Media Center

Search

4/6/2026

Sandon Capital Round on Magellan’s Late-Night Dividend Disclosure

Australian Financial Review (04/06/26) Tran, Joanne

A fund backing Magellan Financial (ASX: MFG) says the late disclosures of a bumper dividend to be paid to Barrenjoey Capital Partners, the investment bank merging into the money manager, shows the ASX needs to overhaul rules so that shareholders are properly informed about deals. Sandon Capital has long held a position in Magellan, the listed funds management giant that last month proposed buying Barrenjoey. While the $1.6 billion deal was billed as a merger, Barrenjoey personnel will assume the top positions, including chief executive and chairman. Sandon Capital’s Gabriel Radzyminski has called for an overhaul of current disclosure. Investors were not originally told that Barrenjoey intended to pay a $45 million dividend before the transaction, which would reduce the net cash position of the combined group from $304 million by 15%. The firm disclosed the dividend only late on Thursday – well after the market had closed for the Easter long weekend – after pressure from Ownership Matters, an influential governance advisory firm, and a report in The Australian Financial Review raised questions about a payment. “We are concerned that it took public pressure for the company to release information that should have, by rights, been released in the explanatory memorandum and announcements,” said Sandon chief investment officer Gabriel Radzyminski, adding that the episode had exposed broader problems with how disclosure obligations were enforced. “I think this highlights the importance and the need for a real overhaul of disclosure oversight by ASX. The ASX, in many respects, has discretion. That discretion doesn’t seem to be often exercised in investors favor.” Magellan will acquire the roughly two-thirds of Barrenjoey it does not already own through the issuance of more than 100 million new shares, a structure that has allowed the transaction to proceed without the level of financial disclosure typically expected in deals of this size. The structure of the deal has proved decisive. Because it is being executed through a share issuance rather than a scheme of arrangement, Magellan has not been required to commission an independent expert’s report or disclose the same level of financial detail as other transactions. Magellan first backed Barrenjoey in 2020 with a $156 million cornerstone investment alongside British bank Barclays (BARC.L), securing a stake in the firm founded by former UBS (NYSE: UBS) deal makers Matthew Ground and Guy Fowler. While Sandon is a relatively small fund, with assets of about $200 million under management, it has an outsize influence through its public campaigns. Among its investments are COG Financial Services, a finance broker aggregator, and Southern Cross Media (ASX: SXL), now the owner of Network Seven and The West Australian newspaper, along with radio assets. Sandon has long maintained that Magellan holds excess capital and should prioritize returning funds to shareholders. While Sandon supported the merger in principle, Radzyminski said the issue now was whether investors had been given enough information to properly assess the transaction. “We’ve been focused on the long-term value of the Magellan business, and we [are] prima facie supportive of the notion of taking full ownership of Barrenjoey,” he said. “It’s just now that it’s apparent that there was information that could have been disclosed that wasn’t and was only disclosed to the market, following public pressure from the media.” Tensions escalated late last week when Magellan released additional information on Barrenjoey’s financial position, including a snapshot of its balance sheet, but again stopped short of publishing full accounts. The release followed pressure from Ownership Matters, which urged shareholders to vote against the deal on the basis that they lacked sufficient information. It argued that its investors were being asked to approve a significant transaction without access to up-to-date financial statements detailing earnings, leverage and capital structure. Magellan shareholders are set to vote on the transaction on Friday. Other advisory firms, including CGI Glass Lewis, are supporting the transaction, which has been unanimously endorsed by Magellan’s board. The $45 million dividend must now be deducted from Barrenjoey’s implied net cash position of $185 million before the transaction. Magellan owns 36.4% of Barrenjoey and will receive a portion of that dividend.

