8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

9/21/2026

Silver Lake Takes on Carl Icahn and all of Merger Arbitrage in Endeavor Fight

Wall Street Journal (09/21/26) Thomas, Lauren; Benoit, David

Private-equity firm Silver Lake is asking a judge to declare that Carl Icahn and a group of hedge funds illegally colluded in attempts to fight the $13 billion acquisition of talent agency Endeavor. There are billions of dollars at stake and now a legal debate that could upend the entire merger arbitrage industry. Silver Lake, Endeavor, Icahn and shareholders have been locked in legal battles since the deal closed early last year, with the shareholders arguing the buyout underpriced by billions of dollars the owner of agencies WME and IMG and headed by Hollywood super agent Ari Emanuel. At the center of the dispute has been Endeavor’s majority stake in TKO Group Holdings (NYSE: TKO), the owner of UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) and WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment). Shares of TKO rallied between the time Silver Lake announced the Endeavor take-private deal in April 2024 and its closing in March 2025. That is when investors started buying into Endeavor. Silver Lake already controlled the votes in Endeavor before the deal, allowing it to skip a shareholder vote and stick by the price it said was a 57% premium. Icahn and others have since sued, saying the deal and management undercut public shareholders for their own gains. On Monday, the company launched a new broadside that would have the investors' shares thrown out of appraisal proceedings, which ask the Delaware Court of Chancery to declare the fair value of the company. In essence, Endeavor and Silver Lake argue the investors are interlopers who shouldn't have a voice in the appraisal fight because they bought after the deal was agreed. A ruling on that could be a landmark decision on the rights of these arbitrageurs, an industry that buys up shares in announced deals. These funds often pocket profits when the deals close from small technical price changes and sometimes fight for higher payouts. Appraisals are a risky move because a judge will determine the ultimate price, which could give the investors more or less than the agreed deal. More than 70% of the public shares of Endeavor have filed for appraisal rights in the biggest such case in Delaware history. Silver Lake, which continues to defend the $27.50 per share price, says most of the shares involved were purchased long after the deal and were only bought to wage an appraisal fight, which it argues isn't the intent of the law. “The appraisal statute never was intended to allow opportunistic funds, like Defendants here, to acquire shares after a merger was announced and pursue windfall profits,” the filing said. The firm also alleges the actions of Icahn and two of his allies, Troluce Capital Advisors and Pentwater Capital, who all hold significant stakes, amounts to illegal collusion. The firm alleged the three investors failed to file proper disclosure forms, allowing them to acquire even more shares, and partner together in a legal strategy. Troluce's co-founder, Jonathan Christodoro, was a top deputy at Icahn's firm until leaving in 2017. Icahn's firm isn't part of the appraisal case, but is leading a separate suit arguing the management failed its duty to shareholders. “It is clear that certain of the Defendants engaged in an unlawfully coordinated and anticompetitive—and unlawfully undisclosed—scheme to acquire Endeavor shares for the common goal of pursuing a litigation arbitrage strategy,” Silver Lake's filing said. Representatives of Icahn, Pentwater and Troluce didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Silver Lake and Icahn already have a tortured history. In 2013, Silver Lake teamed up with Michael Dell to take his computer company private for $25 billion. Icahn jumped into that deal with other big investors and waged one of the most-heated deal fights in history, arguing the price was undervalued. After the buyers bumped the price, the shareholders approved the deal over Icahn's objections. Three years later, a Delaware judge in an arbitration case like the one at issue in Endeavor sided with several investors and ruled Silver Lake and Dell underpaid.

