8/21/2036

Kaos Capital Demands Board Overhaul at Capricor Ahead of FDA Decision on DMD Therapy

BigGo Finance (08/21/36)

Capricor Therapeutics Inc. (CAPR) is facing an activist campaign from shareholder Kaos Capital, which is demanding immediate board changes, a cash-preservation plan, and the creation of an M&A committee just one day before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scheduled to act on the company's experimental Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapy. Kaos Capital, a Miami-based investment firm that describes itself as a "significant and growing shareholder," issued a letter to fellow shareholders on August 21 calling for a meeting with the board within 15 business days. The firm said it intends to nominate two independent directors and push for a board-led M&A and Strategic Alternatives Committee chaired by a shareholder-backed director. The activist campaign lands at a precarious moment for Capricor. The FDA's action date on deramiocel, the company's cell therapy for DMD-related cardiomyopathy, is August 22. In June, an FDA advisory panel voted 9-3 against the drug's use for that indication, casting significant doubt over its approval prospects. Capricor shares were down approximately 2% at the time of the letter's release. In the letter signed by CEO Adam Arviv, Kaos argued that Capricor has become overly dependent on a single regulatory outcome and must take immediate steps to preserve capital while exploring acquisitions, licensing deals, and partnerships that could broaden its pipeline. The company reported $237.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, down roughly $80.2 million from year-end 2025. First-half 2026 operating expenses totaled $79.7 million, including $23.5 million in general and administrative costs — approximately double the comparable 2025 figure, according to the letter. Kaos called for a formal Cash Preservation Plan that would include: a near-term freeze on nonessential spending; a zero-based review of G&A expenses; enhanced approval requirements for material commitments; and quarterly reporting on cost reductions, cash runway, and capital use. The firm also urged the board to retain independent legal advisers and commission a review of oversight, disclosure controls, contracting, compensation, and capital-allocation processes. Kaos cited "numerous legal matters and shareholder demands" disclosed in Capricor's public filings, including securities and derivative actions, a Section 220 books-and-records demand, a patent action, a distribution dispute, and employment-related claims. A further securities class action was filed against the company and certain officers in 2026. "This legal overhang carries cost, distraction, reputational risk, and governance consequences," the letter stated. Kaos emphasized it is not asking Capricor to abandon deramiocel, which it believes "may still have meaningful value for patients." Instead, the firm wants the company to use its cash and public-company platform to build a broader, multi-modality biotechnology enterprise. The proposed M&A committee should evaluate assets in inflammation, fibrosis, tissue repair, targeted delivery, and regenerative medicine, the letter said. Kaos specifically pointed to advanced small-molecule pharmacology targeting the NLRP3/inflammasome signaling pathway as one area of interest. "Conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome," Arviv wrote. The activist push comes as Capricor awaits the FDA's decision on deramiocel. The agency's action date is August 22, though the timeline has grown complicated. After the advisory committee's negative vote in June, Capricor said the FDA was willing to review an amendment containing 24-month Hope-3 data focused on upper-limb function. A new target date has not been formally announced. Roth Capital expects the FDA review could be extended by approximately three months to accommodate the additional data. Kaos said it is prepared to work constructively with the board but warned of escalation if its demands are not met. If the board does not confirm and convene the requested meeting within the specified timeframe, Kaos said it will begin seeking shareholder support to elect its two independent nominees, replace directors, and potentially pursue removal of senior management. "We do not take that step lightly, but continued inaction would leave shareholders no reasonable alternative," the letter read.

Read the article

9/29/2026

Flashlight Capital Urges Secom to Raise Stake in Korea’s S-1

Bloomberg (09/29/26) Lee, Youkyung

Flashlight Capital Partners is pressing Japan’s Secom (TYO: 9735) to significantly increase its ownership of South Korea’s S-1 Corp. (KRX: 012750) and Taiwan Secom (TPE: 9917), arguing that greater control could accelerate international growth and improve shareholder value. Flashlight, which owns less than 1% of Secom, wants the Japanese security-services company to raise its stakes in both businesses to at least 50%. According to Flashlight, this could increase Secom’s revenue generated outside Japan to approximately 28% of total sales, compared with 5.4% currently and Secom’s own target of 10% by March 2028. The investor is also calling for more ambitious growth and profitability objectives and wants Secom to evaluate whether its current management is best positioned to achieve them. Flashlight CEO Sanghyun Lee said the proposed changes could support a significant revaluation of Secom’s shares, estimating a potential price of ¥10,000. The campaign follows Flashlight’s recent unsuccessful attempt to acquire S-1 shares held by Samsung Group affiliates. After those affiliates rejected its offer, Flashlight urged them to sell their holdings through an open auction. Secom currently owns 25.65% of S-1 and 26.75% of Taiwan Secom. Flashlight notes that S-1 generates revenue equivalent to about 24% of Secom’s, but Secom does not consolidate it under applicable accounting rules.

