3/2/2026

Toyota Founding Family Is Biggest Winner in Unit Takeover Battle

Bloomberg (03/02/26) Stevenson, Reed; Inajima, Tsuyoshi

For Akio Toyoda, the all-but-certain mega buyout of Toyota Industries Corp. (6201.T) is the ultimate legacy play. It will reshape Japan’s biggest business group, tighten his family’s grip over the Toyota organization and end a protracted standoff with an American shareholder that tested Japan Inc.’s embrace of corporate governance reform. In what may be the largest-ever Japanese buyout deal, the century-old maker of textile looms that spawned the world’s largest carmaker is poised to become part of a new power center after an unprecedented battle with Elliott Investment Management, one of the world’s most aggressive funds. After forcing Toyota to up the ante twice with higher bids, Elliott agreed Monday to tender its shares for ¥20,600 apiece, valuing the company at ¥6.7 trillion ($43 billion), and settling for an amount less than its previous demands. The privatization of Toyota Industries is meant to reinvigorate the sleepy affiliate, remaking it as the vanguard of the group’s evolution into next-generation mobility and improving collaboration while streamlining its equity holdings, according to the board’s explanation in June when it accepted the initial offer. Critics see it as a power grab by the chairman on behalf of himself and other Toyoda family members. “It looks more like a consolidation of influence and an attempt to keep Akio Toyoda and his family in control of certain assets,” said Nicholas Benes, founder of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, who helped usher in Japan’s governance code. A representative for Toyota refuted the notion that Akio Toyoda is trying to exert more control over the group. “Mr. Toyoda’s reason for investing is to support this framework as a provider of patient capital and not to exercise control over management,” the spokesperson said in emailed comments after the publication of this story. Ever since news of the buyout became public almost a year ago, Akio Toyoda has made few public comments on it. The most extensive remarks he made were in June 2025, when he denied the deal was an attempt by his clan to cement its control over Toyota Industries. But it’s clear he sees himself as a torchbearer for core principles such as the Toyota Production System and long-term investments in next-generation transportation. The drama has played out against a backdrop of the unmooring of longstanding ties among industrial groups as Japan’s government has pushed companies to undo decades-old cross-shareholdings. Toyota Motor Corp. (7203.T) stock held by suppliers, other group companies and financial partners has declined to roughly half the levels of five years ago, when it made up about a quarter of total ownership in the carmaker, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The steady unwinding of those equity ties — designed to free up capital and boost corporate transparency — has unnerved Japan’s captains of industry, who worry activists and short-term investors will pressure them to reduce long-term capital investments and shortchange employees and other stakeholders. For the Toyoda family, which owns a tiny fraction of Toyota Motor with no special voting rights, the loosening of bonds threatens their role as senior managers and safekeepers of the founding philosophy. Akio Toyoda, 69, the founder’s grandson and Toyota Motor’s current chairman, saw shareholder backing for his board appointment steadily erode for several years leading up to 2024, though support ticked up last year. Fickle backing by stakeholders signaled board seats for founding family heirs could no longer be taken for granted. That prompted buzz early last year about internal discussions to shake-up the conglomerate’s structure for the first time in more than half a century. “The chairman’s approval rating is entirely unrelated to the current transaction scheme,” the Toyota spokesperson said. Behind the scenes, exploratory discussions had kicked off among senior managers about adopting a holding company structure for the entire Toyota group, according to people with knowledge of their thinking. The idea was to create an unlisted entity to act as a lodestar with stakes in Toyota Motor, Toyota Industries, Denso Corp. (6902.T), Aisin Corp. (7259.T) and other members in a vast constellation of affiliates, they said. A new holding company could, in theory, exert influence over Toyota Motor and its partners with little need for public disclosure or approval. But bringing about such a radical structural change to an industrial conglomerate would be a difficult endeavor that’s likely to draw scrutiny from investors and possibly even regulators. Instead, the group settled on a simplified tactic of privatizing the group’s loom-making progenitor, Toyota Industries, people familiar with the plans