4/13/2026

Is MSG Maker Ajinomoto Sitting on an AI Goldmine? This Investor Thinks So

Wall Street Journal (04/13/26) Jie, Yang

Palliser Capital has built a stake in a Japanese company it says has a lucrative monopoly on a material vital to artificial-intelligence infrastructure. The unlikely company: Ajinomoto (TYO: 2802), best-known for making the flavor enhancer MSG. Palliser Capital says Ajinomoto has the leverage to extract a lot more money from customers but isn’t raising prices meaningfully—a restraint that in its view, is a missed opportunity. Ajinomoto is one of several Japanese companies thrust into the spotlight by the AI gold rush. Toto (5332.T), a company famous for toilets, is also on investors’ radars thanks to specialized ceramic materials it produces that are used in advanced chip making. Both have caught the eye of U.K.-based Palliser, which has built stakes in the two companies, and described them as overlooked and undervalued. Ajinomoto, which means “essence of flavor,” built its food empire on the discovery of umami and commercialized the so-called fifth taste in its purest form as monosodium glutamate, a “flavor bomb” used by cooks worldwide. But it also has a functional-materials business that houses the product catching investors’ interest: Ajinomoto Build-up Film (ABF), a specialized insulating material used to form the tiny layers known as substrates, which link chips to devices by carrying thousands of signals. Without ABF substrates, many of the world’s most advanced chips cannot be produced. Given that, Palliser, one of Ajinomoto’s top 25 shareholders, is lobbying the company to maximize the value of what it called the “most under-monetized AI infrastructure monopoly.” It has proposed that the MSG producer increase ABF pricing by over 30%, noting that it trades significant valuation discount to its ABF substrate customers. Palliser said a price hike shouldn’t hit customers’ wallets too much, since ABF accounts for less than 0.1% of a graphic processing unit’s sale price. Ajinomoto said it takes feedback and proposals from investors very seriously, and remains committed to using those insights to generate further sustainable growth in enterprise value. Shares of the MSG maker have fared well so far this year. The stock surged in February after better-than-expected earnings and upbeat profit guidance, and is up over 40% year to date. Ajinomoto’s dominance in the ABF niche gives it influence over the semiconductor supply chain, where only a handful of companies can turn the material into the ultra-dense substrates required by Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and other major tech firms. But many traditional Japanese manufacturers have historically raised prices only during a supply crunch or cost squeeze. Nittobo (TYO: 3110), a Japanese textile company that produces critical materials for AI hardware, is raising prices for its T-glass fabric amid material shortages and surging production costs. Ajinomoto’s using its leverage to hike prices when supply is stable could damage customer relationships, a risk it doesn’t seem inclined to take, analysts said. ABF prices have remained stable as there haven’t been severe shortages recently, said Shih Fang Chiu, a senior researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research. “We have steadily expanded our business by co-creating value with our customers,” Ajinomoto said. But as demand for advanced AI chips picks up, the ABF supply balance may be shifting. Ajinomoto said it has started ramping up ABF capacity, and is planning additional expansions to meet rising demand. As AI chips grow larger and more complex, demand for the substrates that connect them to devices is soaring. Industry forecasts show the supply-demand gap widening sharply through 2028. Major substrate manufacturers have said AI-related production lines are at or near full capacity, and they expect industry capacity to fall well short of demand by 2027. If substrate makers begin consuming ABF faster than Ajinomoto can make it, the company will inevitably be forced to raise prices, said Jukan Choe, an analyst with Citrini Research. “Ajinomoto needs to better balance between maintaining its reputation as a stable, long-term supplier, and recognizing that demand for ABF is rising far faster than supply,” he said.

