Elliott is size - it has no business going after $300 million companies, because it's not going to move the needle," he said. There were a record number of activist campaigns in Japan last year, according to brokerage Jefferies. The government's push for corporate reform has seen companies move to unwind cross-shareholdings, sell non-core assets and buy back shares. The corporate governance code was first introduced in 2015, with revisions being made this year, and the Tokyo bourse has stepped up pressure on companies to improve capital efficiency. "There remains an enormous amount of momentum and we're coming to an inflection point where the upside of that is even bigger," said Seth Fischer, founder of Oasis Management. There are fundamental factors too supporting the growth of activist investing in Japan. More than half of listed Japanese firms are family-controlled in some form with their interests frequently diverging from those of minority shareholders, said Toby Rodes, co-founder of Kaname Capital. That structure has led to underused balance sheets, stagnant wages and poor shareholder returns, he said. "Japan will have decades of activism ahead," he said. Some observers warned about the risks of overemphasis on shareholder returns. "The danger is the arrival of short-termism and financialization where everything is about short-term profit," said Ulrike Schaede, professor of Japanese business at the University of California San Diego. Others saw activist activity becoming entrenched in Japan. "Provided that they learn from each other and that they take a less confrontational and more Japan-attuned approach, I imagine that they will continue to be successful," said White of Morrison Foerster.

Read the article

4/21/2026

Genuine Parts Sees Supply Chain, Cost Pressure From Middle East Conflict

Reuters (04/21/26) Sarkar, Apratim

Auto parts distributor Genuine Parts (GPC.N) said on Tuesday that it expects near-term cost pressures from the ongoing Middle East conflict, but reiterated its annual adjusted profit forecast after reporting lower first-quarter profit. "The war is impacting the flow of certain goods across the global supply chain, adding inflationary pressure to certain product and logistics costs, and adding incremental uncertainty for customers," Genuine Parts CEO Will Stengel said on a post- earnings call. The company, however, still expects to see steady, maintenance driven demand from its industrial segment. Rising labor costs, sustained freight and logistics pressures, and higher prices for raw materials and energy have increased expenses across several industries, squeezing margins. Genuine Parts reported lower first quarter profit. Net income fell to $189 million, or $1.37 per share, from $194 million, or $1.40 per share, a year earlier. Quarterly revenue rose 6.8% to $6.26 billion, beating analysts' average estimate of $6.17 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. The company reiterated its annual adjusted profit forecast of $7.50 to $8 per share. Shares of the Atlanta, Georgia-based company rose over 3% in morning trade. The war with Iran has also curbed discretionary spending among cash strapped consumers, with higher gasoline prices prompting some buyers to consider electric or more fuel efficient vehicles. In February, Genuine Parts said it would split into two companies, separating its automotive and industrial businesses, following months of pressure from Elliott Investment Management to improve operations and margins.

Read the article