said. The little-known supplier of car parts, which also manufactures textile machinery and forklifts and assembles some vehicles, owns small stakes in many other Toyota companies, including Toyota Motor. Those were worth almost as much as its own market capitalization, making it an ideal option for takeover. For that, Toyota turned to an even more obscure subsidiary known as Toyota Fudosan Co., an unlisted property manager with an opaque ownership structure, to handle the transaction through a special-purpose company. The real estate firm’s chairman is the same man at the top of Toyota Motor: Akio Toyoda. As part of the bid, Toyoda himself pledged ¥1 billion of his own money, further aligning his family’s economic interests with those of the Toyota group. A Toyota spokesperson denied that such discussions took place, and that “any suggestion that the structure was intended to evade scrutiny is unfounded and gives rise to speculation that is not supported by the facts.” Toyota group companies had no qualms about those circular relationships, but the buyout set off alarm bells among advocates for greater transparency and shareholder rights. It also attracted the attention of investors like Elliott. “There’s something going on here where Akio is going to create value for the Toyoda family,” said Travis Lundy, an independent Japan equity analyst based in Hong Kong. Akio Toyoda’s stake in the special-purpose company, as well as the deal structure, would give him immense control and, depending on how things play out, make the family “immensely wealthy,” he said. While Toyota Industries’ profit and revenue are a fraction of Toyota Motor’s, it has special status as the group’s founding company. Sakichi Toyoda started the business in 1926 to make looms to meet booming demand from the textile industry as industrialization took hold in Japan. Kiichiro, his son, went on to create Toyota Motor. Efforts by leading keiretsu industrial groups to shape their own destinies date back to the end of World War II and the breakup of wartime conglomerates. Toyota’s attempts to shield its affiliates, who collectively identify as the Kyohokai, drew scrutiny in the late 1980s when American corporate raider T. Boone Pickens launched a drawn out but ultimately unsuccessful takeover bid of group auto lighting firm Koito Manufacturing Co. (7276.T). Although many of the Japanese companies that rose to become global names during the postwar economic boom revere their founders — Sony Group Corp.’s (6758.T) Akio Morita or Panasonic Holdings Corp.’s (6752.T) Konosuke Matsushita — very few still have their descendants closely involved in the businesses through to the present day. Akio Toyoda and his father, Shoichiro — who died in Feb. 2023 — both ran Toyota Motor for a decade each. But Akio Toyoda’s direct ownership of Toyota Motor is less than 0.2%. Still, the founding family has long held sway over it and the larger group. Several other members of the Toyoda clan still hold positions within the Toyota group’s businesses and network of suppliers. The family’s role in management hasn’t been continuous — or gone unchallenged. A series of non-family executives ran Toyota Motor in the 1990s and early 2000s. One of them, Hiroshi Okuda, a former Toyota president who expanded its global manufacturing footprint and pushed for the development of the Prius and gasoline-electric hybrid technology, famously told the Wall Street Journal in a 2000 interview that “nepotism just doesn’t belong in our future.” Ever since he stepped aside from day-to-day operations and became chairman, it’s clear that posterity has been on Toyoda’s mind. The chairman’s son, Daisuke Toyoda, 37, is a senior vice president at Woven by Toyota, the subsidiary tasked with developing self-driving software and other technologies for future cars. The younger Toyoda is seen by many Toyota watchers a contender to take over as CEO one day. But even if that doesn’t happen, his family still wants a voice in Toyota Motor’s future. Executive appointments at Toyota are “based on the principle of ‘the right person in the right position’ and does not indicate any succession plan,” the company spokesperson said. The push to take Toyota Industries private has been an important test case. Other blue chip Japanese company managers have followed it closely as they mull a similar future without a friendly shareholder buffer in the form of equity held by affiliated companies. “This transaction is reminiscent of deals in Korean chaebol corporate groups, which often serve to strengthen the grip of a key member of the founding family,” said Curtis Milhaupt, a Stanford Law School professor who researches corporate governance. The Toyota group is working to reduce its strategic shareholdings in order to “enhance capital efficiency and strengthen governance,” the spokesperson said. What happens next isn’t clear; by the end of the takeover