Media Center

Featuring all breaking news and in depth articles and editorial press coverage pertaining to shareholder activism and corporate governance.

Toyota Bows to Activist Pressure in $38 Billion Deal
Norwegian Cruise Line Forecasts Weak Annual Profit on Subdued Demand
Sabre Corporation Adopts Limited-Duration Shareholder Rights Plan
Doosan to Burn 3.12 Trillion Won in Shares
Elliott Says LSEG Can Do More After £3 Billion Buyback Move
Lululemon Founder Wilson Ramps Up Pressure on Board Amid Proxy Fight
Blackstone Reportedly in Talks on Competing Bid for MarineMax
Toyota Plans Around $19 Billion Share Sale by Financial Institutions, Sources Say
LSEG Plans $4.1 Billion Buyback Amid Investor Pressure
Smucker Jumps After Pact With Elliott on Directors
Janus Bidding War Begins as Victory Capital Tops Trian Offer
Siemens Energy Should Not 'Squander' Wind Division, Top-20 Investor Says
Caesars Entertainment Weighs Takeover Interest
Ancora Holdings Pushes Warner to Walk Away From Netflix Deal
MarineMax Attracts More Buyout Interest After Donerail Offer, Sources Say
Elliott Assures UK Over Future of LSE
South Korea Passes Corporate Reform Bill
Italian Gunmaker Beretta Launches Proxy Fight for U.S. Firearms Giant Sturm, Ruger & Co.
Activist Investor Prompts Sale of Charles River CDMO Business, U.S. and European Sites
Palliser Capital Seeks Court Order to Force Shareholder Proposals onto LG Chem AGM Agenda
Elliott Woos Shareholders Backing Toyota Industries Buyout, Sources Say
UK Court Annuls ISDS Ruling Ordering South Korea to Pay Elliott $107 Million
Japan's Top Business Lobby Put Off Private Meeting with Elliott
Activist Irenic Builds Stake in Ralliant, Pushes for Cost Cuts
PENN Settles With HG Vora, Appoints Three New Directors
Jack in the Box Sued by Investor Over Proxy-Vote Disclosure
Investor Ed Garden Builds Stake in Fortune Brands, Seeking New CEO
Jack in the Box, Facing Sardar Biglari, has a Tough Quarter
Toymaker Funko Pushed by Investor Pleasant Lake to Explore Strategic Options
Amex, Deere, J&J Abandon Board Diversity Rule, Activist Says
Shareholder Activism in Asia Drives Global Total to Record High
Dealmakers See More Retail Mergers and IPOs in 2026 After Tariffs Sidelined M&A Last Year
Target's Management Under Fire as Investors Agitate for Change
Korea's Market Rally Shifts Tone in Shareholder Activism
Commentary: LSEG's Elliott-Lite Playbook May Just Be Enough
The Activist vs the Carmaker: How Elliott Forced Toyota Into $35 Billion Showdown
Hedge Funds Are Betting Big on Industrials in 2026. Here Are Their Favorite Picks
Cevian and Artisan Partners Sink Their Teeth Into Pearson
Cruising for Trouble: Activist Investor Elliott Chastises Norwegian Board for CEO Picks
Investor Pressure Mounts: Shareholder Activism in Europe
Ancora Could See Multiple Ways to Win in Warner Bros. Fight
Commentary: Toyota Gets a Stinging Buyout Bloody Nose
Teradata Agrees to Board Changes With Lynrock Lake. The Stock Soars 22%.
Podcast: A Hedge Funds's $8 Billion Bet on Venezuela's Citgo
Toyota, Elliott Clash Over $35 Billion Buyout Bid: 5 Things to Know
Why Elliott Bet That LSEG Could Weather AI Storm
Proxy Voting: Asset Managers Increased Their Support for Management in 2025
HoldCo Asset Management Enters Wall Street Banks’ Cozy Club
Commentary: Toyota’s Buyout Options all Come With a Taint
Proxy Battle Crashes Jack’s Birthday Party
Investor Engagement Reshapes Appian’s Strategic Landscape
The GameStop CEO Has an Audacious Plan to Clinch His $35 Billion Payday
How Investors Turned a Toyota Buyout into a Battleground
Proxy-Voting Trends in 2025: Widening Gaps in Asset Manager Voting Preferences
Elliott Stands a Chance at Foiling Controversial Toyota Deal
Shareholder Activists Have Better Odds if Big 3 Stop Voting, Says Morningstar
A Decade After Campbell’s Soup, Dan Loeb’s Third Point Is Back
Canadian Companies Growing Wary Amid Increased Interest in Takeovers, Bank of America Exec Says
Commentary: Elliott's Toyota Bet Already Looks Golden
Insight: Shareholder Proposal Reform Must Center on Facts, Not Philosophy

