6/10/2025

Kohl’s Closed 27 Stores in 2025. Experts Fear More Closures Amidst Fulfillment Center Shutdowns

RetailWire (06/10/25) Giacomazzo, Bernadette

Kohl’s (KSS) is facing severe headwinds in 2025. After shuttering 27 stores this year and announcing the closure of multiple e-commerce fulfillment centers, the question on many shoppers’ minds is whether more locations are next. As the retail landscape continues to shift away from traditional department stores, Kohl’s is trying to prove it can still survive — and thrive. But the numbers and the strategy behind them paint a more complicated picture. At the start of the year, Kohl’s confirmed in a Jan. 9 press release that it would be closing 27 stores nationwide. The company emphasized that these closures represented less than 3% of its approximately 1,150 locations. While that number might seem small, it signals a larger restructuring effort that may just be beginning. The closures followed a year of ongoing financial decline. Kohl’s has posted 12 consecutive fiscal quarters of decreasing sales and saw its stock price drop over 50% in 2024 alone. The company has also undergone executive changes, with interim CEO Michael Bender now leading the charge and trying to shift the narrative. Despite continued sales declines, Bender expressed optimism on the May 29 earnings call, highlighting improved gross margins and a long-term commitment to efficiency. Kohl’s is also making significant cuts to its logistics operations. In May, the company shut down its e-commerce distribution center in San Bernardino, California, after its lease expired, per the same company press release announcing the 27 store closures. This week, the company announced closure of its Monroe e-Fulfillment Center in Middletown, Ohio. The move will affect more than 700 employees, including 664 material handlers and 33 e-fulfillment supervisors. Layoffs are set to begin on Sept. 12. “This was a difficult decision, and one we did not take lightly,” Bender said in a statement. “Ultimately, it’s a necessary step to strengthen our operational discipline, drive greater cost efficiency, and ensure the long-term health of our business — for our customers, our associates, and the future of our company.” Kohl’s Chief Financial Officer Jill Timm confirmed during the May earnings call that the company is now focusing on expanding its existing 900,000-square-foot fulfillment center in Plainfield, Indiana, a strategic move that consolidates operations and cuts costs. Kohl’s insists it’s not abandoning brick-and-mortar retail. The company stated that it “continues to believe in the health and strength of its profitable store base.” However, the closures suggest a sharpened focus on profitability and a willingness to make tough decisions. Former CEO Michelle Gass and current leadership have long sought ways to revitalize the brand, including store redesigns, partnerships with Sephora, and a renewed emphasis on private-label goods. But none of these changes have reversed the steady decline in sales. In fact, with consumer behavior shifting more rapidly toward e-commerce and off-price competitors, Kohl’s may be forced to re-evaluate its presence in certain regions altogether. While no official list of future closures has been released, industry experts suggest that more underperforming stores could face the chopping block in late 2025 or early 2026 — especially in overlapping or oversaturated markets. Behind the scenes, Kohl’s is still dealing with investor pressure. In 2022, activist investors pushed for radical changes, including selling off real estate assets, spinning off the digital arm, or even taking the company private. Those proposals were ultimately rejected, but the message was clear: shareholders want results. Kohl’s has shown some signs of stabilizing, with a slight improvement in gross margins during Q1 of 2025. But stabilizing isn’t the same as growing, and the reality remains that Kohl’s is fighting to stay relevant in a retail sector where department stores are becoming increasingly obsolete. With 27 stores and two warehouses already closed in 2025 — and more than 1,000 employees laid off — Kohl’s is clearly in a state of transition. Whether this strategy results in a long-term turnaround or continued contraction remains to be seen. For now, Kohl’s leadership remains publicly optimistic. But the writing on the wall suggests that more closures could be on the horizon, especially as the company tries to balance shareholder expectations with the operational realities of 21st-century retail.