process, Toyota Industries has pledged to relinquish its holdings in Toyota Motor. One scenario that could emerge is for Toyota Industries to conduct share swaps or raise cash for stock purchases by carving up its operational businesses. After selling off textile machines, forklifts and other units, what would be left is something akin to a holding company — a business entity that mainly owns stakes in other companies. That would bring its structure closer to the original plan. “There are no plans to transition to a holding company structure,” the spokesperson said. As if to pre-empt such questions, Akio discussed this possibility in an online video in June of last year. When asked whether the deal would eventually lead to turning Toyota into a holding company, Toyoda said he didn't think that would happen. However this plays out, the chairman of Toyota Motor and the company that owns Toyota Industries will be at the center of any changes. Yet Akio Toyoda has been the driving force behind the company's transformation into the global powerhouse it is today. Under his watch, Toyota clinched the title of the world's largest carmaker, a position it has held for the past six years. While Nissan Motor Co. (7201.T), Honda Motor Co. (7267.T) and other Japanese carmakers have struggled in recent years, Toyota can't build cars fast enough to meet global demand, with waiting lists for some models stretching out for six months or longer. An avid race-car driver who likes to say he “loves the smell of gasoline,” Akio Toyoda erupts in tears during the annual meeting when he talks about his love for Toyota and its people. He also continues to serve as kingmaker, orchestrating the appointment of Koji Sato as his successor as CEO in 2023 and then pushing him out three years later, naming ally Kenta Kon, Toyota Motor's chief financial officer and Toyoda's former secretary, to take over from April. The Toyota spokesperson said that Toyoda was “not involved” in the decision to change CEOs. “Akio is really just an extension of a long family legacy,” according to the Toyota Times, the company's official media portal, expanding on an interview with trade publication Automotive News last year. He spoke about living up to the family name and his struggles to earn the respect of employees and stakeholders. “Generations of Toyodas made the Toyota of today that is an irreplaceable pillar of the Japanese economy and an exemplary corporate citizen,” the article concluded. Ever since he stepped aside from day-to-day operations and became chairman, it’s clear that posterity has been on Toyoda’s mind. The chairman’s son, Daisuke Toyoda, 37, is a senior vice president at Woven by Toyota, the subsidiary tasked with developing self-driving software and other technologies for future cars. The younger Toyoda is seen by many Toyota watchers a contender to take over as CEO one day. But even if that doesn’t happen, his family still wants a voice in Toyota Motor’s future. Executive appointments at Toyota are “based on the principle of ‘the right person in the right position’ and does not indicate any succession plan,” the company spokesperson said. The push to take Toyota Industries private has been an important test case. Other blue chip Japanese company managers have followed it closely as they mull a similar future without a friendly shareholder buffer in the form of equity held by affiliated companies. “This transaction is reminiscent of deals in Korean chaebol corporate groups, which often serve to strengthen the grip of a key member of the founding family,” said Curtis Milhaupt, a Stanford Law School professor who researches corporate governance. The Toyota group is working to reduce its strategic shareholdings in order to “enhance capital efficiency and strengthen governance,” the spokesperson said. What happens next isn’t clear; by the end of the takeover process, Toyota Industries has pledged to relinquish its holdings in Toyota Motor. One scenario that could emerge is for Toyota Industries to conduct share swaps or raise cash for stock purchases by carving up its operational businesses. After selling off textile machines, forklifts and other units, what would be left is something akin to a holding company — a business entity that mainly owns stakes in other companies. That would bring its structure closer to the original plan. “There are no plans to transition to a holding company structure,” the spokesperson said. As if to pre-empt such questions, Akio discussed this possibility in an online video in June of last year. When asked whether the deal would eventually lead to turning Toyota into a holding company, Toyoda said he didn’t think that would happen. However this plays out, the chairman of Toyota Motor and the company that owns Toyota Industries will be at the center of any changes. “If you don’t take action, you can’t create the future,” Toyoda said in the video clip.