Read the article

4/13/2026

TrueBlue Reaches Settlement With EHS Investments

Investing.com (04/13/26)

TrueBlue, Inc. (NYSE: TBI) announced Monday it has entered into a cooperation agreement with EHS Investments, resolving a potential proxy contest ahead of the company’s 2026 annual shareholder meeting. The agreement comes as the stock trades near its 52-week low of $3.18, with shares currently at $3.33 after declining 17% over the past week. Under the agreement, TrueBlue’s board will appoint a new independent director by September 30, 2026, according to a press release statement. The director will be mutually agreed upon by the company and EHS Investments. EHS Investments has withdrawn its previously announced director nominations and agreed to support the board’s full slate of directors at the 2026 annual meeting. The agreement includes customary standstill, mutual non-disparagement, voting and other provisions. Eric H. Su, founder of EHS Investments, will provide strategic input to the board and recommend candidates for the new director position. "We invested in TrueBlue due to our belief in its long-term strategic value and competitive position," Su said in the statement. The investor's confidence may be supported by valuation metrics, as InvestingPro analysis suggests the company is undervalued, with shares trading at just 0.36 times book value. Analysts maintain price targets ranging from $5.50 to $10, well above current levels. For deeper insights into TBI's valuation and growth prospects, investors can access the comprehensive Pro Research Report, available for this and 1,400+ other U.S. equities. TrueBlue previously announced that two directors are expected to step down from the board at or before the 2026 annual meeting. Following the appointment of the new independent director, the board will consist of ten directors, nine of whom will be independent. Jeffrey B. Sakaguchi, chairman of the board, said the company looks forward to adding a new independent director "in coordination with EHS" and will continue to focus on "disciplined execution and long-term value for shareholders." The company will file the cooperation agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to a Current Report on Form 8-K. Barclays (NYSE: BCS) is serving as financial advisor and Sidley Austin LLP as legal counsel to TrueBlue. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP is acting as legal counsel to EHS Investments.

Read the article

4/13/2026

Ingles Markets Steps Up Fight With Summer Road LLC

Grocery Dive (04/13/26) Silverstein, Sam

Ingles Markets (NASDAQ: IMKTA) is intensifying its efforts to convince shareholders to reject a candidate for its board nominated by a firm linked to the opioid epidemic. In a presentation released on Wednesday, Ingles said it believes that the nominee, Rory Held, chief investment officer of Summer Road LLC, and the investment firm itself are “hiding material information from shareholders.” Ingles said that information includes Summer Road’s connection with the Sackler family — the former owners of opioid manufacturer Purdue Pharma — and contends that electing Held to the grocer’s board would “lead to value destruction.” “The Summer Road/Sackler connection was disclosed by Ingles because it is a fact that is material to shareholders and their investment decisions — you should know who is claiming to represent you and the risks they create,” Ingles said. Ingles has urged shareholders not to vote for Held during the grocer’s annual meeting on April 30. Ingles also said Wednesday it is concerned that the company would face a boycott if Held were elected as a director. Ingles said it came to that conclusion because a ski resort operator in which the Sacklers were formerly investors faced the threat of a boycott. In another presentation, released on Friday, Ingles criticized Summer Road’s investment in the company, Peak Resorts, contending that the Sackler family received “preferential treatment … at the expense of other Peak Resorts shareholders.” On Monday, Ingles, which runs about 200 supermarkets in six Southeastern states, put out a shareholder letter to reiterate its concerns about Held and ask shareholders to support Dwight Jacobs, a former Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK) senior executive, and Rebekah Lowe, a former regional bank president. On Friday, Summer Road issued a statement claiming that Ingles had previously told it that it would “seek to distract from the merits of our campaign by attacking the Sackler family — which is exactly what it has done with its misleading, inaccurate and inflammatory assertions.” The investment firm added that Held would bring independent representation to the company. “Instead of addressing investors' concerns about its anemic growth, ambiguous corporate strategy, lack of shareholder engagement and Board oversight shortcomings, the Company is seeking to distract attention from these legitimate issues by fearmongering about our intentions,” Summer Road said. Summer Road also said that Ingles is “hiding information from its owners [because it] stopped holding quarterly earnings calls in 2016, discloses the least amount of information of its peers and doesn’t report the accurate picture of its real estate holdings.” Summer Road added in its statement that “Summer Road and Mr. Held were good for Peak Resorts … its communities and its stakeholders. We expect the same for Ingles.”