Read the article

6/10/2025

PENN Entertainment Pushes Back on ISS Recommendation

Gambling News (06/10/25) Dimitrov, Deyan

Responding to a critical report by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), PENN Entertainment (PENN) attempted to reassure shareholders ahead of a crucial vote for two board positions. The ISS report urged shareholders to vote for the three board nominees presented by activist investor HG Vora. PENN’s upcoming annual meeting on June 17, 2025, will include a key vote that could significantly shake up the company’s leadership amidst ongoing challenges. In a damning report, ISS criticized PENN’s strategic direction and oversight, describing the company’s performance as “disappointing” and referring to a series of acquisitions and online gaming initiatives that did not deliver adequate shareholder returns. The report urged stakeholders to help implement radical changes in the company’s leadership by voting for HG Vora-backed William Clifford, Johnny Hartnett, and Carlos Ruisanchez. PENN Entertainment, however, countered ISS’s claims by arguing that ISS had neglected to consider crucial details and had mischaracterized its engagement with both the dissident investor and the broader shareholder base. While PENN concurred with ISS on supporting Hartnett and Ruisanchez, the company challenged the nomination of William Clifford, who served as CFO until 2013. “During his time as PENN’s CFO, Mr. Clifford advocated against key initiatives that were critical to succeeding in a competitive market.” According to PENN, Clifford’s recent interview with the board revealed an outdated perspective significantly misaligned with the rapidly changing gaming and entertainment environment. The group has made it clear that it believes Clifford’s re-inclusion into the boardroom would be counterproductive for long-term growth. PENN’s release also underscored its ongoing difficulties dealing with HG Vora. The company outlined that it had made numerous attempts to reach an agreement regarding board representation. However, it was rebuffed at every turn. PENN also drew attention to regulatory complications, alleging that the activist investor’s attempts to dodge licensing rules in several states would hinder its influence on governance. The company responded to shareholder concerns by noting that recent strategic initiatives such as partnerships, cost reductions, and leadership shifts would help it recover. Critics have drawn attention to PENN’s inconclusive online betting strategy and the underperformance of its interactive division. However, the operator remains convinced that its investments in the digital sector will pay off, especially after several recent high-profile partnerships. “The Board and management team remain committed to creating value for all shareholders and will continue to take actions in support of that objective.” With the shareholder meeting less than two weeks away, the tension between HG Vora and PENN continues unabated, with the company remaining adamant that its initiatives will result in sustainable growth. As discussions rage on, the upcoming vote could prove pivotal for the future direction of one of America’s largest gaming operators.

Read the article

6/10/2025

Activist Investor Demands Keros 'Aggressively' Cut Costs Just Weeks After Layoffs

Fierce Biotech (06/10/25) Waldron, James

Keros Therapeutics’ (KROS) pledge to hand $375 million to shareholders has not been enough to appease activist investor demands to slash further costs just weeks after the biotech laid off staff. The company confirmed Monday afternoon that its board had “unanimously determined to initiate a process to return $375 million of excess capital to stockholders,” although the “terms and structure of this capital return remain under consideration.” The move “reflects a thorough review of our capital requirements, feedback from our stockholders, and our confidence in the potential for Keros to provide meaningful and potentially disease-modifying benefits to patients,” the board's lead independent director Jean-Jacques Bienaimé said in the June 9 statement. The company made the call in the wake of a stakeholder meeting June 4 during which activist investor ADAR1 Capital Management, which owns 13.3% of Keros’ stock, led a rebellion against the reappointment of two members of the biotech’s board. In its own statement yesterday, ADAR1 pointed to the fact that only about a third of shareholders voted for the two board members as evidence of “widespread dissatisfaction” with the company’s direction. The investor applauded Keros’ decision last month to end development of a phase 2 candidate designed to treat high blood pressure in the lungs along with a related move to lay off 45% of the biotech’s team. “While these delayed actions are directionally positive, they are wholly insufficient and, in our view, are overshadowed by the board's baffling decision to return only a modest portion of the company's excess capital to stockholders,” ADAR1 added. The investment firm instead called for the biotech to “take immediate and concrete action to reduce costs more aggressively” as well as to raise the amount being handed to shareholders by a further $100 million to $475 million. Takeda paid $200 million upfront in December for Keros’ activin inhibitor elritercept, which is being developed to treat anemia seen in blood cancers, and ADAR1 also demanded yesterday that Keros establish a mechanism for stockholders to “directly capture the potential cash flow” from this partnership. “If the board nevertheless insists on clinging to a failed strategy, ADAR1 will not hesitate to hold it accountable, including by nominating new directors for election at the 2026 Annual Meeting,” ADAR1 warned. Massachusetts-based Keros has gone to efforts this year to shield itself from investor pressure, including adjusting its stockholder rights plan in April to inflict a penalty on anyone who accumulates more than 10% of the biotech’s outstanding shares without the board’s approval. The company made this move in response to “significant and rapid accumulations” of stock by “a number of investors who have indicated a desire to influence the control of Keros,” the biotech explained at the time. Keros has struggled this year, kicking off 2025 with the announcement that it would be ending a midphase study of its high blood pressure candidate after observing pericardial effusion adverse events, which refers to an excessive buildup of fluid in the sac surrounding the heart. Keros has since positioned itself around a phase 1 neuromuscular disease program called KER-065, with an initial focus on Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Read the article