Read the article

3/2/2026

Norwegian Cruise Line Forecasts Weak Annual Profit on Subdued Demand

Reuters (03/02/26) Kanatt, Neil J.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH.N) forecast annual profit below Wall Street expectations on Monday as demand for the cruise operator's higher-priced voyages was pressured by economic uncertainty. Shares of the company, as well as peers Carnival Corp (CCL.N) and Royal Caribbean (RCL.N), were down about 7% each in premarket trading, tracking a slump in the broader market due to the escalating conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran. Norwegian Cruise is facing a slowdown in new bookings as budget-conscious customers avoid splurging on expensive cruise vacations amid persistent inflation and tariff-driven uncertainty in the United States. The company said it entered 2026 against a pressured backdrop, with "certain execution missteps" hurting bookings. "Our priority is to act urgently to address these gaps by improving coordination, reinforcing accountability, and strengthening financial discipline across the organization," new CEO John Chidsey said. Earlier this month, Elliott Management said it has built a more than 10% stake in the cruise operator. The investor is pushing for a new business plan that delivers on available revenue opportunities at Norwegian to drive the share price, while criticizing the appointment of the company's management over the last decade, including that of CEO Chidsey last month. Increased fuel costs amid escalating global tensions, including in the Middle East, and expenses related to drydocks, ship deliveries, and maintenance are also weighing on the cruise operator's margins. The cruise operator now expects adjusted profit of $2.38 per share for fiscal 2026, compared with analysts' expectation of $2.55 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. Norwegian reported fourth-quarter revenue of $2.24 billion, compared with analysts' expectations of $2.35 billion.