Read the article

4/6/2026

WEX Files Definitive Proxy Materials and Mails Letter to Shareholders

Yahoo! Finance (04/06/26)

WEX (NYSE: WEX), a global leader in intelligent payment solutions, today announced that it filed definitive proxy materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its upcoming 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for May 5, 2026. In conjunction with the definitive proxy materials, WEX is also mailing a letter to shareholders. Highlights from the letter include: WEX’s strategy is delivering improved results. In 2025, WEX delivered record revenue and made significant progress on important strategic initiatives, increasing the pace of product innovation by more than 50%. WEX’s board has been executing a multi-year refreshment program. Since 2020, eight directors have retired or are not standing for reelection at the Annual Meeting, and six new directors have been appointed to ensure the board maintains the right balance of skills, experience and perspectives. WEX has engaged extensively with Impactive and sought a constructive resolution. The company has held dozens of meetings over multiple years and offered to appoint two of Impactive’s nominees to an expanded board to avoid a proxy contest. The board has serious concerns regarding Impactive nominee Lauren Taylor Wolfe. The board's diligence identified questionable conduct on other boards, clear conflicts of interest, inattention to industry regulation and misalignment with WEX's long-term shareholders. The full text of the letter follows: Dear Fellow Shareholders: At the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of WEX Inc., which is scheduled to be held on May 5, 2026, you will have an important decision to make about who will serve as your Board of Directors and help shape WEX’s future. The board has nominated nine director candidates who collectively have the necessary expertise, economic alignment and dedication to the company. These directors, which include both recent additions to the board and incumbent directors, have been instrumental to the company’s recent progress and have played a vital role in guiding the company’s strategy. One of our shareholders, Impactive Capital Master Fund LP, is seeking to displace three of those directors – one third of our board – with its own candidates, including one of Impactive’s own principals. In our view, replacing these incumbent directors would jeopardize the company’s progress. To help ensure WEX’s momentum continues, the board urges you to review our proxy materials carefully and vote today "FOR" ONLY WEX’s nine nominees using the enclosed BLUE proxy card.

Read the article

4/4/2026

ISS Recommends Vote Against BP Board's Move to Scrap Some Climate Reporting

Reuters (04/04/26) Nasralla, Shadia

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has recommended a vote against the BP (BP.L) board's move to revoke some previous company-specific climate reporting resolutions, according to a note seen by Reuters. It is relatively rare for large shareholder advisory groups such as ISS, whose recommendations guide huge chunks of shareholder votes at annual general meetings, to ask investors to vote against the board's wishes. BP is pivoting back to a focus on oil and gas following an ill-fated foray into renewables in a major strategic shift now being led by Meg O'Neill, who took the helm this week as the company's fourth CEO since 2023. BP's board has called for a vote at its April 23 meeting to retire two resolutions from 2015 and 2019 requiring company-specific climate reporting. In its analysis explaining the recommendation published late on Friday, ISS called the board's move "unprecedented in the UK context." "We do not consider the Board's argument that the prior resolutions detract from the clarity of reporting and standardized disclosures to constitute a sufficiently compelling case to offset the concerns for 'retiring' the relevant disclosures," it said. BP needs at least 75% shareholder support to scrap the commitments, which were approved with nearly 100% support at the time. ISS is also calling for shareholders to vote against a measure that would allow BP to hold online-only shareholder meetings. BP's board has said the climate reporting requirements targeted by its proposal have largely been superseded by mandatory disclosure frameworks that provide more comparable data. It would still report climate data according to broader frameworks such as the Task Force on climate-related Financial Disclosures and climate-related Financial Disclosure Regulations, the company has said. A BP spokesperson said on Saturday that the proposal to scrap the requirements followed "extensive engagement with our largest investors." "We are fully focused on building a simpler, stronger and more valuable BP. That's why we are making these recommendations, to provide transparent, standardized disclosures that support clear comparisons across companies," the spokesperson said. The recommendations by ISS follow a broadening climate campaign against BP by some European investors, representing less than 0.3% of the company's owners, led by Dutch shareholder group Follow This. BP did not include on the agenda of this month's meeting a resolution proposed by Follow This calling on it to disclose its longer-term strategy under scenarios of declining oil and gas demand. ISS, however, said Follow This and its co-requisitionists meet the percentage of shareholders required to move their proposals as a written resolution. "Viewed collectively, the revocation request, the decision not to table Follow This' resolution and, potentially, the amendments to the Articles allowing virtual-only meetings could be viewed as a signal regarding BP's current stance on engagement and shareholder proposals," ISS said. The BP spokesperson said the on-line meeting proposal was meant to "increase flexibility and enable broader and more cost-effective participation in our shareholder meetings."