3/2/2026

Toyota Bows to Activist Pressure in $38 Billion Deal

Financial Times (03/02/26) Keohane, David; Dempsey, Harry

Toyota (7203.T) has raised its offer to privatize its largest subsidiary, bowing to pressure from investors who had pushed for a higher price on a $38 billion deal that will reshape Japan’s biggest business empire. Elliott Management had engaged the carmaker over its attempt to take Toyota Industries (6201.T) private, accusing the company of underpaying and convincing shareholders not to tender. On Monday, as the tender deadline approached, Toyota said in a regulatory filing it was willing to increase the amount it would pay by 9.6%, valuing the subsidiary at ¥5.9 trillion ($37.8 billion). The regulatory filing said Toyota Fudosan, the affiliate leading the take-private, had determined that “obtaining the support of a greater number of shareholders is important for the completion of the tender offer” and that it had entered into an agreement with Elliott to buy all of the fund’s shares. The plans are contingent on Toyota Fudosan securing commitment letters from Japanese lenders to fund a higher bid. Elliott on Monday said the new price represented “an improved outcome for minority shareholders." Toyota unveiled its bid to take Toyota Industries, a key parts supplier and forklift maker, private last June at an offer price of ¥16,300 a share. The buyout was viewed as key to unwinding one of the group’s biggest crossholdings, an out-of-favor ownership model in which companies own shares in each other and that has been the target of corporate governance reform efforts. But it also attracted criticism from investors and corporate governance experts for its low offer and opaque valuation methods. After Elliott revealed a stake in Toyota Industries, the conglomerate in January raised its offer to ¥18,800 a share, later saying it was its “best possible price." Toyota raising its offer for a second time — to ¥20,600 a share — represents a significant victory for Elliott, which has waged a public and aggressive campaign to stop other shareholders agreeing to the deal. The carmaker was forced to extend a tender deadline last month after failing to win enough support. The U.S.-based fund had steadily increased its stake in Toyota Industries and owned 7.7%, according to Monday’s regulatory filing. That gives Elliott a roughly $3 billion position, based on current market prices. In its attempt to pressure Toyota, Elliott released a standalone plan for Toyota Industries — a nearly century-old company from which the carmaker was spun out — claiming it could boost longer-term value to more than ¥40,000 a share. The move went further than Elliott’s previous campaigns against SoftBank (9984.T), Toshiba, and Tokyo Gas (9531.T). The share price of Toyota Industries, the world’s largest forklift manufacturer, has stayed consistently above the offer level, leaving shareholders with little incentive to tender. Elliott and other investors had also made offers to individual shareholders for their stakes at levels above the offer price. Other investors and deal advisers in Tokyo said a victory for Elliott would embolden other campaigns and force companies to think harder about the prices they offer for subsidiaries in similar deals. Shareholders of Toyota Industries will now have until March 16 to decide whether to tender their shares.

Read the article

3/2/2026

Norwegian Cruise Line Forecasts Weak Annual Profit on Subdued Demand

Reuters (03/02/26) Kanatt, Neil J.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH.N) forecast annual profit below Wall Street expectations on Monday as demand for the cruise operator's higher-priced voyages was pressured by economic uncertainty. Shares of the company, as well as peers Carnival Corp (CCL.N) and Royal Caribbean (RCL.N), were down about 7% each in premarket trading, tracking a slump in the broader market due to the escalating conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran. Norwegian Cruise is facing a slowdown in new bookings as budget-conscious customers avoid splurging on expensive cruise vacations amid persistent inflation and tariff-driven uncertainty in the United States. The company said it entered 2026 against a pressured backdrop, with "certain execution missteps" hurting bookings. "Our priority is to act urgently to address these gaps by improving coordination, reinforcing accountability, and strengthening financial discipline across the organization," new CEO John Chidsey said. Earlier this month, Elliott Management said it has built a more than 10% stake in the cruise operator. The investor is pushing for a new business plan that delivers on available revenue opportunities at Norwegian to drive the share price, while criticizing the appointment of the company's management over the last decade, including that of CEO Chidsey last month. Increased fuel costs amid escalating global tensions, including in the Middle East, and expenses related to drydocks, ship deliveries, and maintenance are also weighing on the cruise operator's margins. The cruise operator now expects adjusted profit of $2.38 per share for fiscal 2026, compared with analysts' expectation of $2.55 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. Norwegian reported fourth-quarter revenue of $2.24 billion, compared with analysts' expectations of $2.35 billion.

