8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

9/28/2026

Gold Fields Plans Billions in Cuts, Sales in $39b Northern Star Pitch

Australian Financial Review (09/28/26) Buckingham-Jones, Sam

Gold Fields (NYSE: GFI) is continuing its pursuit of Northern Star (ASX: NST) after the Australian gold miner’s board rejected a $38.7 billion takeover proposal. Gold Fields argues that the combination would create the world’s second-largest gold producer, with operations spanning Australia, North America, and Chile, and annual production of about 4.1 million ounces. The proposed consideration would give Northern Star shareholders mostly Gold Fields shares, with an option for up to $10.4 billion in cash. Gold Fields also estimates at least $4 billion in potential value from portfolio optimization following a transaction. Northern Star rejected the offer, arguing that it opportunistically targets the company during a period of share-price weakness and leadership transition. Its board also questioned the increased jurisdictional risk associated with receiving mostly Gold Fields stock. Northern Star’s shares subsequently rose 6.2% to $23.47. The takeover bid comes after a turbulent period for Northern Star. Chief executive Stuart Tonkin departed in May following criticism from Elliott Investment Management over the company’s performance and repeated guidance misses. Elliott now owns 6.24% of Northern Star and has secured two preferred directors, while incoming CEO Suresh Vadnagra is scheduled to begin October 5. CFO Ryan Gurner is also leaving, and chairman Peter Chaney is expected to step down in November. Elliott has urged Northern Star’s board to engage with serious potential buyers while emphasizing that any transaction should properly reflect the company’s value. Analysts differ in their assessments, with some characterizing Gold Fields’ proposal as opportunistic, while others highlight the potential scale and production benefits of the combined company.

Read the article

9/28/2026

Youngpoong, MBK Demand Director Choi's Retreat From Korea Zinc Management

Business Korea (09/28/26) Sung-soo, Hur

Marking two years since the initiation of a public tender offer for Korea Zinc (KRX: 010130), Youngpoong (KRX: 000670), and MBK Partners demanded the resignation of Korea Zinc Director Choi Yun-beom from front-line management. They argued that the responsibility of the management must be investigated, raising issues with investments in the One Asia Partners fund, the acquisition of Igneo Holdings, and the borrowings that increased during the management control dispute. In a statement released on Sept. 28, Youngpoong and MBK stated, “Director Choi Yun-beom stepping down from front-line management is the starting point for normalizing the corporate governance of Korea Zinc.” Since commencing the public tender offer for Korea Zinc shares on Sept. 13, 2024, Youngpoong and MBK have consistently raised issues regarding the investment of company funds into entertainment companies, the acquisition of the American electronic waste company Igneo Holdings, and the board of directors’ supervisory function during this process. They claimed that a total of 69 billion won (about $50.5 million) was invested through the One Asia Partners fund, created with Korea Zinc funds, into unlisted entertainment companies such as Arc Media, Hi-Hat, and Slingshot, where Director Choi's family had invested personal funds. Youngpoong and MBK explained that among these, Hi-Hat and Slingshot have fallen into a state of complete capital impairment, and a risk of loss has also emerged in the investment related to Arc Media. Their position is that it is necessary to verify the investment decision-making and the process by which follow-up investments by the fund financed by Korea Zinc were made after the preceding investments by Director Choi's family. Youngpoong and MBK stated, “The Securities and Futures Commission resolved on heavy disciplinary action regarding this due to the omission of disclosures on transactions with specially related persons and violations of accounting standards,” adding, “The reality of a breach of trust transaction, which promoted the private interests of an individual family using company assets and passed the losses entirely onto Korea Zinc and general shareholders, has been confirmed through the disposition of a state agency.” They also brought up the fact that funds from the Havana No. 1 Fund, managed by One Asia Partners, were used in transactions related to the alleged market manipulation case that arose during Kakao's acquisition of SM Entertainment. Youngpoong and MBK argued that the proposal and approval process for the relevant investment, as well as whether Korea Zinc's management was aware of the purpose of the fund usage, must be verified. Regarding the acquisition of Igneo Holdings, they also took issue with the investment decision-making process and whether the board of directors provided supervision. Korea Zinc previously invested approximately 580 billion won ($446.15 million) in the American electronic waste company Igneo Holdings. They also pointed out that Korea Zinc's borrowings have significantly increased since the management control dispute. According to Youngpoong and MBK, Korea Zinc borrowed more than 2 trillion won externally while proceeding with a public tender offer for treasury shares worth 1.8 trillion won. Accordingly, borrowings on a separate basis increased from 387.6 billion won at the end of 2023 to 3.9966 trillion won at the end of 2024. The annual interest expense also rose from 25.6 billion won in 2023 to 153.1 billion won in 2025. External borrowings on a consolidated basis increased from about 800 billion won at the end of 2023 to about 7.5 trillion won at the end of June this year, Youngpoong and MBK explained. During the same period, cash and cash equivalents decreased from about 2 trillion won to the level of 1.6 trillion won. Youngpoong and MBK also brought up issues such as the capital increase by general public offering worth 2.5 trillion won that Korea Zinc pushed forward and then withdrew in 2024, and circular shareholding utilizing the overseas affiliate SMC. Youngpoong and MBK stated, “Clearly holding Director Choi Yun-beom accountable and excluding him from front-line management is an inevitable first step to normalize Korea Zinc's management and financial structure,” adding, “It is a process of normalizing corporate governance to return legitimate rights to shareholders by rebuilding an independent and responsible board of directors.”

