6/15/2026

Palliser Urges Taiwan Firm WUS to Privatize, Lift Value

Bloomberg (06/15/26) Du, Lisa; Lin, Miaojung

Palliser Capital is urging Taiwanese company WUS Printed Circuit Co. (TPE: 2316) to enhance shareholder value, including through a potential privatization, according to documents viewed by Bloomberg News. UK-based Palliser has built a 4.3% stake in WUS Printed Circuit and says the firm is trading at a more than 70% discount to its net asset value, according to a June 1 letter sent to the company’s board from Palliser. The hedge fund is asking the Kaohsiung, Taiwan-based firm to create an independent committee to evaluate options for boosting value — including going private or selling off its equity stake in another printed circuit board company, the letter said. WUS Printed Circuit, valued at about $900 million at Friday’s close in Taiwan, produces complex circuit boards that are in high demand amid the AI-driven expansion of data center infrastructure. The company also holds an 11.3% stake in WUS Printed Circuit Kunshan Co. (SHE: 002463), a supplier of boards to Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ: NVDA). Palliser described the Kunshan stake in its letter as a “hidden jewel,” estimating it to be worth more than three times WUS Printed Circuit’s current market value. WUS also received another public letter from Singapore-based Metrica Partners Pte. about valuation issues. Mandy Lu, a spokesperson for WUS, confirmed the letter from Palliser. She said the company will liaise with both investors this week and pledged to strengthen communication with shareholders. WUS Printed Circuit currently has no plans to go private, as the purpose of such a move remains unclear, she said, adding that the firm is open to discussions. The company also has no plans to sell its shares in WUS Printed Circuit Kunshan, as the two entities are long-term strategic partners.

Read the article

6/15/2026

Elliott Said to Take Almost 5% Stake in UK Distributor Bunzl

Bloomberg (06/15/26) Gopinath, Swetha

Elliott Investment Management LP has taken an almost 5% stake in Bunzl Plc (LON: BNZL), according to people familiar with the matter, after a profit warning last year sent the UK distributor’s shares tumbling. Elliott is calling on London-based Bunzl to repurchase shares equivalent to as much as 10% of its total market capitalization over the next 12 months, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. The investment firm is also urging the company to conduct a strategic review, with a focus on its North American business, its largest market, the people said. A more than three-decade streak of continual dividend growth helped the under-the-radar FTSE 100 Index constituent build a base of mostly long-term oriented investors. But a sudden profit warning last year aggravated a descent in the stock that has pushed the company’s market value down to £8.23 billion ($11 billion) from £12.6 billion in September 2024. Elliott wants Bunzl to deploy more of its free cash flow to step-up repurchases, after a recent slowdown in dealmaking activity as well as buybacks despite the slide in share prices, the people said. Bunzl bought back £200 million of its own shares through 2025, after repurchasing about £250 million in late 2024. Bunzl’s pace of acquisitions has also slowed, with the company completing eight transactions in 2025, down from 15 the previous year, according to its annual reports. The company’s North American business was behind last year’s profit warning, which it attributed to operational challenges. Bunzl has since announced leadership changes at the unit to improve its performance. Elliott believes separating the business, which operates independently and shares few synergies with the rest of the company, could help lift Bunzl’s valuation to a level more comparable with its competitors, which trade about 40% to 50% higher on a forward price-to-earnings basis, the people said. The distribution market in North America has attracted private equity interest from the likes of Advent, Bain Capital, Clayton Dubilier & Rice, and Warburg Pincus.