6/10/2025

Toyota Supplier Hit with Criticism at Shareholder Meeting Over $33 Billion Deal

Reuters (06/10/25) Shiraki, Maki

Some investors in Toyota Industries (TYIDY) voiced disapproval of a $33 billion buyout offer on Tuesday, adding to criticism that the bid from Japanese parent Toyota Motor (TM) was unfair to minority shareholders. The 4.7 trillion yen ($33 billion) offer to take the forklift maker private has already come under fire from international shareholders including London-based Zennor Asset Management and Hong Kong-based Oasis Management. But on Tuesday, domestic shareholders at what is likely to be the company's last annual general meeting before it is taken private, also expressed their concerns about the plan. The world's top-selling automaker plans to take Toyota Industries private in a complex, multi-part transaction that includes an offer price of 16,300 yen a share. The price, some shareholders have said, undervalues the supplier's intrinsic value and strengthens the founding Toyoda family's control over the broader group. "I don't think I am the only one who feels the price is too low," said one shareholder at the meeting. Another said the acquisition would lead to the "domination" of Toyota Industries, one of Toyota's key suppliers, by the automaker. The meeting ran for almost 2 hours, its longest ever, the company said. Toyota Industries' executives also took some two dozen questions from shareholders, the most ever. On Thursday Toyota chairman Akio Toyoda may face similar questions at the automaker's annual general meeting. Toyota has said the acquisition would allow Toyota Industries to deepen collaboration with group companies, without concerns of short-term profit targets, as Toyota itself becomes a broader "mobility company." Under the deal, a new holding company will be set up. Unlisted real estate company Toyota Fudosan will invest 180 billion yen while Toyoda, the founder's grandson, will invest 1 billion yen. Toyota Motor will invest 700 billion yen for non-voting preferred shares. "This was not a decision that neglected minority shareholders, but rather one that was taken with all the factors in mind," Toyota Industries' President Koichi Ito told shareholders. Oasis, which has shares in both Toyota Motor and Toyota Industries, said on Friday it would push for a higher price. Zennor and some others have said the price undervalues the substantial real estate on Toyota Industries's books. Toyota Industries had 1.5 trillion yen of property, plants and equipment on its balance sheet as of the end of March, a number that reflects the cost paid for the assets, minus depreciation, rather than their current market value. Toyota Group companies hold at least 39% of Toyota Industries, according to LSEG data and the deal is widely expected to go through. Shares finished at 16,300 yen on Tuesday. Toyota Industries, formerly Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, was founded in 1926 to make automatic looms. An automotive division within the company was set up and later spun off as Toyota Motor.

Read the article

6/9/2025

Japan Finally Ignites Foreign Investor Interest After Decade-long Governance Push

