8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

10/29/2026

Deutsche Telekom Hits the Brakes on T-Mobile Merger; Shares Rebound 2.8%

BigGo Finance (10/29/26)

Deutsche Telekom's (OTCMKTS: DTEGY) plan to merge with its American subsidiary T-Mobile US (NASDAQ: TMUS) has run into complications. According to Bloomberg, the German telecom giant has temporarily shelved submitting a formal takeover offer. After the news emerged, Deutsche Telekom shares rose 2.8% during Thursday's trading session, as the market interpreted the move as the temporary removal of dilution risk. People familiar with the matter said Deutsche Telekom decided to hold off "for now" on filing a takeover offer, partly because the Deutsche Telekom Works Council, which represents labor interests, voiced opposition. Under Germany's corporate governance structure, labor representatives hold half the seats on the supervisory board and wield real influence over major strategic decisions. However, the sources also stressed that the merger plan has been "paused" rather than "abandoned," and that an offer could still be revived in the future. The deal had drawn considerable attention. Deutsche Telekom had been weighing a full merger with T-Mobile US since at least April 2026. If completed, it would be the largest merger of publicly listed companies in history and would create the world's largest telecom group. But the plan encountered mounting resistance along the way. Elliott Investment Management has built a sizable stake in Deutsche Telekom and publicly urged the company to abandon the merger idea. In addition, the previously contemplated deal structure would dilute the German federal government's stake and could even move the group's holding company out of Germany—a highly politically sensitive prospect for Europe's largest economy. Deutsche Telekom therefore had to simultaneously court support from the German government and navigate U.S. regulatory review, as well as potential requirements on foreign ownership and investment commitments. The two companies share deep roots. Deutsche Telekom acquired VoiceStream Wireless for $56 billion (about NT$1.8 trillion) in 2001, formally entering the U.S. market and renaming the company T-Mobile US; in 2013, a reverse merger with MetroPCS took T-Mobile US public. Today T-Mobile US has become the second-largest wireless carrier in the United States, with a market value exceeding that of its parent, and contributes the bulk of Deutsche Telekom's profit. In terms of scale, T-Mobile US shares have fallen nearly 30% this year and the company now has a market value of about $157 billion (about NT$5.1 trillion); Deutsche Telekom has a market value of about €124 billion (about NT$4.5 trillion) and holds more than 50% of T-Mobile US. T-Mobile US Chief Executive Officer Srini Gopalan said in the earnings statement that it was "another strong quarter," and that the results "further demonstrate that our winning formula of best network, best value and best experience drives durable, profitable growth." The company also raised its full-year free cash flow forecast. T-Mobile US shares rose about 2.83% in premarket trading after the results were released, to $152.27.

Read the article

10/28/2026

Some BP Board Members Favor Breakup of $129 Billion Oil Giant

Semafor (10/28/26) Goswami, Rohan

Some board members of global oil-and-gas giant BP (NYSE: BP) are in favor of breakup of the company, according to people familiar with the matter, following years of smaller spinoffs that have failed to assuage pressure from investors to boost returns. No decision has been made, and CEO Meg O’Neill appears to be opposed to the move, one of the people said. The $129 billion company could ultimately choose not to move forward with any plans, these people said. The full board has not formally discussed the possibility of a breakup, the people said. A BP spokesperson said: “This is categorically false.” The company is slated to report earnings on Friday. The company — one of Britain’s largest public companies and an anchor of a London Stock Exchange (LON: LSEG) that has lost a series of key listings to the United States — has already contemplated slimming down its retail exposure. The company has also recently divested or considered divesting from a number of other assets, including stakes in U.S. pipelines and onshore wind farms, North Sea oil and gas production, and startups in its venture capital portfolio, in pursuit of what O'Neill has called a “simpler, stronger, more valuable BP.” The move could dramatically reshape the industry and prompt a rush for assets among the other oil majors. It could also elicit a backlash from the UK government, if a breakup prompts BP to relist the company in the United States and the continued outflow of FTSE companies from Britain. Also unknown: the response of big shareholders, including Elliott. The investor has pushed for relistings or relocations at other companies before, including dual-listed BHP. But it has refrained from such a push at BP, choosing instead to urge the company to boost its free cash flow, divest its renewables business, and improve capital returns.

Read the article

10/28/2026

DGB Investments Names Potential New Interim CEO for Ethan Allen

Seeking Alpha (10/28/26) Fineman, Joshua

DGB Investments plans to appoint Stefanie Tsen Ward as interim chief executive officer of Ethan Allen Interiors (NYSE: ETD) if it succeeds in its push to oust the current board. Doug Bergeron holds a stake of 5.2% and announced last month an independent search for the next CEO of Ethan Allen in advance of the furniture seller's annual meeting. Bergeron has nominated five candidates for the Ethan Allen board, including Ward. The board battle began publicly on August 5 when Bergeron nominated an alternative five-person slate and launched a campaign to change the company’s direction. Ward most recently served as chief integrated retail and customer officer at Neiman Marcus, according to a statement from Bergeron on Wednesday. She previously held senior roles at Sephora, where she oversaw in-store digital tools and omnichannel services, and at Louis Vuitton, where she served as general manager of Canada. Under Bergeron's plan, Ward would assume responsibility for day-to-day operations at Ethan Allen immediately following the annual meeting next Wednesday, as the firm completes a “rigorous” search for a permanent CEO. "She knows the Company, she knows our plan, and she is prepared to lead from day one," Bergeron said in the statement." Stefanie is an exceptionally qualified interim CEO candidate who is equipped to do right by Ethan Allen's shareholders and employees." Ethan Allen didn't immediately respond to Seeking Alpha's request for comment. All three leading proxy advisory firms have recommended removing Ethan Allen CEO Farooq Kathwari from the board, according to the statement. The campaign centers on succession planning for Kathwari, 82, who has led the firm for 38 years. The company has pledged to appoint a successor by June 30, 2027, while retaining Kathwari as CEO during the transition and as a director until its 2027 annual meeting. Shares of Ethan Allen fell 1.7% on Wednesday. Short interest stands at 10.3% of the total float.