Read the article

4/3/2026

Align Partners Sets Multiple 'Firsts' at General Meetings of Six Listed Companies

Asia Business Daily (04/03/26) Daehyun, Kim

On April 3, Align Partners Asset Management stated, "We will continue our shareholder engagement activities based on the strong support from shareholders," and announced the results of shareholder activism carried out for a total of six listed companies: DB Insurance (KRX: 005830), Gabia, (KOSDAQ: 079940), SoluM (KRX: 248070), Coway (KRX: 021240), Dentium (KRX: 145720), and Aplus Asset (KRX: 244920). The most notable achievement was with DB Insurance. At this year’s general meeting, Align Partners succeeded in appointing a director (Min Sua) through a shareholder proposal—marking the first such case in the insurance industry and among listed companies with a controlling shareholder and a market capitalization exceeding 10 trillion won. Although the amendment to the articles of incorporation, centered on re-establishing the Internal Transactions Committee, was voted down, 60.8% of the shares represented at the meeting were in favor, confirming broad support among minority shareholders. In response, the DB Insurance Board of Directors resolved to re-establish the Internal Transactions Committee. Changhwan Lee, CEO of Align Partners, said, "I hope that within this year, DB Insurance will announce meaningful changes so there will be no need for another shareholder proposal-driven vote next year." At Gabia, a record was set by putting a court-recommended, non-binding shareholder proposal on the general meeting agenda for the first time in Korea, which passed with a 61.4% approval rate. This was also the first instance of two directors appointed via shareholder proposal by ordinary resolution alone, without the 3% rule or cumulative voting. CEO Lee commented, "I hope this case will serve as a catalyst for more active use of non-binding shareholder proposals in the Korean capital market going forward." At Dentium’s general meeting, a shareholder proposal to set the directors’ remuneration limit was approved for the first time among listed companies. However, Align Partners noted that during the on-site review, they identified multiple cases with suspected proxy irregularities and announced plans to investigate these suspicions and consider legal action if necessary. With SoluM, rather than a vote, a comprehensive agreement was reached through negotiations with the largest shareholder. The agreement includes adjustments to the largest shareholder’s RCPS (Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares) rights, securing a majority of independent directors on the board, and a transition to a professional management system. CEO Lee emphasized, "We will continue to provide active support and attention as shareholders so that SoluM can regain its rightful market evaluation as a leading global electronic components and ESL company." Although shareholder proposals were ultimately rejected at Coway and Aplus Asset, they gained overwhelming support from minority shareholders. Coway’s candidate, Park Yukyung, received approval from 50.1% of the represented shareholders, and the shareholder proposal for the appointment of an audit committee member at Aplus Asset also received majority support from minority shareholders. Regarding Aplus Asset, concerns were raised about the recent surge in insurance sector shareholdings and procedural delays in disclosure timing related to the general meeting. Align Partners stressed, "We will continue shareholder engagement activities until there is a fundamental change in attitude." Regarding Coway, CEO Lee stated, "Many of the shareholder proposals for Coway this year could have been voluntarily accepted by the board or settled through compromise," and added, "We will continue our shareholder engagement until Coway announces fundamental changes to improve capital allocation efficiency and board independence."