Read the article

3/1/2026

Sabre Corporation Adopts Limited-Duration Shareholder Rights Plan

PRNewswire (03/01/26)

Sabre Corporation (NASDAQ: SABR) announced that its Board of Directors has approved the adoption of a limited-duration shareholder rights plan to protect the interests of Sabre and its shareholders. The plan is effective immediately and expires in one year. It was adopted in response to the substantial accumulation of shares of Sabre's common stock by Constellation Software Inc. (TSX: CSU). In deciding to adopt the Rights Plan, the Board considered, among other things, that: Between April 2025 and November 2025, Constellation accumulated a 9.7% economic position in Sabre, comprising 4.7% beneficial ownership of common stock and a further 5% via derivative instruments, and privately informed Sabre of its ownership stake for the first time in early January 2026; Constellation is a serial acquirer of software companies that build verticals, and one of its operating groups, Vela Software, has in recent years acquired several travel technology companies; In connection with its outreach in early January 2026, Constellation requested a board seat for two of its executives, and during the course of discussions with the Company, delivered a nomination notice under the Company's bylaws on January 23, 2026; Constellation previously suggested to Sabre its desire that its investment in Sabre be similar to its investment in Asseco Poland S.A. (OTCMKTS: ASOZF), where it currently holds a 24.8% position; Sabre engaged in constructive discussions with Constellation and began negotiating a strategic governance agreement to appoint the CEO of Constellation's Vela Software division to the Board and enable continued collaboration between the two parties with the goal of driving long-term growth and value creation; On February 26, 2026, despite the parties nearing the finish line on the agreement, Constellation abruptly and without explanation broke off several weeks of constructive negotiations and stated that its intentions "would appear clear with the benefit of time;" Sabre made multiple attempts to reengage Constellation on February 26 and February 27, 2026, that remain unanswered, and on February 28, 2026, Constellation withdrew the formal nomination of its second candidate (not the candidate who the parties had been contemplating would join the Board in connection with the proposed strategic governance agreement) without providing any explanation or otherwise responding to Sabre's requests to reengage; and during the week of February 23 through February 27, 2026, the Company observed unusually high trading volume in its stock. The Rights Plan was not adopted in response to any proposal from Constellation or another party to acquire control of the Sabre and is not intended to deter offers or preclude the Board from considering offers that are fair and otherwise in the best interest of the shareholders. Subject to understanding the basis for Constellation's changed posture, Sabre remains open to resuming discussions with Constellation regarding a negotiated agreement on acceptable terms. The Rights Plan is intended to enable all shareholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in Sabre and ensure they receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any proposed takeover. The Rights Plan is also intended to reduce the likelihood that any person or group gains control of the Company through open-market accumulation or other tactics without paying an appropriate control premium or providing the Board sufficient time to make informed decisions that are in the best interests of Sabre and its shareholders.

Read the article

2/27/2026

Doosan to Burn 3.12 Trillion Won in Shares

The Chosun Daily (South Korea) (02/27/26) Jaehyun, Cho

Doosan (KRX: 000150) announced that it will effectively burn all of its treasury shares within this year. The shares to be burned amount to approximately 2.57 million, valued at around 3.12 trillion Korean won based on the closing price on the day (1,215,000 won). Following the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment, which mandates the burning of treasury shares, in the National Assembly the previous day, analysts predict that pressure on companies to return value to shareholders will intensify. Doosan held a board meeting on the day and resolved to burn all remaining treasury shares (2,568,528 shares) except for 632,500 shares reserved for employee compensation within this year. This represents approximately 12.18% of the total issued shares. Burning treasury shares reduces the number of circulating shares, thereby increasing per-share value. Earlier, Doosan had announced plans to burn 990,000 treasury shares over three years from last year to this year, but this decision expands the scale of returns and accelerates the timeline. Once this burn is completed, the ownership stake of the founding family is expected to rise. The stake of Chairman Park Jeong-won, the largest shareholder, and his special interest parties will increase from 41.18% to 46.84%. The reduction in total shares strengthens control alongside the burn. Companies appear to be accelerating their moves following the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment. POSCO Holdings decided to burn 2% of its treasury shares at a board meeting on the 19th, worth 635.1 billion Korean won. This follows its earlier announcement to burn a total of 6% of treasury shares over three years starting in 2024. LG Chem will also present a shareholder proposal from Palliser Capital at its regular shareholders’ meeting next month. Palliser Capital has argued that LG Chem should reduce its stake in LG Energy Solution from 79.4% to 70% to secure cash and purchase and burn treasury shares. It cited the fact that LG Chem’s stock trades at a 74% discount to its net asset value as grounds for shareholder activism. A source from the business community stated, “With the passage of the third Commercial Act amendment, companies are aggressively using dividend increases and share burns, making it likely they will further accelerate shareholder returns in the future.”