Nikkei Asia (06/09/25) Nagumo, Jada

This June marks the tenth anniversary of Japan's adoption of the Corporate Governance Code, which set rules for shareholder rights, disclosures and more. The code was nonbinding but took direct aim at ineffective boards and encouraged listed companies to be more transparent. Although change has only come gradually, foreign investors are finally seeing signs of companies becoming more receptive to reevaluating their capital allocation strategies, especially following a series of policy initiatives, as well as pressure from the increasing presence of activist investors. Investment momentum is also gaining in Japan as demand for U.S. dollar assets wanes due to the Trump administration's aggressive, and at times confusing, tariff policies. Further, as confidence in the Chinese economy also wavers, investors are betting on corporate Japan to seize a golden opportunity. "The level of discussions and engagements with Japanese companies has gone up a hundredfold in the last 10 years," notes David Baran, co-founder of Singapore-based Symphony Financial Partners. Improved governance was a pillar of late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's economic policies -- known as "Abenomics." When the code was adopted in 2015, some companies went in for box-ticking exercises rather than striving to increase corporate value. However, foreign investors are saying that things are speeding up thanks to the Tokyo Stock Exchange's recent push. In 2023, the TSE requested companies to be more conscious of their capital costs and stock prices, and asked for the disclosure of concrete action plans. "There was no big bang moment in which everything changed," said Alexander Treves, head of investment specialists for APAC equities at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. "Japanese culture can be quite incremental, but if we compare Japan now versus 10 years ago, not just in terms of sentiment but the magnitude of share buybacks, the unwinding of cross-shareholdings, the quantum of dividends being paid, things look much better now." In 2024, Japan Inc. engaged in record share buybacks, with over 1,000 companies pledging a total of 16.81 trillion yen ($108 billion) in repurchases. The amount of dividends paid in the previous fiscal year also jumped by 16% from a year earlier to 23 trillion yen, according to Nomura Securities. The Japanese brokerage forecasts another 10% rise in the current fiscal year ending March 2026. The decline of cross-shareholdings, a defense against foreign takeovers that emerged after measures to liberalize capital transactions in Japan during the 1960s, has also been eye-catching. A report by J.P. Morgan highlighted that divestment in cross-shareholdings is accelerating in Japan, with over 7 trillion yen recorded in the fiscal year ending March 2024. Major nonlife insurers have vowed to sell their entire cross-shareholdings, and Toyota Motor will further slash its strategically held shares now that key parts supplier Toyota Industries has accepted a takeover bid. Moves to offload noncore business assets are also taking place, primarily in real estate. The pressure is on, not just from policymakers but also investors, including so-called activist funds. Shareholder activism has boomed in Japan, with 108 campaigns launched in 2024, up 74% compared to 2018, according to Diligent Market Intelligence. The phenomenon is not unique to Japan. Shareholder activism is also picking up across Asia, particularly in South Korea and Taiwan as these economies push ahead with government-backed corporate governance reforms. Elliott Investment Management, one of the world's largest activist funds, has recognized the rate of change in Japan's governance transformation. According to sources familiar with the matter, the U.S. hedge fund is expanding its Japan investment team and is ramping up activities in the country with plans to deploy more capital. Investors and experts believe there is scope for further improvement. Tsuyoshi Maruki, founder and CEO of Japan-based Strategic Capital, said change has mostly been visible at larger companies with a higher ratio of foreign investors and that smaller companies still have a long way to go in terms of governance transformation. The ex-executive of the now-defunct Murakami Fund went further. "There are still a lot of management, as well as outside directors, who do not fully understand what capital cost is," he said. "The TSE and Financial Services Agency have worked hard, but companies are not keeping up." Capital cost measures what companies pay to finance their operations and investments, and can help investors -- who wish for companies to maximize shareholder value -- calculate an expected return on investment. Corporate Japan "has not met international best practice yet in areas such as board diversity and having a majority independent board," said Jen Sisson, CEO of the International Corporate Governance Network. While it is the norm in the U.S. and U.K., only 25% of Japanese companies listed on the TSE's Prime section have a majority independent board, data from Daiwa Institute of Research shows. Added Sisson: "I would strongly encourage Japanese authorities to continue pushing companies to publish their securities report before their annual general meetings. Japan is extremely unusual in having these documents published after the AGM. Sharing the materials with shareholders before will be a massive step forward." In response to criticism and foreign investor demand, Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato in March asked all listed companies to disclose information before their AGMs. Symphony Financial Partners thinks Japanese companies can do more with the cash they are sitting on. Co-founder Kazuhiko Shibata said companies can use their capital for mergers and acquisitions to seek higher returns. "It's not just buybacks and dividends. There are more opportunities and ways to use the cash that is piling [up] in their accounts, and more investors should recognize that too," he said. Japanese companies continue to accumulate cash on their balance sheets. Despite strong profit growth over the past decade, return on equity has remained stagnant, with many companies below 10%. In the U.S., more than 30% of companies churn out ROEs of above 20%. "Japan has become more interesting in our view based on attractive valuations, governance improvements and the positive change in business strategy that we have seen across multiple sectors," said James Smith, founder and chief investment officer of London-based Palliser Capital. "It feels to us like many companies have moved from a reluctant acceptance that they ought to change to a constructive acceptance of the need to change." Smith added that a shift among local Japanese asset managers has been a refreshing development in that more are willing to support change and agree to shareholder proposals. In the past decade, Japan's benchmark Nikkei Stock Index has nearly doubled. Last year it rose to an all-time high of 42,224.02. Meanwhile, the index's average price-to-book ratio, which measures the market capitalization of a company relative to its book value, is around 1.4. The S&P 500 has a P/B ratio of around 5. "Japan's economic power is weakening relative to the rest of the world," warned Strategic Capital's Maruki. "Companies need to improve capital efficiency and help revitalize the economy." Backed by their cross-shareholdings, Japanese companies were able to protect themselves from hostile takeovers and strengthen relationships with business partners. However, Japan's lack of innovation and waning competitiveness have led to the need for companies to streamline their operations. Companies in Japan -- as well as those in South Korea and Taiwan -- that are making this shift offer investors who have won big on Western bourses a chance to repeat their success. "The genie is out of the bottle," J.P. Morgan Asset Management's Treves said. "Not enough foreign investors have caught on to Japan's changes, but we think they will soon."