Read the article

9/29/2026

Netmarble, Align Partners Compete for Coway Shares

The Chosun Daily (09/29/26) Kang-han, Kim

Netmarble (KRX: 251270), a game company, is engaged in a share acquisition competition with Align Partners over Coway (KRX: 021240). Netmarble is Coway’s largest shareholder, but as Align publicly declared its intention to influence Coway’s management and increased its stake, Netmarble has responded by acquiring additional shares. The share competition between the two parties has driven Coway’s stock price significantly higher. A gaming industry insider said, “Following last year’s revision of the Commercial Act, which expanded the scope of directors’ fiduciary duty from the company to ‘the company and its shareholders’ with the goal of enhancing shareholder value, companies can no longer ignore shareholders. This is an unprecedented case of a domestic game company competing with a fund over shares.” Netmarble became Coway’s largest shareholder in 2020 by acquiring a 25.08% stake from Woongjin ThinkBig (KRX: 095720). Since then, Coway has served as a reliable non-game business cash cow for Netmarble. In the game industry, where a failed new title can result in hundreds of billions of won in development costs being wasted, Coway’s rental business, which guarantees stable income, has been a boon for Netmarble. Indeed, Coway, South Korea’s top rental company, reported consolidated revenue of 1.4422 trillion Korean won in the second quarter, up 14.6% year-on-year, and operating profit of 253.2 billion Korean won, a 4.3% increase. Over the past three years, Netmarble earned approximately 300 billion Korean won in equity-method profits and 109.8 billion Korean won in dividend income from Coway. However, the competition began in March when Align Partners, a fund established in 2021, increased its stake in Coway to over 5% and declared its investment purpose as “influencing management.” Align, which first invested in Coway in the first half of 2024, has steadily increased its stake and even recommended a candidate for outside director at the March shareholders’ meeting. Netmarble won the vote, and Align’s plan to join the board failed. At the time, Align also demanded the resignation of Netmarble founder Bang Joon-hyuk, who serves as Coway's board chairman. Although its demands were not met at the shareholders' meeting, Align has increased its stake to 6.21% as of September 21. In response, Netmarble announced in April that it would acquire additional Coway shares worth 150 billion Korean won, aiming to raise its stake to the high 20% range. Netmarble's stake has risen from 25.8% to 27.5% as of September 21. As both sides rush to acquire shares, Coway's stock price has surged from 72,200 Korean won on March 9 to 99,300 Korean won on September 21, a 37.5% increase. The gap in stake percentages between the two parties appears to be over 20 percentage points, seemingly favoring Netmarble. However, Align’s ability to rally minority shareholders means Netmarble cannot afford to be complacent. Recently, under the government’s shareholder rights protection policy, general shareholders have increasingly sided with funds demanding stronger shareholder returns. Indeed, at Coway’s shareholders’ meeting, the motion to appoint Align’s recommended outside director candidate received 56% approval from non-controlling shareholders, and 57.5% of general shareholders supported Align’s proposal to compose the audit committee entirely of outside directors. Align has also criticized Netmarble’s management decisions. Netmarble pledged to use 1.7 trillion Korean won of the 2.7 trillion Korean won raised during its 2017 IPO for game development but instead invested 1.74 trillion Korean won in acquiring Coway, which Align claims is an unrelated stake acquisition. As Align’s offensive intensified, Coway raised its shareholder return rate from 20% to 40% and introduced quarterly dividends starting this year to appease general shareholders. An investment industry insider said, “From the activist fund’s perspective, it is better to compete over Coway, a solid business, rather than Netmarble, whose performance fluctuates depending on game success. Whether through dividends or rising stock prices due to management disputes, both sides can profit.”

Read the article

9/29/2026

Irenic Plans to Vote Against Independence Realty's Purchase of Centerspace

TradingView (09/29/26)