Read the article

4/2/2026

Randian Capital Joins Push for Overhaul at Snap

Investing.com (04/02/26) Juricic, Luke

Randian Capital, a New York-based retail activist firm, has intensified the pressure on Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP) by issuing an open letter to Chief Executive Evan Spiegel. The firm, which holds economic exposure to over 160,000 shares through common stock and options, is calling for "urgent and aggressive actions" to reverse years of value erosion. The move follows a similar offensive by Irenic Capital Management, which launched a "Save Snap Now" campaign on Tuesday and disclosed a 2.5% economic interest in the social media firm. While the two firms are not partnered, Randian’s demands mirror Irenic’s focus on bloated costs and what it characterizes as a "governance vacuum" in Santa Monica. Randian’s proposal centers on the immediate separation of Spectacles, Snap’s augmented reality hardware venture, which it estimates has consumed $3 billion in investment. "It is imperative that Snap immediately separate Spectacles into an independent entity that is financed separately, allowing the core business to stand on its own merits," the firm stated in its letter. The investor also took aim at the company’s spending habits, specifically pointing to $1 billion in annual stock-based compensation and a $1.6 billion research budget. Randian argues that these outlays represent a "sustained destruction of shareholder value" given the lack of recent meaningful product enhancements and the stock’s 80% decline since its IPO. The firm’s formal turnaround plan outlines a rigorous path to operational efficiency, including a demand to leverage AI across the enterprise to enable a leaner model. Beyond cost-cutting, the plan calls for an immediate review of the organizational footprint and a commitment to total shareholder return as a core priority. Additional recommendations include the holding of a formal investor day to outline a credible strategy and the appointment of two new independent directors with founder-level experience. Randian also insists that if Snap cannot deliver value as a public entity, the board "should undertake a thorough review of strategic alternatives." A primary grievance for the investor remains Snap’s multi-class share structure, which grants founders Spiegel and Bobby Murphy total control while leaving public investors without a vote. "The absence of any shareholder governance has produced a predictably horrible total return," Randian noted in a social media post preceding the letter. To address this, the firm is urging the board to collapse the dual-class structure and restore shareholder enfranchisement to attract a stable institutional base. These recommendations align with Irenic’s view that the current structure prevents Snap from being included in major indices and increases the company’s cost of capital. “We thank Irenic for leading the charge, and hope management and the Board begin listening to frustrated and long-suffering shareholders,” Randian said in a statement to Investing.com. Randian, known for its involvement in the retail-led movement around Opendoor Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: OPEN) last year, as well as its turnaround plans for One Group Hospitality Inc (NASDAQ: STKS) and DocuSign Inc (NASDAQ: DOCU), intends to leverage its influence to organize retail investors. The firm has announced a "Snap Investor Town Hall" to be held live on X on April 6 at 7 PM EST to discuss its turnaround plan. "We believe retail investors need to make their voices heard to let Evan Spiegel know urgent and aggressive actions are needed to save the company," the firm wrote. By fostering a collective voice, Randian aims to force a strategic shift that it believes is long overdue for the social media pioneer.