Read the article

6/9/2025

Elliott Calls for Sumitomo Realty Improvement in Rare Letter

Bloomberg (06/09/25) Du, Lisa

Elliott Investment Management is calling for Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. (8830) to improve shareholder returns and corporate governance, saying the Japanese real estate developer’s stock is worth 40% more than its current value. The New York-based investment firm released a public letter Monday, saying it would vote against Tokyo-based Sumitomo Realty’s senior management at the upcoming annual shareholders meeting if there’s no meaningful progress made on improving its value. The letter is a rare public move by Elliott, which has kept quiet on most of its Japan investments. In the past year, news reports have unveiled the firm’s activist engagement with companies like Tokyo Gas Co. (9531), Mitsui Fudosan Co. (8801), and SoftBank Group Corp. (9984). Shares of Sumitomo Realty rose 0.7% to ¥5,540 on Monday in Tokyo. The stock has gained about 13% this year. A Sumitomo Realty representative said in a statement that the company has had constructive discussions with Elliott on improving returns and corporate governance, and will continue to do so. Citigroup Inc. analyst Masashi Miki said Sumitomo Realty has already made progress on addressing the demands raised by Elliott, including in its recently published midterm plan. Still, pressure for improvements in governance and shareholder returns is likely to keep building in the broader Japanese property sector, Miki wrote in a note to investors. Elliott said Sumitomo Realty is one of the most undervalued real estate developers in Japan, assessing that its stock is worth at least ¥8,000, based on the valuation of its real estate holdings and peer companies. It called on the company to unwind its cross-shareholdings in companies such as Taisei Corp. and Obayashi Corp., increase its shareholder payout ratio to 50% or more and set a return-on-equity target of at least 10%. Elliott owned a 2.99% stake in Sumitomo Realty at the end of March, according to public filings from the company. In the letter, the investment fund said it has built up a more than 3% holding. In Japan, shareholders who have held 3% of a company for more than six months can call a special meeting. Most of Elliott’s Japan investments have focused on boosting returns through share buybacks, selling off older real estate holdings and unwinding equity stakes in other companies. Sumitomo Realty’s annual shareholder meeting is scheduled for June 27.

Read the article

6/9/2025

BP Puts AI at the Heart of Its Efforts to Boost Performance

Bloomberg (06/09/25) Ferman, Mitchell

When engineers prepare to drill for oil, they know the spot deep underground where the well must end and can choose their starting point, but there are many possible routes in between. Optimizing that subsurface path — evaluating geological opportunities and challenges to ensure a successful job — has been a time-consuming task for engineers. Now, through BP Plc’s (BP) technology center in Houston, a new AI-powered tool is dramatically streamlining the process and running thousands of scenarios to determine the best trajectory. “It basically takes the time it would’ve taken people to do that from months down to days,” said BP Executive Vice President of Technology Emeka Emembolu. The technology “is a massive game changer and it’s getting us better outcomes in the wells we’re drilling.” Artificial intelligence is being used by many companies across the oil industry. Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) deployed the technology to help develop its flagship offshore discovery in Guyana. Autonomous drilling has played a role in productivity improvements seen in the US shale industry. The potential for this technology to deliver significant gains in operational efficiency has particular relevance for BP. Under pressure from unhappy shareholders and activist investor Elliott Investment Management, the company is seeking to reverse a long period of poor performance by boosting growth and profitability. After several years of focusing on clean energy, oil drilling has renewed importance as BP pivots back toward fossil fuels. The financial targets that underpin Chief Executive Officer Murray Auchincloss’s strategy reset all require doing more with less — curbing capital expenditure, cutting costs, raising returns and giving more cash to shareholders. To help achieve these goals, BP is pushing AI into every part of its operations, Emembolu said. “Our technology agenda is central to growing oil and gas, central to helping us focus our downstream business and to invest in the transition with discipline,” Emembolu said. The drilling optimization tool is already being used in fields from the Gulf of Mexico — a key driver of US oil output growth this year — to Azerbaijan, where BP earlier this month advanced a $2.9 billion natural gas project. In the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico, where BP plans significant investments in shale oil production, Emembolu said an AI-generated “morning report” is directing field hands to sites most urgently in need of work and reduce the amount of time spent driving across the sprawling basin’s roads. Near Chicago, where BP’s Whiting refinery processes large volumes of crude from Canada, the company is working with Palantir Technologies Inc. to embed data engineers to optimize processes on site to reduce costs and improve operational uptime. Disruption at the facility can have a significant impact on BP’s earnings, such as in the first quarter of 2024 when a storm led to a lengthy shutdown. The technology is also being used outside of core oil and gas businesses — identifying optimal locations for the fastest electric-vehicle chargers; helping Indian motorists avoid lines at fuel stations with mobile notifications; advising German convenience store managers on how many pastries to bake each morning. “In terms of costs, we’re looking at things from all scales,” Emembolu said. “Nothing is too big or too small for us to look at.”