Read the article

6/15/2026

Ananym Capital Management Urges Bio-Techne to Consider Selling

Bloomberg (06/15/26) Sun, Mengqi

Ananym Capital Management has built a stake in Bio-Techne Corp. (NASDAQ: TECH) and is pushing the board to conduct a strategic review that would include a potential sale. Ananym said in a letter dated Monday to Bio-Techne’s board that the company has underperformed its peers in life-science tools as well as the broader market. A sale to a larger industry player would give more value to Bio-Techne than it can create as a standalone entity, according to the letter, which was reviewed by Bloomberg News. “While we are a new investor, shareholders have suffered for years as the company has continued to destroy value,” Ananym said in the letter. “A failure to act now risks further value destruction and even permanent capital impairment, which the board has a duty to avoid by exploring all potential paths to preserving and enhancing value.” A representative for Bio-Techne didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Minneapolis-based Bio-Techne makes equipment for life-science research, diagnostics and bioprocessing. Shares of Bio-Techne have fallen 8.2% this year, giving the company a market value of $8.45 billion. Ananym said Bio-Techne has unique, high-quality assets and strong customer relationships, but its organic growth has trailed peers and its investments in adjacent areas have lowered its operating margins without adding to growth. The life science tools sector has faced consolidation for the past few years, and larger players have paid substantial amounts for the type of assets that Bio-Techne has, Ananym said in the letter. Ananym argued that a larger player would unlock synergies in cost, revenue and platform that aren’t available to Bio-Techne currently and provide resources and scale for growth. “Bio-Techne is one of the highest-quality assets remaining in the life sciences tools industry, with a portfolio highly complementary to the leading scaled platforms,” Ananym said in the letter. Ananym is also urging the Bio-Techne’s board to hire independent financial advisers and add new directors. New York-based Ananym was founded in 2024 by Chief Investment Officer Alex Silver, a former partner at P2 Capital Partners, and Head of Engagement Charlie Penner, a former partner at Jana Partners and a former head of shareholder activism at Engine No. 1. The fund currently manages about $350 million and Bio-Techne is one of its largest investments. The investor has launched campaigns against nuclear technology company BWX Technologies Inc. (NYSE: BWXT) in May, urging it to make commercial nuclear reactors, and German power equipment manufacturer Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) and energy technology company Baker Hughes Co. (NASDAQ: BKR).

Read the article

6/15/2026

Supreme Court Bars Activist Investors From Suing Funds Under Investor Law

InvestmentNews (06/15/26) Bongat, Carleen

Activist investors just lost a favorite tool. The Supreme Court says they cannot sue funds under one key piece of federal fund law. On June 11, 2026, the justices ruled that Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act does not let private parties sue to undo contracts that allegedly break the Act. The fight pitted Saba, a prominent investor, against FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (NYSE: FSCO) and other closed-end fund managers. The ruling wiped out a win Saba had banked in the lower courts. Start with how we got here. Saba runs open-end funds and practices activist investing. It buys large stakes in underperforming closed-end funds, then pushes to reshape them or turn them into open-end funds. The FS funds are incorporated in Maryland, which has a law - the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act - that lets funds curb the voting power of shareholders holding an outsized block of shares unless other shareholders approve. The FS funds opted into it. That choice takes the air out of an activist's leverage. In June 2023, Saba sued. It said the resolutions break the ICA's rule that every share carry equal voting rights. To get through the courthouse door, Saba relied on Section 47(b), which says a court "may not deny rescission" of a violating contract "at the instance of any party." Saba read that as a green light to sue. A District Court agreed and handed Saba summary judgment. The Second Circuit went along. The Supreme Court saw it differently. Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, said Section 47(b) talks to courts, not to people. It guides how a judge uses the power to unwind a deal once a party is already in front of the court asking for it. It does not, the Court held, create a right to sue from scratch. Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson dissented, with Justice Sotomayor joining Jackson. Structure backed that up. Congress made the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the ICA's primary enforcer, with authority to investigate and bring cases. When Congress wanted private suits, it spelled them out - the Act carries two such rights already. A 1980 amendment that cut the old "shall be void" wording clinched the reading. What does this mean for the fund business? Enforcement of most ICA provisions flows through the SEC, not through private parties using Section 47(b). Closed-end funds fending off activist pressure gain a firmer defense. Activists lose a route they had used to attack takeover protections. Saba issued the following statement on the decision. Boaz Weinstein, founder and chief investment officer of Saba, said: "The Court did not rule that these closed-end fund managers followed the law. The Court ruled only that shareholders cannot sue fund managers for their illegal actions under one particular provision of the '40 Act. All today's opinion changes is that future legal challenges against entrenched fund managers will come in other forms. Saba will pursue every avenue available to defend shareholders' rights — including lawsuits under other provisions of the '40 Act and under state law. This decision puts the burden squarely on the SEC. Multiple federal and state courts have already ruled that investment managers violated the '40 Act by adopting control share provisions and vote-stripping bylaws. The SEC's own staff reached the same conclusion in its 2010 Boulder Letter. These are protections Congress wrote into law more than 80 years ago — they are not optional. The evidence of shareholder harm is overwhelming. The SEC has no excuse not to act." The case now heads back to the lower courts.