Read the article

4/11/2026

Third Point Won't Run Proxy Fight at CoStar, Exits Position, Letter Says

Reuters (04/11/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Daniel Loeb's hedge fund Third Point will not pursue a proxy fight at real estate data company CoStar Group (CSGP.O) and sold its entire stake in the owner of Apartments.com and Homes.com, according to sources familiar with the matter and a letter seen by Reuters on Friday. The hedge fund changed course at CoStar after it became clear to Loeb and his team that their plans to pressure the company into focusing more squarely on the core business might not salvage the company after all. "We no longer believe that our original thesis holds true today and have disposed of our position in its entirety," Loeb wrote in a letter to investors seen by Reuters. The hedge fund never disclosed the size of its stake but it ranked among the company's 15 biggest investors. In January, Third Point signaled that it would pursue a board challenge at CoStar, its first activist campaign in three years, to try to force the company to change directors and restructure operations. Third Point had been engaging with the company for some time, the sources said. Investors have until Sunday to nominate director candidates. Third Point's frustration with CoStar mounted as its stock price sank from trading near $66 a share in January to $36.48 at the close of trade on Friday. The company's market value has tumbled to $15.3 billion from $28 billion over that period. Loeb said in January the majority of CoStar's directors would need to be replaced to help cut costs - including the CEO's compensation - and in order to focus on boosting the share price, Reuters reported at the time. Third Point wanted CoStar to focus on its core commercial business and shut down or sell its residential operation. For years, Loeb shocked and delighted Wall Street with harsh assessments of corporate America while pushing companies including Walt Disney, Intel and Campbell's to perform better. He has long taken aim at CoStar CEO Andy Florance and his decision to spend billions of dollars to expand into online classifieds in the residential real estate industry. On Friday, Loeb wrote "despite our efforts, CEO Andy Florance has continued what can only be seen as a reckless drain on a majority of the company’s operating income into Homes.com and related acquisitions even as the share price has continued to plummet." Third Point wasn't the only prominent investor to push for changes at CoStar. Hedge fund D.E. Shaw signaled in February that it was also pushing for new directors and other changes, arguing that the company was losing money because of investment in Homes.com and that a change in leadership was necessary. Both Third Point and D.E. Shaw reached settlements with CoStar in 2025, which paved the way for new directors to join the board.