Read the article

4/2/2026

Investment Trusts Call for UK Rule Change to Frustrate Activist Investors

Financial Times (04/02/26) Arnold, Martin

The UK investment trust industry is calling on the financial regulator to change rules to frustrate activist investors seeking to take control of the listed vehicles, intensifying the contest over the future of the 150-year-old sector. The Association of Investment Companies (AIC) said on Thursday that a tussle for control of a UK-listed investment trust had “exposed gaps which need to be addressed” and urged the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to overhaul its rules in response. The trade body, which represents closed-ended funds including investment trusts, said the FCA should change its related-party rules to prevent large shareholders from voting on their own proposals to appoint themselves as a trust’s asset manager. The AIC’s petition comes ahead of a crucial shareholder vote next week at Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust (LSE: EWI) to decide if the board of the FTSE 250 trust is taken over by Boaz Weinstein’s Saba Capital or if its investors accept an offer to cash out first. The contest has been given added urgency by the fact that EWIT’s biggest asset is a stake in SpaceX, Elon Musk’s rocket company that is preparing to go public in what is expected to be the world’s biggest initial public offering. Saba, which has invested in several UK-listed investment trusts, is seeking to replace the board of EWIT and take over as its appointed manager from Baillie Gifford. Richard Stone, AIC chief executive, said: “Saba’s admission this week that it wants to replace Baillie Gifford and become the investment manager for Edinburgh Worldwide highlights a potential conflict of interest that the current listing rules are not designed to tackle.” The FCA said last month it would review its listing rules for investment companies, including how they apply to board independence and related-party provisions. But FCA executive director of markets Simon Walls told the Sunday Times that calls for it to suppress shareholder activism risked appearing “short-sighted” and “self-interested." Jonathan Simpson-Dent, chair of EWIT, then issued an open letter criticizing the FCA’s stance and saying “retail investors deserve better safeguards from activist campaigns." “Retail investors deserve a system that works for them, as well as for the most powerful shareholders,” Simpson-Dent said. “I therefore welcome the FCA’s consultation later this year, though for the shareholders of Edinburgh Worldwide, any changes will come too late.” The AIC said Saba’s push to gain control of EWIT “raises urgent questions about the nature of board independence." “The current listing rules need amending to ensure shareholder activism remains a positive influence in corporate culture, not a route to riches at the expense of other shareholders,” Stone at the AIC said. “Our priority is to prevent potential conflicts of interest and better protect the rights of all shareholders.” Saba Capital said the AIC “only has one priority: to protect its paying members, who are the investment trusts and their managers, at all costs." The investor added: “Its recent self-serving actions make clear it has no interest in shareholder democracy or in holding boards and managers accountable.” The FCA said in a statement on Thursday: “We welcome engagement on this as we’ve already announced a review looking at whether it could be clearer that our related-party and board independence rules apply to prospective investment managers and directors.” “We want to ensure minority shareholders have the right protections against conflicts of interest in the terms under which investment managers are appointed.”

Read the article

4/2/2026

Ingles Markets Pushes Back on Summer Road LLC

Grocery Dive (04/02/26) Silverstein, Sam

Ingles Markets (NASDAQ: IMKTA) is pushing back on an effort by an investment firm linked to the opioid epidemic to elect one of its representatives to the grocer’s board of directors, which the company said would harm its operations and damage its stock price if approved by shareholders. The investment firm, Summer Road LLC, sent a letter to owners of Ingles’ stock urging them to vote for Rory Held during Ingles’ upcoming annual meeting, which is set for April 30. In a letter to shareholders, Ingles’ board said that associating with Held, who it said is an employee of Summer Road, would “be harmful to Ingles and all of our stakeholders.” Summer Road said Held would provide an independent voice on Ingles’ board, adding that the board and the company’s management “have failed [shareholders] by treating the Company like a private entity run for the benefit of Chairman Robert P. Ingle, II.” Summer Road, which says it owns about 3% of the outstanding shares of Ingles’ Class A common stock, said in the letter that Ingles’ shareholder returns have underperformed those of other publicly traded grocers and companies in the S&P 500 in recent years. “[I]ngles leadership has presided over prolonged periods of underperformance, maintained a culture of opacity and prioritized their own capital returns while keeping our dividends stagnant for decades,” Summer Road wrote. Ingles said in its letter that its shareholder returns have in recent years “meaningfully outperformed” those of members of the S&P SmallCap 600, an index that tracks companies with relatively small market capitalizations. The grocer added that it has also outperformed “relevant grocery peers.” Ingles said shareholders should not vote for Held because Summer Road is the family investment office for members of the Sackler family, which controlled pharmaceutical manufacturer Purdue Pharma. Purdue Pharma was forced to file for bankruptcy protection over its role marketing highly addictive opioid medications and has been restructured. Ingles said in the letter that allowing Held to join its board would potentially lead to lost sales because of Summer Road’s connection with the Sackler family. Ingles also believes it would lose pharmacy and fuel sales in addition to opportunities to create value over the long term, according to the letter. “We believe customers may choose to shop anywhere else but at a store whose Board includes a Sackler Representative – particularly if they have experienced the loss of a family member or friend due to the addiction caused by the Sacklers’ OxyContin,” Ingles said, referring to the brand name of an opioid-based painkiller Purdue Pharma developed and distributed. Ingles urged shareholders to vote for its nominees, who include Dwight Jacobs, a former Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK) senior executive, and Rebekah Lowe, a former regional bank president. Summer Road said that Held, if elected to the board, would push Ingles to consider breaking into two companies — one to handle its grocery operations and the other to own its real estate. According to Ingles’ annual report for fiscal year 2025, the company owns the property occupied by 174 of its supermarkets. Held would also advocate for “an exhaustive, data-driven study” of how the company allocates data, Summer Road said, adding that it believes that returning capital to shareholders is likely the highest-return opportunity available to the company. In addition, Held would urge Ingles to reinstate quarterly earnings calls and make other changes to how it handles relationships with investors, according to Summer Road. Ingles, which runs about 200 supermarkets in six Southeastern states, recorded net sales of $1.37 billion during the first quarter of fiscal 2026, up 6.6% compared with the same period during the prior year. Net income for the quarter rose almost 70%, to $28.1 million.