Read the article

6/12/2026

Uber Weighs Delivery Hero Asset Sales to Smooth Full Takeover

Bloomberg (06/12/26) Henning, Eyk; Prinsloo, Loni; Chan, Vinicy

Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE: UBER) is reaching out to parties interested in Delivery Hero SE’s regional businesses as it works toward a takeover of the German food delivery company that would get regulatory approval, people with knowledge of the matter said. The U.S. technology group has been sounding out companies that could potentially buy Delivery Hero (DHER.DE) assets in overlapping regions within Latin America, Asia and Europe, according to one of the people. The deliberations show that Uber is making progress in its pursuit of a full takeover of Delivery Hero, having built its stake in the Frankfurt-listed group to around 36.8%, including instruments, in recent months. A transaction would likely require regulatory approvals in multiple jurisdictions and regional asset sales lined up in advance could help smooth the process. Any sales would come after any takeover of Delivery Hero was completed. Uber wants to acquire Delivery Hero to boost food delivery outside its U.S. home market and better compete with DoorDash Inc. (NASDAQ: DASH). It’s already made a €33 ($38)-a-share bid for the company but investors have been betting that a higher price will be required to seal a deal. Discussions are ongoing and no decisions on asset sales or a full takeover have been made, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential information. Representatives for Uber and Delivery Hero declined to comment. Bloomberg News reported previously that DoorDash is interested in a deal for Delivery Hero’s operations in the Middle East, which include the listed Talabat Holding Plc (TALABAT.AE) business. Meanwhile, Riyadh-based quick delivery startup Ninja this week submitted an indicative offer for Delivery Hero’s Saudi Arabia unit, HungerStation, a person familiar with the matter said. Ninja has also expressed interest in parts of Talabat, the person said. A representative for Ninja didn't immediately respond to a request for comment outside regular Saudi business hours. Prosus NV (PRX.AS), the Amsterdam-listed Internet investment firm that holds roughly 16.8% of Delivery Hero, has been selling down its stake in the German company to resolve European antitrust concerns linked to its acquisition of Just Eat Takeaway last year. Prosus recently asked the EU to drop this requirement.

Read the article

6/11/2026

Victoria's Secret Shareholders Side With Board Over Investor

Columbus Business First (06/11/26) Eaton, Dan

An investor’s attempt to oust a longtime Victoria’s Secret (NYSE: VSXY) board member has failed. The Reynoldsburg-based retailer held its annual meeting Thursday, and Chairwoman Donna James was re-elected with more than 83% of shareholder votes. Victoria’s Secret has been in a multi-year fight with Australian billionaire and merchant Brett Blundy and his investment firm, BBRC International PTE Ltd., which is the second-largest shareholder in the business with approximately 13% of the stock. The two sides had a public back-and-forth for a year – the latest iteration of which involved BBRC lobbying for shareholders to vote against James and board member Mariam Naficy. Naficy did decide to not seek re-election. James, whose board tenure goes back to 2001 and across two other entities, received 99% of the votes. That tally did not count the BBRC votes, the company noted. All nine directors were re-elected with at least 81% of shareholder support. BBRC voted against eight of the nine directors. CEO Hillary Super was the only one to receive that firm’s support. Victoria’s Secret noted that board members received at least 96% shareholder approval not counting the BBRC votes. That firm expressed interest in acquiring Victoria’s Secret in 2021 while it was still part of L Brands Inc. The brand spun off as its own standalone business in August of that year. BBRC first acquired stock in the company in 2022 and began advocating for changes behind the scenes, including Blundy's push for a board seat. One of its arguments against James has been the stock performance since BBRC first invested in 2022. BBRC said the company underperformed on the S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail Index in that timeframe. Victoria’s Secret has countered that in the time since Super was hired in 2024, the retailer is outperforming the index. The CEO is leading a turnaround. The retailer, which was struggling at the turn of the decade, has seen sales rebound in the past two years. Sales in 2026 are projected to surpass $7 billion – a mark it hasn’t hit since 2019. Super spoke to Columbus Business First this month about the across-the-board success it has seen of late. The company, in a statement Thursday, said the shareholder vote affirms the current business strategy and that the company remains poised for long-term success. Victoria’s Secret has 1,420 stores in 70 countries. The business also includes the Pink and Adore Me brands.