Read the article

3/2/2026

Jack in the Box Makes Big Change After Engagement from San Antonio Investor

San Antonio Express-News (03/02/26) Danner, Patrick

Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: JACK) announced Monday it has a new chairman following engagement by San Antonio investor Sardar Biglari. He had called on shareholders to vote against Chairman David Goebel. The company appointed director Mark King, a former Taco Bell Corp. CEO, to succeed Goebel. Jack in the Box Inc. shareholders rebuffed Biglari’s bid to oust its chairman, David Goebel, reelecting him and nine other board members, according to a preliminary vote count. Nevertheless, the struggling San Diego-based burger chain announced Monday that its board has named a new chairman. Former Taco Bell Corp. CEO Mark King, an independent director on the Jack in the Box board since November, has been appointed to succeed Goebel as chairman. Goebel will not stand for reelection at next year’s annual meeting, the company said. Monday’s announcement followed Biglari’s demand that Goebel resign, saying he had failed to garner a majority of the votes cast. Prior to the vote, Biglari had urged stockholders to vote against Goebel, calling his 17-year tenure on the board an “abject failure for shareholders.” Biglari controls just under 9.9% of Jack in the Box’s shares and has been agitating for change at the company, citing deteriorating operating metrics and falling shareholder returns. The proxy fight had gotten contentious, with Jack in the Box asserting that Biglari’s campaign was “driven by self-interest and anger, rather than shareholders’ best interests.” It alleged that Biglari launched the proxy fight after Jack in the Box’s board deemed him “unsuited” to serve as a director, adding that he vowed that battle would “get bloody” and that he would go after Goebel. For his part, Biglari accused Jack in the Box of “fabricating assertions” and “lying” that he had used “abusive and threatening language.” “Calling out demonstrably failed leadership and demanding accountability is not ‘abusive and threatening’ — it is exactly what responsible shareholder stewardship requires,” Biglari said in Feb. 9 document. Biglari didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Biglari, chairman and CEO of Biglari Holdings Inc., parent company of Steak n Shake, has a penchant for investing in restaurant stocks and pushing for change. He may be best known for the numerous proxy fights he’s waged against Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRL), which he bashed last year for scrapping its iconic logo and other missteps. It later reversed course and kept the logo after President Donald Trump weighed in on the controversy. Biglari wanted Cracker Barrel shareholders not to reelect CEO and President Julie Felss Masino and independent director Gilbert Dávila, a diversity and inclusion consultant. Masino won reelection in November, but Dávila resigned after he failed to win enough votes to remain on the board. Since then, Biglari has turned his attention to Jack in the Box. His Biglari Capital Corp. and two investment funds it manages sued Jack in the Box and its directors a week before Friday’s annual meeting, alleging that the restaurant chain had issued “demonstrably false and misleading” proxy material to shareholders. The suit was filed in Chancery Court of Delaware, where Jack in the Box is incorporated. In the complaint, the plaintiffs had sought a temporary injunction order that would have postponed the annual meeting until the court could rule on the relief they requested. However, the court declined to expedite the proceedings, allowing the annual meeting to go forward. Biglari Capital and funds had asked the court to declare that Jack in the Box and its directors breached their duty of care and loyalty by including false and misleading statements in the proxy statement. The Biglari group objected to descriptions that it has a “poor track record” of investing, “destroyed value,” “wasted resources” and engaged in “erratic behavior” during the course of its previous investments. It touted having a “proven track record of successful investments,” including the 2008 acquisition of Steak and Shake and minority stakes in Cracker Barrel and Ferrari. The plaintiffs also asked the court to declare that Jack in the Box’s stockholder protection rights agreement, also known as a “poison pill,” is “unenforceable.” Jack in the Box shareholders voted in favor of the agreement at the annual meeting, according to a preliminary vote count. Jack in the Box needed shareholder approval to extend the agreement until July 2028, otherwise it would have expired this July 1. Last July, Jack in the Box disclosed that it had adopted the poison pill to fend off any potential takeover attempt by Biglari Capital. The plan kicks in only if an individual or group acquires 12.5% or more of Jack in the Box stock. If that were to happen, Jack in the Box would give existing shareholders the right to buy one additional share of its stock — at half the then-current market price — for each share they already own. The influx of new shares would dilute the acquiring party’s ownership percentage, making it harder and more expensive to gain control. Biglari Capital opposed the rights agreement and lobbied shareholders to vote against it. King, Jack in the Box’s new chairman, said the board and company leadership are focused on improving the chain’s financial performance. “We will continue advancing our priorities to drive operating results, strengthen the balance sheet, position the company for growth, and enhance long-term shareholder value,” he said in a statement. Jack in the Box earned $33.7 million on $371 million in revenue in latest quarter, ended Jan. 19. By comparison, it lost $2.5 million on $349.5 million in revenue in the same period last year. The company lost a combined $248 million in its last three fiscal years. Its shares fell $1.50, or 8.9%, to close at $15.42 Monday. The stock has ranged from a low of about $14 to a high of about $39 in the last year.