Read the article

10/28/2026

Macquarie Plans Full Tender Offers for Gabia and KINX

Business Korea (10/28/26) Seon-young, Park

Macquarie Asset Management Group is moving to acquire South Korean internet infrastructure company Gabia (KOSDAQ: 079940) and its listed subsidiary KINX (KOSDAQ: 093320) simultaneously, with plans to take both companies private. Unlike the initial tender offer, which failed in September due to insufficient shareholder participation, the latest deal follows a price agreement with major shareholders, including Align Partners, with the same terms to be offered to minority shareholders. According to investment banking (IB) industry sources and Align Partners on Oct. 28, Macquarie Asia-Pacific Infrastructure Fund 4 (MAIF4) has signed a share purchase agreement (SPA) with Gabia's management and major shareholders. The acquisition price for Gabia has been raised by approximately 10.4% from the previous offer to 53,000 won, or approximately $39.68, per share. The parties have also agreed to launch a tender offer for all outstanding shares of KINX, which was excluded from the initial transaction, at 190,000 won per share. The key feature of the agreement is its commitment to protecting minority shareholders who could otherwise be excluded during a change of control. Align Partners stipulated that the launch of tender offers for all remaining shares of both companies must be a condition precedent to closing the transaction. Accordingly, Macquarie plans to purchase all shares tendered by minority shareholders at the same prices offered to major shareholders, without imposing a limit on the number of shares accepted. The parent-subsidiary double-listing issue, which arises when both a parent company and its subsidiary are publicly listed, is also expected to be resolved. Taking both Gabia and KINX private would simplify their ownership structure, facilitating long-term investment and faster decision-making. Align Partners CEO Lee Chang-hwan described the agreement as a mutually beneficial model that would guarantee minority shareholders equal opportunities to sell their shares while resolving the double-listing issue. Macquarie intends to continue drawing on the expertise of the existing management team following the acquisition. Gabia CEO Kim Hong-guk and other executives will reinvest part of their sale proceeds through in-kind contributions to the special purpose company (SPC) established for the acquisition. This arrangement will allow management to remain invested alongside Macquarie, share in future value creation and continue running the business. Verena Lim, Macquarie Group's Asia CEO, said the transaction would provide all shareholders with a meaningful premium and liquidity. She added that Macquarie would draw on its experience in global digital infrastructure to support the growth of Gabia and KINX. Government approvals remain pending before the transaction can be completed. Macquarie must obtain clearance through a foreign investment security review by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, as well as merger approval from the Korea Fair Trade Commission. The tender offers are scheduled to begin within 10 business days after these conditions precedent have been satisfied. Meanwhile, Gabia announced that it would raise fees for major domain services by up to 4.8% starting Nov. 1, citing increased operating costs. As news of the fee increase coincided with the tender offer agreement, shares of both Gabia and KINX surged more than 27% in early trading on Oct. 28.

Read the article

10/28/2026

Korea to Pay Elliott $48.49 Million Plus Interest Over Samsung Merger Dispute

Korea JoongAng Daily (10/28/26) Gu-Seul, Jang

The Korean government has conceded in an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) case with the U.S. private equity firm Elliott Management over the 2015 merger of two Samsung (KRX: 005930) affiliates. The government has decided not to seek to overturn an arbitration ruling issued on Sept. 30 in the rehearing of the ISDS case brought by Elliott over the government's involvement in the merger of Samsung C&T (KRX: 028260) and Cheil Industries, according to the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday. The decision leaves the government liable for approximately $48.49 million in damages, plus interest and other costs. Elliott initiated ISDS proceedings against Seoul in 2018 under the Korea-U.S. FTA. The private equity firm, a Samsung C&T shareholder at the time, claimed it suffered losses after the presidential office and the Ministry of Health and Welfare improperly pressured the National Pension Service (NPS) to vote in favor of the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries. In June 2023, an arbitration tribunal administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration accepted Elliott's claims and found the Korean government liable for approximately $48.49 million in damages, plus interest. The government subsequently filed a lawsuit in July of that year seeking to overturn the ruling in a British court, as the arbitration was seated in London. A British court dismissed the government's suit in August 2024, but the British Court of Appeal upheld the government's appeal in July 2025 and remanded the case to the lower court. In February this year, the lower court accepted the government's argument that the NPS could not be considered a state agency and partially overturned the original ruling. The court then referred the case back to the arbitration tribunal. Neither the Korean government nor Elliott appealed the decision, and the original arbitration tribunal reheard the case. However, the tribunal again ruled against the government, finding a causal link between the government's intervention and the losses suffered by Elliott. Just over seven months after securing a partial victory in its lawsuit, the government once again faces the same amount of compensation as in the original arbitration ruling.

Read the article