Read the article

4/10/2026

Americold Board Rejects Sieve Capital’s Attempt to Oust Chairman

The Real Deal (04/10/26) Larsen, Keith

Americold Realty Trust’s (NYSE: COLD) board of directors has rejected an Sieve Capital’s request to oust the chairman of the board. Sieve Capital publicly called for the removal of Mark Patterson over “problematic boardroom behavior” and short-sighted dealmaking. The investor cited Patterson’s tenure serving on the board of the office landlord Paramount Group (NYSE: PGRE), which is now under a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. On Wednesday, the cold storage REIT’s board announced in its annual proxy statement — which is sent out ahead of the firm’s annual shareholder meeting in May — that it will renominate Patterson as its chairman. “The Nominating & Corporate Governance committee of the board met to discuss and reconfirmed its decision that Mr. Patterson is the right leader for the board, after undertaking a review of various matters raised in a recent shareholder letter to the board,” the firm said in its proxy. Americold is the second-largest owner and operator of temperature-controlled warehouses, behind Lineage Logistics (NASDAQ: LINE). It owns over 230 warehouses around the world, according to its website. But the firm has struggled with its high debt load and broader industry challenges, including lack of demand for cold storage. Americold’s stock has fallen about 70% since 2021. The investor said in a press release late last month that it was particularly concerned with allegations about Patterson’s tenure on Paramount Group’s board. Sieve Capital cited The Real Deal’s reporting on loans Paramount’s CEO Albert Behler provided to Patterson’s robotic car garage company in late 2014. Patterson joined Paramount’s board in 2018. It is unclear whether the loans were ever paid back. This isn’t the first time the firm has had to contend with a potential shakeup. Late last year, Ancora Global Holdings took a stake in Americold and pushed it to pursue strategic alternatives to sell parts of the business. Americold reached an agreement with Ancora to add two new board members. Sieve Capital took a different approach and zeroed in on Patterson, who has served as a member of Americold’s board since 2018 and as chairman since 2019. He also serves as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The investment firm asked the board to remove Patterson of his chairman title or decline to nominate him for re-election at Americold’s annual shareholder meeting. The nomination by the board clears a major hurdle for Patterson. Removing Patterson by shareholder vote could become less challenging if shareholders vote for a pending proposal where Americold’s board would amend the company’s governing documents to allow them to vote board of directors out with or without cause. Americold’s current rules only allow for director removal “for cause,” the shareholder claims. “A bylaw that gives the right to remove a director during their term, with, or with without cause, if you think about it, creates greater accountability,” said Charles Elson, founding director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. Americold’s board is advising shareholders to vote against the proposal, claiming shareholders already have the right to vote against board members at the annual meeting with or without cause. But Americold’s board pushed against shareholders having the right to remove a director without cause between annual meetings. “Adoption of this proposal could subject the company and the board to unfounded removal campaigns or attract investors who are not aligned with the interests of all stockholders,” the company said in its proxy statement. But companies can overrule these shareholder votes, depending on their bylaws. In 2021, a majority of Paramount Group’s shareholders voted Patterson off the board. Paramount’s board rejected his resignation and renominated him.

Read the article

4/10/2026

U.S. Campaigns Drive Q1 Shareholder Activism

Barclays Investment Bank (04/10/26) Rossman, Jim

Global shareholder activism moderated in Q1 2026, with 62 campaigns launched worldwide, down 11% year on year. Despite fewer campaigns overall, activism remained persistent, with sustained pressure on boards and management teams across sectors. Activity continued to be concentrated in the United States, which accounted for roughly two-thirds of global campaigns, while European activity continued to decline and APAC activity eased following two record years. Sector focus remained consistent, with Technology and Industrials accounting for nearly half of all campaigns, alongside a notable increase in activity engaging financial institutions, which represented 15% of campaigns. Against a volatile macroeconomic and geopolitical backdrop, activist priorities continued to evolve. M&A-related demands moderated toward the end of the quarter, featuring in 29% of campaigns, as activists increasingly emphasized strategy, operations and capital returns. As AI drives a once-in-a-generation shift in capital spending, boards and management are under pressure to react. The team expects questions around AI adoption to become a major theme in new campaigns, with activists challenging companies to speed up their use of AI, to cut costs, improve profitability and exit businesses that AI will replace or make significantly less profitable. Activists secured 45 board seats during the quarter and CEO scrutiny stayed elevated, with nine resignations occurring within a year of an activist campaign. Alongside these trends, governance and regulatory developments are increasingly significant. Heightened scrutiny of proxy advisor influence, evolving SEC policy positions and potential changes to reporting requirements are reshaping the activism landscape and how companies engage with investors, underscoring the importance of proactive governance in an uncertain environment.