Read the article

3/2/2026

Toyota Bows to Activist Pressure in $38 Billion Deal

Financial Times (03/02/26) Keohane, David; Dempsey, Harry

Toyota (7203.T) has raised its offer to privatize its largest subsidiary, bowing to pressure from investors who had pushed for a higher price on a $38 billion deal that will reshape Japan’s biggest business empire. Elliott Management had engaged the carmaker over its attempt to take Toyota Industries (6201.T) private, accusing the company of underpaying and convincing shareholders not to tender. On Monday, as the tender deadline approached, Toyota said in a regulatory filing it was willing to increase the amount it would pay by 9.6%, valuing the subsidiary at ¥5.9 trillion ($37.8 billion). The regulatory filing said Toyota Fudosan, the affiliate leading the take-private, had determined that “obtaining the support of a greater number of shareholders is important for the completion of the tender offer” and that it had entered into an agreement with Elliott to buy all of the fund’s shares. The plans are contingent on Toyota Fudosan securing commitment letters from Japanese lenders to fund a higher bid. Elliott on Monday said the new price represented “an improved outcome for minority shareholders." Toyota unveiled its bid to take Toyota Industries, a key parts supplier and forklift maker, private last June at an offer price of ¥16,300 a share. The buyout was viewed as key to unwinding one of the group’s biggest crossholdings, an out-of-favor ownership model in which companies own shares in each other and that has been the target of corporate governance reform efforts. But it also attracted criticism from investors and corporate governance experts for its low offer and opaque valuation methods. After Elliott revealed a stake in Toyota Industries, the conglomerate in January raised its offer to ¥18,800 a share, later saying it was its “best possible price." Toyota raising its offer for a second time — to ¥20,600 a share — represents a significant victory for Elliott, which has waged a public and aggressive campaign to stop other shareholders agreeing to the deal. The carmaker was forced to extend a tender deadline last month after failing to win enough support. The U.S.-based fund had steadily increased its stake in Toyota Industries and owned 7.7%, according to Monday’s regulatory filing. That gives Elliott a roughly $3 billion position, based on current market prices. In its attempt to pressure Toyota, Elliott released a standalone plan for Toyota Industries — a nearly century-old company from which the carmaker was spun out — claiming it could boost longer-term value to more than ¥40,000 a share. The move went further than Elliott’s previous campaigns against SoftBank (9984.T), Toshiba, and Tokyo Gas (9531.T). The share price of Toyota Industries, the world’s largest forklift manufacturer, has stayed consistently above the offer level, leaving shareholders with little incentive to tender. Elliott and other investors had also made offers to individual shareholders for their stakes at levels above the offer price. Other investors and deal advisers in Tokyo said a victory for Elliott would embolden other campaigns and force companies to think harder about the prices they offer for subsidiaries in similar deals. Shareholders of Toyota Industries will now have until March 16 to decide whether to tender their shares.

Read the article

3/1/2026

Sabre Corporation Adopts Limited-Duration Shareholder Rights Plan

PRNewswire (03/01/26)

Sabre Corporation (NASDAQ: SABR) announced that its Board of Directors has approved the adoption of a limited-duration shareholder rights plan to protect the interests of Sabre and its shareholders. The plan is effective immediately and expires in one year. It was adopted in response to the substantial accumulation of shares of Sabre's common stock by Constellation Software Inc. (TSX: CSU). In deciding to adopt the Rights Plan, the Board considered, among other things, that: Between April 2025 and November 2025, Constellation accumulated a 9.7% economic position in Sabre, comprising 4.7% beneficial ownership of common stock and a further 5% via derivative instruments, and privately informed Sabre of its ownership stake for the first time in early January 2026; Constellation is a serial acquirer of software companies that build verticals, and one of its operating groups, Vela Software, has in recent years acquired several travel technology companies; In connection with its outreach in early January 2026, Constellation requested a board seat for two of its executives, and during the course of discussions with the Company, delivered a nomination notice under the Company's bylaws on January 23, 2026; Constellation previously suggested to Sabre its desire that its investment in Sabre be similar to its investment in Asseco Poland S.A. (OTCMKTS: ASOZF), where it currently holds a 24.8% position; Sabre engaged in constructive discussions with Constellation and began negotiating a strategic governance agreement to appoint the CEO of Constellation's Vela Software division to the Board and enable continued collaboration between the two parties with the goal of driving long-term growth and value creation; On February 26, 2026, despite the parties nearing the finish line on the agreement, Constellation abruptly and without explanation broke off several weeks of constructive negotiations and stated that its intentions "would appear clear with the benefit of time;" Sabre made multiple attempts to reengage Constellation on February 26 and February 27, 2026, that remain unanswered, and on February 28, 2026, Constellation withdrew the formal nomination of its second candidate (not the candidate who the parties had been contemplating would join the Board in connection with the proposed strategic governance agreement) without providing any explanation or otherwise responding to Sabre's requests to reengage; and during the week of February 23 through February 27, 2026, the Company observed unusually high trading volume in its stock. The Rights Plan was not adopted in response to any proposal from Constellation or another party to acquire control of the Sabre and is not intended to deter offers or preclude the Board from considering offers that are fair and otherwise in the best interest of the shareholders. Subject to understanding the basis for Constellation's changed posture, Sabre remains open to resuming discussions with Constellation regarding a negotiated agreement on acceptable terms. The Rights Plan is intended to enable all shareholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in Sabre and ensure they receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any proposed takeover. The Rights Plan is also intended to reduce the likelihood that any person or group gains control of the Company through open-market accumulation or other tactics without paying an appropriate control premium or providing the Board sufficient time to make informed decisions that are in the best interests of Sabre and its shareholders.