Read the article

6/11/2026

Japan Governance Reforms Set to Prise Open $1.8 Trillion Cash Hoard

Reuters (06/11/26) Nussey, Sam; Uranaka, Miho; Bridge, Anton

Proposed revisions to Japan's governance code that stress the need for efficient use of cash have raised expectations among investors that corporate hoarders will start to mobilize their $1.8 trillion money mountain. The revisions, to be finalized in the summer, could see companies return more cash to shareholders or redeploy it for deal-making or growth investment, building on reforms over the past decade that have helped share prices reach record highs. Makita (6586.T) set out its cash allocation policy explicitly for the first time this year, saying it will hold cash and cash equivalents at two to three months of sales, with excess funds to be used for shareholder returns and investment. The tool maker pledged to return 50% or more of profit to shareholders and took into account the evolving governance code and requests from institutional investors, said Ryota Maruyama of Makita's general affairs department. "We recognize we are required to communicate with the market regarding the use of capital," he said. The governance reforms, from the Financial Services Agency and Tokyo Stock Exchange, come as firms have hoarded cash, a hangover from the bursting of the asset bubble in the early 1990s and the decades of deflation that followed. Now, higher inflation rates are eating into the value of corporate cash mountains. "Companies need to be more aggressive, and sitting on excessive cash is no longer acceptable," said CLSA Securities strategist Nicholas Smith. "If companies don't get their share prices up they are much more vulnerable than they used to be - not only to activists but also to acquisition by other companies," he also said. Companies still do not have sufficient discussions regarding capital allocation, said Kaz Sakai, head of Japan research at London-based Asset Value Investors. "Rather than a simple dichotomy of whether to hold cash or invest, strategic capital allocation is required," he said. Mizuki Suma, head of the legal and corporate governance team at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, said interviews of some 30 companies found growing recognition of the need for debate of capital allocation at board level. Bankers expect the governance changes to support strong M&A momentum in Japan. "As Japanese companies look to utilize their excess cash balances ... we expect companies to look at M&A with targets which are strategic and accretive," said Manoj Jain, co-founder of hedge fund Maso Capital. "We have definitely found the willingness recently for Japanese corporates to divest to be unprecedented," said Ellis Chu, head of Asia mergers and acquisitions at Jefferies. "It's having a seismic effect on sell side M&A activity," he said. Activists, which are increasingly prominent in Japan, are already using the revisions to increase pressure on companies to utilize cash. London-based Palliser Capital in April urged SMC Corp (6273.T) to buy back $3.8 billion worth of shares. "SMC would demonstrate leadership in disciplined excess cash deployment ahead of the anticipated revisions to Japan's corporate governance code," Palliser told the factory automation firm. Companies face a record number of activist proposals at shareholder meetings this year, while institutional investors are also more willing to vote against management than in the past. Still, before the revision is even finalized, war in the Middle East has upended businesses, disrupting supply chains and pushing up energy costs. Toilet maker Toto (5332.T) in April said it was postponing plans to use more cash for investment or to buy back shares. "We will keep funds readily available so we can move quickly and inject capital when needed," said President Shinya Tamura, at Toto, which also makes chip-making materials. Market watchers also emphasize the limitations of governance reforms alone. "There are limits to what you can do with moral suasion and soft law," said CLSA's Smith. "Unless you take away their tax breaks it's very difficult to force companies to do the right thing."

Read the article