Read the article

4/10/2026

South Korea Vows Clean Break from Era of State-Chaebol Collusion

Nikkei Asia (04/10/26) Jaewon, Kim

South Korea's justice minister said the era of close ties between the government and the country's strong family-run conglomerates, known as chaebol, has effectively ended. "[South Korea] is not a country where the government and the market are so closely intertwined that the government can manipulate businesses at will. Under the Lee Jae Myung administration, they are completely separate," Justice Minister Jung Sung-ho said in an interview with Nikkei Asia and other media in his office in Gwacheon, south of Seoul, on Thursday. His comments come as Seoul seeks to reassure global investors while preparing for a renewed legal battle with U.S. private equity firm Elliott Investment Management over the 2015 merger of Samsung (KRX: 005930) affiliates. The five-term lawmaker of the ruling Democratic Party and a lifelong friend of President Lee pointed to greater transparency and institutional checks that make government interference in corporate decisions far harder than in the past. "Everything is now being made public. How the president, as the nation's highest representative and leader, makes decisions on issues like this ... How the relevant ministries' policies are formulated based on those decisions, and how those specific policies are being implemented." Jung pointed to weekly cabinet meetings being aired live to the public, as a way of letting both South Korean nationals and foreign investors understand the country's policy direction transparently. South Korea is facing a reopened investor-state dispute with Elliott over the Samsung merger, after a British court in February overturned a previous $117 million international arbitration award to the hedge fund and remanded the case to the tribunal for further proceedings. Elliott, which had a 7.1% stake in Samsung C&T (KRX: 028260), opposed its merger with Cheil Industries, arguing the deal undervalued Samsung C&T and unfairly benefited the founding Lee family's control over the group. The hedge fund later filed an investor-state claim, alleging that government influence -- including pressure on the National Pension Service which had a 11.2% stake in Samsung C&T -- contributed to the merger's approval and caused the company more than 1 trillion won (about $675 million) in financial losses. While it is hard to predict when Seoul's legal dispute with Elliott will end, the U.S. government is also pressuring the South Korean government over trade and human rights issues.

Read the article

4/10/2026

Impactive Aims to Replace WEX CEO on Board in Proxy Fight, Sources Say

Reuters (04/10/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Impactive Capital is urging WEX (WEX.N) shareholders to replace the company's long-serving CEO on its board of directors at next month's annual meeting as the investor presses on with a board challenge, according to sources and documents seen by Reuters. The hedge fund is also telling the information management services company's investors it is not aware of looming regulatory snags that could trip up its proxy fight, addressing a potentially critical issue the company raised last month. Impactive owns roughly 5% of WEX's shares. Impactive wants to replace three sitting directors, including CEO Melissa Smith, who also serves as board chair, the documents show. The hedge fund is not pushing to oust Smith as CEO but rather to replace her on the board and to split the CEO and chair roles, which are combined at many companies, the sources said and the documents show. The sources are not permitted to discuss the hedge fund's plans publicly. The hedge fund blames Smith for the company's lagging share price, says her pay is too high and considers the board's governance record poor, the documents show. The hedge fund argues WEX shares have trailed primary competitors Corpay (NYSE: CPAY) and HealthEquity (NASDAQ: HQY) and the S&P Mid-Cap Index since Smith became chair in September 2019. During the same period, WEX's market value, now $5.5 billion, has fallen in half, losing shareholders $3.4 billion in value, the hedge fund said. WEX's share price has climbed 28% in the last 12 months. WEX is primarily focused on fleet management, corporate payments, and employee benefits. Its board and management team have considered Impactive's input on strategy, capital allocation, and board composition, Reuters previously reported. A WEX representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment. WEX owns and operates WEX Bank, a Utah-based industrial-chartered bank, and is therefore regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (UDFI). Impactive also wants to remove WEX director Stephen Smith, who the fund says was partly responsible for rising management compensation, and Nancy Altobello, who it blames for allowing the CEO to keep her role as board chair even amid underperformance. Instead, the firm is urging shareholders to elect technology and payments executive Kurt Adams, veteran financial services executive Ellen Alemany and Lauren Taylor Wolfe, one of Impactive's co-founders. Impactive has spent months preparing for what is shaping up to be one of the year's most closely watched and bitter board fights, which is expected to be decided at the May 5 annual meeting. The hedge fund noted investors had already soured on the CEO last year when Smith received only 64.3% of support from shareholders, dropping from 97.7% support received in 2024. WEX last month indicated in a regulatory filing there may be trouble ahead for Impactive related to requirements from the FDIC and UDFI for anyone planning to press ahead with a proxy fight. The hedge fund said it has responded to the regulators' inquiries and received no additional requests from either.

Read the article