Read the article

2/27/2026

Doosan to Burn 3.12 Trillion Won in Shares

The Chosun Daily (South Korea) (02/27/26) Jaehyun, Cho

Doosan (KRX: 000150) announced that it will effectively burn all of its treasury shares within this year. The shares to be burned amount to approximately 2.57 million, valued at around 3.12 trillion Korean won based on the closing price on the day (1,215,000 won). Following the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment, which mandates the burning of treasury shares, in the National Assembly the previous day, analysts predict that pressure on companies to return value to shareholders will intensify. Doosan held a board meeting on the day and resolved to burn all remaining treasury shares (2,568,528 shares) except for 632,500 shares reserved for employee compensation within this year. This represents approximately 12.18% of the total issued shares. Burning treasury shares reduces the number of circulating shares, thereby increasing per-share value. Earlier, Doosan had announced plans to burn 990,000 treasury shares over three years from last year to this year, but this decision expands the scale of returns and accelerates the timeline. Once this burn is completed, the ownership stake of the founding family is expected to rise. The stake of Chairman Park Jeong-won, the largest shareholder, and his special interest parties will increase from 41.18% to 46.84%. The reduction in total shares strengthens control alongside the burn. Companies appear to be accelerating their moves following the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment. POSCO Holdings decided to burn 2% of its treasury shares at a board meeting on the 19th, worth 635.1 billion Korean won. This follows its earlier announcement to burn a total of 6% of treasury shares over three years starting in 2024. LG Chem will also present a shareholder proposal from Palliser Capital at its regular shareholders’ meeting next month. Palliser Capital has argued that LG Chem should reduce its stake in LG Energy Solution from 79.4% to 70% to secure cash and purchase and burn treasury shares. It cited the fact that LG Chem’s stock trades at a 74% discount to its net asset value as grounds for shareholder activism. A source from the business community stated, “With the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment, companies are aggressively using dividend increases and share burns, making it likely they will further accelerate shareholder returns in the future.”

Read the article

2/27/2026

Elliott Says LSEG Can Do More After £3 Billion Buyback Move

Bloomberg (02/27/26) Short, Meg

Elliott Investment Management, which has built a stake in London Stock Exchange Group Plc (LON: LSEG), said there’s “still an opportunity for further value-enhancing actions” after the bourse operator announced a £3 billion ($4.1 billion) share buyback. Paul Singer’s hedge fund said that’s a “positive first step,” according to a statement on Friday. LSEG’s “encouraging guidance, enhanced financial disclosures and improved communication on its AI strategy” demonstrate the strength of its business, it added. On Thursday, the owner of the FTSE 100 index unveiled plans to buy more of its own stock to reward shareholders over the next 12 months, boosted its dividend and set new guidance for the next two years. The increased buyback falls short of the £5 billion program that Bloomberg News reported Elliott was pushing for earlier this month. “Elliott looks forward to maintaining a constructive dialogue with LSEG as the company works to realize the full potential of its market-leading assets, close the valuation gap to industry peers and generate long-term value,” the investor said in the statement. Shares of LSEG have been buffeted in the recent stock selloff of software businesses seen at risk of disruption from artificial intelligence. Elliott seized on the opportunity and is now pushing for LSEG to show investors how it could benefit from AI. It wants the company to show how its sticky data business would actually see more demand from AI applications while its markets unit is largely immune, people familiar with its thinking told Bloomberg News earlier this month. “We try to listen to all of our shareholders, we can’t always make all of them happy,” LSEG Chief Executive Officer David Schwimmer told Bloomberg Radio in an interview on Thursday.

Read the article