Read the article

6/9/2025

Activist Hedge Fund Builds Stake in Ozempic-maker Novo Nordisk

Financial Times (06/09/25) Barnes, Oliver; Kuchler, Hannah

Activist hedge fund Parvus Asset Management is building a stake in Ozempic-maker Novo Nordisk (NVO) as the drugmaker hunts for a new chief executive following a share price slump. The London-based hedge fund, which has previously engaged airline Ryanair (RYAAY) and gambling group Flutter Entertainment (FLUT), wants to influence the appointment of Novo Nordisk’s new chief, according to people with knowledge of the details. Shares in Novo Nordisk have fallen 50% over the past year. A combination of disappointing trial results for its new obesity drug and lower than expected sales figures led investors to conclude that it was losing ground to its U.S. rival Eli Lilly (LLY) in the weight-loss market. Last month, it announced that chief executive Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen would be stepping down earlier than planned, although he remains in post until a successor is found. Although it is no longer Europe's largest listed company, Novo Nordisk still has a market capitalization of $334 billion. Parvus did not disclose the size of its stake in Novo Nordisk and, under Danish securities rules, does not need to if it owns less than 5% of the company. The activist has total shareholdings of £5.2 billion, according to Bloomberg data. Novo Nordisk, Parvus, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the drugmaker’s largest shareholder, declined to comment. The Novo Nordisk Foundation holds the majority of voting rights in the company, making it harder for an activist to influence its plans. The foundation’s chair, Lars Rebien Sørensen, who previously ran the drugmaker, has joined the board as an observer, as part of the process of finding a successor. Novo Nordisk cut its sales and profit forecasts last month, blaming the rapid expansion of replica obesity drugs in the U.S. These cheaper alternatives were temporarily allowed when there were shortages but have cut into the market share of branded versions. Activist investors have previously applied pressure to companies even where their shareholdings have been small: U.S. activist investors Starboard Value and Irenic Capital, for example, waged a multiyear campaign against Wall Street Journal parent company News Corp (NWSA) despite the Murdoch family having priority shareholdings. Parvus was co-founded in 2004 by former Merrill Lynch fund manager Edoardo Mercadante.

Read the article

6/9/2025

Glass Lewis Recommends Shareholders Vote “FOR” Both of PENN Entertainment’s Director Nominees on the WHITE Proxy Card

Business Wire (06/09/25)

PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) announced that Glass Lewis has recommended that shareholders vote “FOR” PENN’s two director nominees – Johnny Hartnett and Carlos Ruisanchez – on the Company’s WHITE proxy card in connection with the company’s upcoming 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 17. PENN issued the following statement in response, "We are pleased Glass Lewis recognizes the Board’s thorough review of all three of HG Vora’s nominees, our responsiveness to shareholder feedback regarding refreshment and the rigorous regulatory oversight of the gaming industry, in particular the restrictions imposed related to our engagement with HG Vora. Glass Lewis also acknowledges the strength and depth of the skills and experience our directors bring, in addition to our significant refreshment efforts. As we communicated to shareholders on May 19, 2025, we made the decision not to solicit proxies for the PENN White Card over the HG Vora Gold Card given that votes for Messrs. Hartnett and Ruisanchez on either card will be counted at the Annual Meeting. Following their elections, 75% of PENN’s directors will have joined the Board since 2019. The PENN Board and management team remain committed to prioritizing the best interests of all shareholders, and look forward to further advancing PENN’s strategy to deliver long-term value with a strengthened Board following the Annual Meeting."

Read the article