Read the article

4/1/2026

Elliott Says Mitsui OSK’s Medium-term Plan Does Not Go ‘Far Enough’

Investing.com (04/01/26) Warrick, Ambar

Elliott Investment Management said on Wednesday that Japanese shipping giant Mitsui O.S.K. Lines’ (TYO:9104) new medium-term management plan did not go “far enough” in providing shareholder returns, especially in comparison to its peers. The investor said in a statement that the initiatives outlined by Mitsui in its medium-term management plan (MTMP) were positive steps towards improving shareholder returns and increasing capital efficiency. “Elliott remains concerned that the MTMP does not go far enough in closing Mitsui O.S.K.’s significant gap in shareholder returns to its peers or concretely addressing the large unrealized gains from vessels and real estate on the Company’s balance sheet,” the investor said. “Mitsui O.S.K. must more ambitiously confront the factors behind its deep undervaluation.” Shares of the shipping line fell 1.3% on Wednesday. The company recently released a “phase 2” of its Blue Action 2035 transformation plan aimed at shifting focus towards “value realization” in the next four years. Elliott had in March disclosed a “significant” stake in Mitsui, stating that the stock was materially undervalued despite its strong business and high-quality assets.

Read the article

4/1/2026

New BP CEO Meg O'Neill Starts Off by Promising Consistency, Staff Note Shows

Reuters (04/01/26) Kelly, Stephanie; Nasralla, Shadia

BP's (BP.L) new CEO Meg O'Neill began her stint on Wednesday by offering consistency while accelerating the group's performance, a year after the company pivoted its strategy firmly back to oil and gas, according to a staff note seen by Reuters. O'Neill is BP's fourth CEO since 2020 and its first external hire for the role in more than a century. She is the first woman to lead a top-five oil major. Formerly of Australia's Woodside Energy (WDS.AX) and Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), O'Neill arrives as BP seeks to move away from an ill-fated foray into renewables. "I believe we can safely accelerate performance and drive innovation, sustainability and growth," she said in the note to employees. "I'm committed to providing clear direction and consistency so we can move forward together with confidence." She joins new chairman Albert Manifold, who took up the role in October and has underscored the need to further reshape BP's portfolio to boost profitability. Elliott Investment Management, one of BP's largest shareholders, has called on Manifold to address what it has called the company's shortcomings. Manifold recently announced a leaner board, with former Shell finance chief Simon Henry among those departing, saying fewer directors would allow for faster decision-making and sharper oversight as part of BP's reset. BP has cut billions of dollars from planned renewable energy projects, pledged to divest $20 billion of assets by 2027, and to reduce debt and costs. Net debt fell to $22 billion from $26 billion in the fourth quarter last year, and BP reiterated its target range of $14 billion-$18 billion by end-2027. The company suspended share buybacks in February to focus on cutting debt and refocusing investment on oil and gas projects.

Read the article
Next