Irenic said it plans to vote against Independence Realty Trust's (NYSE: IRT) planned $8.1 billion purchase of Centerspace (NYE: CSR). Irenic, which collectively owns a 2% stake together with affiliates in IRT, is opposed to the Centerspace CSR deal and wants IRT to consider strategic alternatives. The investor believes that both private equity firms and strategic buyers would be interested and may be willing to pay a “meaningful premium” of $18 to $20 a share." At least one other significant shareholder is also against the Centerspace CSR deal and agrees that IRT selling itself is better for shareholders, according to a Bloomberg report on Monday. "We will put the punchline upfront," Irenic co-founders Adam Katz, Andy Dodge, and Managing Director Tom Stults wrote in a letter to the IRT board on Tuesday. "We are opposed to the potential acquisition of Centerspace announced on September 9th, 2026. The acquisition lacks industrial logic, runs counter to the company's long-stated strategy of maintaining its predominantly Sunbelt exposure, and, most importantly, is a far inferior alternative to a better course for IRT shareholders: selling IRT itself." Irenic said that any bids for IRT at or about $18 would command "substantial" support and the board should engage with any serious buyer. Independence Realty IRT didn't immediately respond to Seeking Alpha's email request for comment. Earlier this month, Independence Realty Trust IRT and Centerspace CSR agreed to merge in an all-stock transaction that will create a multifamily real estate investment trust with an enterprise value of about $8.1B and more than 44,000 apartment units. Shares of IRT fell 4.3% the day the deal was announced on Sept. 9.

Read the article

9/28/2026

Youngpoong, MBK Demand Director Choi's Retreat From Korea Zinc Management

Business Korea (09/28/26) Sung-soo, Hur

Marking two years since the initiation of a public tender offer for Korea Zinc (KRX: 010130), Youngpoong (KRX: 000670), and MBK Partners demanded the resignation of Korea Zinc Director Choi Yun-beom from front-line management. They argued that the responsibility of the management must be investigated, raising issues with investments in the One Asia Partners fund, the acquisition of Igneo Holdings, and the borrowings that increased during the management control dispute. In a statement released on Sept. 28, Youngpoong and MBK stated, “Director Choi Yun-beom stepping down from front-line management is the starting point for normalizing the corporate governance of Korea Zinc.” Since commencing the public tender offer for Korea Zinc shares on Sept. 13, 2024, Youngpoong and MBK have consistently raised issues regarding the investment of company funds into entertainment companies, the acquisition of the American electronic waste company Igneo Holdings, and the board of directors’ supervisory function during this process. They claimed that a total of 69 billion won (about $50.5 million) was invested through the One Asia Partners fund, created with Korea Zinc funds, into unlisted entertainment companies such as Arc Media, Hi-Hat, and Slingshot, where Director Choi's family had invested personal funds. Youngpoong and MBK explained that among these, Hi-Hat and Slingshot have fallen into a state of complete capital impairment, and a risk of loss has also emerged in the investment related to Arc Media. Their position is that it is necessary to verify the investment decision-making and the process by which follow-up investments by the fund financed by Korea Zinc were made after the preceding investments by Director Choi's family. Youngpoong and MBK stated, “The Securities and Futures Commission resolved on heavy disciplinary action regarding this due to the omission of disclosures on transactions with specially related persons and violations of accounting standards,” adding, “The reality of a breach of trust transaction, which promoted the private interests of an individual family using company assets and passed the losses entirely onto Korea Zinc and general shareholders, has been confirmed through the disposition of a state agency.” They also brought up the fact that funds from the Havana No. 1 Fund, managed by One Asia Partners, were used in transactions related to the alleged market manipulation case that arose during Kakao's acquisition of SM Entertainment. Youngpoong and MBK argued that the proposal and approval process for the relevant investment, as well as whether Korea Zinc's management was aware of the purpose of the fund usage, must be verified. Regarding the acquisition of Igneo Holdings, they also took issue with the investment decision-making process and whether the board of directors provided supervision. Korea Zinc previously invested approximately 580 billion won ($446.15 million) in the American electronic waste company Igneo Holdings. They also pointed out that Korea Zinc's borrowings have significantly increased since the management control dispute. According to Youngpoong and MBK, Korea Zinc borrowed more than 2 trillion won externally while proceeding with a public tender offer for treasury shares worth 1.8 trillion won. Accordingly, borrowings on a separate basis increased from 387.6 billion won at the end of 2023 to 3.9966 trillion won at the end of 2024. The annual interest expense also rose from 25.6 billion won in 2023 to 153.1 billion won in 2025. External borrowings on a consolidated basis increased from about 800 billion won at the end of 2023 to about 7.5 trillion won at the end of June this year, Youngpoong and MBK explained. During the same period, cash and cash equivalents decreased from about 2 trillion won to the level of 1.6 trillion won. Youngpoong and MBK also brought up issues such as the capital increase by general public offering worth 2.5 trillion won that Korea Zinc pushed forward and then withdrew in 2024, and circular shareholding utilizing the overseas affiliate SMC. Youngpoong and MBK stated, “Clearly holding Director Choi Yun-beom accountable and excluding him from front-line management is an inevitable first step to normalize Korea Zinc's management and financial structure,” adding, “It is a process of normalizing corporate governance to return legitimate rights to shareholders by rebuilding an independent and responsible board of directors.”

Read the article