Read the article

9/19/2026

City on Alert as Investors Target Rightmove and Informa

The Times (London) (09/19/26) Turvill, William

Bargain-hunting investors have seized stakes worth a combined £1.6 billion in Rightmove (LON: RMV) and Informa (LON: INF), prompting fears that they may be destined to leave the London Stock Exchange. Sachem Head, the U.S.-based hedge fund run by a protégé of Bill Ackman, has bought a 6% stake in the property portal, which has sparked speculation that it will push for the business to be sold. Another large investor in Rightmove told The Sunday Times that Sachem had been making it known to the London market that it believes an AI-prompted share sell-off has been overdone and it is encouraging the company to take on debt to fund share buybacks. The implication of this, they said, is that Sachem thinks Rightmove is undervalued and ripe for a takeover. Meanwhile, Parvus Asset Management, headed by the Jersey-based rich-lister Edoardo Mercadante, has quietly built up a 13% interest in Informa, the FTSE 100 events business behind the Cannes Lions advertising festival, London Tech Week, and several comic book conventions in North America. The move by Parvus, which has previously targeted Ryanair (NASDAQ:RYAAY) and gambling giant Flutter (NYSE: FLUT), has prompted speculation in the City that it could push for Informa to make asset sales or shift its listing away from the London Stock Exchange. Two investment bankers suggested that Parvus probably views Informa as undervalued and that it looks like a long-term investment. Informa’s share price has recovered in recent months from a sell-off that was prompted both by AI disruption fears and war in the Middle East, where it hosts several key events that it had to postpone earlier this year. Chief executive Stephen Carter relocated from the UK to the United Arab Emirates last year for business reasons. Informa is currently valued at £11 billion. A company spokesman said: “Informa regularly engages with all its shareholders, including Parvus.” Rightmove, headed by Johan Svanstrom, fought off several takeover attempts by Australian peer REA Group (ASX: REA) in 2024. REA’s largest shareholder is News Corp (NASDAQ: NWSA), the ultimate owner of The Sunday Times. The company declined to comment on Sachem’s stake. But asked in an interview with The Sunday Times this weekend whether Rightmove felt vulnerable to a takeover, Svanstrom said: “Look, a plc, listed in the UK — anyone can buy shares and they can try to buy as much shares as they want. So, in a way, you’re always for sale. And that’s a good thing. We want to attract investors to the stock.” Rightmove’s share price decline, by a third over the past year, has been prompted by concerns that AI agents may take over much of the property search market. The business is currently worth £3.6 billion.

Read the article

9/18/2026

Farewell: Two Carl Icahn Appointees Resign From Caesars Board

Gambling News (09/18/26) Porter, Melanie

Two directors appointed to the Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ: CZR) board at the direction of investor Carl Icahn have stepped down from their positions, adding yet another layer to the ongoing takeover saga that surrounds the casino operator. Caesars disclosed in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that Jesse Lynn, general counsel of Icahn Enterprises, and Ted Papapostolou, chief executive officer of Icahn Enterprises, notified executive chairman Gary Carano that they were stepping down from the board effective immediately. The company has also disclosed that the Icahn Group has given up on its right to appoint replacement directors under its Director Appointment and Nomination Agreement. The move follows Icahn’s unsuccessful attempt to acquire Caesars and raises questions about whether the investor has chosen to step back from his involvement with the company. Caesars did not explain in the filing whether the resignations were related to its decision to reject Icahn’s takeover proposal or not. Lynn and Papapostolou both joined the Caesars board in March 2025, about 10 months after Icahn disclosed that he had built a stake in the casino operator. Their departures follow another important resignation signed by Courtney Mather, another former Caesars director with ties to Icahn Enterprises. Mather decided to leave the board about two months ago, after spending seven years with Icahn's investment company. Icahn owns approximately 5% of Caesars and had been in discussions with the company about a possible go-private transaction dating back to 2025. The investor ultimately offered $34 per share for Caesars, according to earlier disclosures. That was higher than the $31 per share offer from Tilman Fertitta‘s Fertitta Entertainment, which Caesars said yes to. Despite the higher headline price, Icahn’s proposal faced complications surrounding the financing and debt structure of the transaction. Those issues reportedly made the offer less attractive to the Carano family, Caesars’ largest non-institutional shareholder. Caesars shareholders are scheduled to vote on the Fertitta transaction at a special meeting on September 22, 2026. Caesars said it and Fertitta Entertainment have received a second request from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for additional information about the proposed transaction under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. The companies have 30 days to respond. “The Company and Fertitta Entertainment intend to continue to work cooperatively with the FTC in its review of the Merger,” explained the Caesars 8-K. The completion of the merger depends on the expiration or termination of the HSR Act waiting period, as well as the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions included in the agreement accompanying the merger.

Read the article

9/18/2026

Tokyo Court Blocks Toho Poison Pill in Test of Anti-Activist Defenses

Reuters (09/18/26) Yamazaki, Makiko

A Tokyo District Court blocked Toho Holdings’ (TYO: 8129) takeover defense against 3D Investment Partners, preventing the drug wholesaler from issuing warrants that would dilute the fund’s stake if it increased its ownership above 24%. The ruling is closely watched as Japanese companies increasingly use “poison pills” to limit investors. 3D, Toho’s largest shareholder, has sought to raise its stake to 27%, which Toho says could give the fund significant influence over management. The company argued that such influence could pressure it to prioritize short-term gains. Toho’s poison pill received 54.7% shareholder approval at its June annual meeting, meeting the threshold required for activation. The court’s decision could make it more difficult for Japanese companies to use similar measures against investors, although Toho plans to challenge the injunction. Critics of poison pills argue that expanding their use beyond hostile takeover situations can entrench management and undermine corporate-governance reforms. Supporters contend such defenses can protect companies from investors seeking disproportionate influence. The case also highlights tensions surrounding Japan’s growing shareholder-activism movement, as companies face increased pressure from investors seeking changes in strategy, governance, and capital allocation. Previous Japanese court decisions have considered shareholder approval an important factor in determining whether takeover defenses are legitimate.

Read the article