Read the article

9/27/2026

Flashlight Capital Calls on Samsung to Put S-1 Stake Up for Open Auction

Business Wire (09/27/26)

Flashlight Capital Partners Pte. Ltd. today called on the five Samsung Group (KRX: 005930) affiliates that together hold 20.6% of S-1 Corporation (KRX: 012750) – Samsung SDI (KRX: 006400), Samsung Life Insurance (KRX: 032830), Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance (KRX: 000810), Samsung Card (KRX: 029780), and Samsung Securities (KRX: 016360) – to sell their stake through an open auction. On August 27, Flashlight Capital offered to acquire the affiliates' entire holding of 7,815,656 shares at KRW116,000 per share, or KRW906.6 billion in total. The offer represented a premium of approximately 45% to S-1's closing price on August 26, and exceeded the stock's all-time high. The affiliates declined, citing insufficient certainty of completion. "Samsung's answer was not 'no.' It was 'not like this,'" said Sanghyun Lee, Founder and Managing Partner of Flashlight Capital. "If certainty is the concern, the answer is a competitive process. An open auction lets every credible buyer, strategic or financial, put a firm offer on the table, and lets each board choose the one that best serves its own shareholders." Flashlight Capital noted that all five affiliates are listed companies whose directors owe duties to their own shareholders. Turning down a substantial premium without testing the market, and then holding a non-core minority stake indefinitely, is difficult to reconcile with those duties. "For decades, S-1 has been treated as a third-class citizen within Samsung and a landing spot for its retiring executives," Lee said. "Korea's leading security company deserves a shareholder that actually wants to own it."

Read the article

9/25/2026

Kobayashi in ¥500 billion Buyout Talks After Red-Yeast Case

Japan Times (09/25/26) Suzuki, Hideki; Fuse, Taro; Taniguchi, Takako

Kobayashi Pharmaceutical (TYO: 4967) is considering a potential buyout worth more than ¥500 billion ($3.2 billion) from private equity firms CVC Capital Partners (AMS: CVC) and Nippon Sangyo Suishin Kiko. The proposed transaction could take the Japanese health products maker private, with the founding family potentially participating. Kobayashi confirmed it received a preliminary, nonbinding proposal but said no decision has been made. The company’s shares have remained below pre-2024 levels following a scandal involving red-yeast supplements linked to illnesses and suspected deaths. The products were recalled after some were found contaminated with puberulic acid. Kobayashi says its investigation has not established any deaths as directly caused by the supplements, while authorities identified a small number of suspected cases involving contaminated products and kidney damage. The company incurred ¥12.7 billion in related charges and has paid or committed compensation to more than 500 people. Oasis Management, which owns 14.4%, has pushed for governance reforms. Going private could give Kobayashi greater flexibility to strengthen quality controls, address rising costs and invest in growth without as much shareholder pressure. Its three-year plan includes ¥30 billion for research and development and at least ¥30 billion in shareholder returns.

Read the article