Read the article

2/27/2026

Elliott Says LSEG Can Do More After £3 Billion Buyback Move

Bloomberg (02/27/26) Short, Meg

Elliott Investment Management, which has built a stake in London Stock Exchange Group Plc (LON: LSEG), said there’s “still an opportunity for further value-enhancing actions” after the bourse operator announced a £3 billion ($4.1 billion) share buyback. Paul Singer’s hedge fund said that’s a “positive first step,” according to a statement on Friday. LSEG’s “encouraging guidance, enhanced financial disclosures and improved communication on its AI strategy” demonstrate the strength of its business, it added. On Thursday, the owner of the FTSE 100 index unveiled plans to buy more of its own stock to reward shareholders over the next 12 months, boosted its dividend and set new guidance for the next two years. The increased buyback falls short of the £5 billion program that Bloomberg News reported Elliott was pushing for earlier this month. “Elliott looks forward to maintaining a constructive dialogue with LSEG as the company works to realize the full potential of its market-leading assets, close the valuation gap to industry peers and generate long-term value,” the investor said in the statement. Shares of LSEG have been buffeted in the recent stock selloff of software businesses seen at risk of disruption from artificial intelligence. Elliott seized on the opportunity and is now pushing for LSEG to show investors how it could benefit from AI. It wants the company to show how its sticky data business would actually see more demand from AI applications while its markets unit is largely immune, people familiar with its thinking told Bloomberg News earlier this month. “We try to listen to all of our shareholders, we can’t always make all of them happy,” LSEG Chief Executive Officer David Schwimmer told Bloomberg Radio in an interview on Thursday.

Read the article

2/27/2026

Lululemon Founder Wilson Ramps Up Pressure on Board Amid Proxy Fight

Reuters (02/27/26)

Lululemon Athletica (LULU.O) founder Chip Wilson stepped up his campaign for board and governance changes at the struggling athletic apparel maker on Friday, including replacing more than three directors. The move heightened tensions between the Canadian yoga wear maker and its founder, who has increasingly criticized the board's strategic direction, its handling of CEO succession and what he describes as a lack of creative and marketing expertise at the top. Wilson had launched a proxy fight at the end of last year by nominating three independent directors — Marc Maurer, Laura Gentile and Eric Hirshberg — to the company's board, and called for annual board elections. "While we have proposed changing three directors, our strong feeling is that more than three directors should be replaced," Wilson said in a letter to shareholders. Following director nominations in December, Wilson said the board engaged with them only earlier this week, and that its response was "weak and insufficient." "I have pursued private, constructive dialogues with the Lululemon board of directors for the past few months. My attempts toward a sensible solution have not been reciprocated," he said on Friday. Wilson, one of the biggest independent shareholders of Lululemon with a 4.27% stake, also said the board rejected his proposal to create a committee focused on brand, product and creative oversight. Lululemon did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Wilson's campaign comes as the company's shares have lost nearly half of their value over the past 12 months, with the brand struggling to retain younger and affluent shoppers amid intense competition from fast-growing rivals such as Alo Yoga and Vuori. Lululemon is also operating without a permanent CEO after Calvin McDonald's departure in December, and is facing pressure from Elliott Investment Management, which has built a stake of more than $1 billion in the retailer.

Read the article

2/27/2026

Blackstone Reportedly in Talks on Competing Bid for MarineMax

Tampa Bay Business Journal (02/27/26) Georgacopoulos, Christina

Several prominent investment firms have emerged as interested bidders in a takeover of MarineMax (NYSE: HZO) following a $1.1 billion offer made by an investor in January. Private equity giants Blackstone Inc. (NYSE: BX), Centerbridge Partners, and TPG Inc. (NASDAQ: TPG) are reportedly in talks with the Oldsmar boat and yacht retailer to make competing proposals, according to Reuters. Island Capital Group, an investment firm linked to the founder of a global marina operator MarineMax purchased in 2022, and recreational vehicle retailer Blue Compass have also reportedly indicated interest in a buyout. MarineMax’s board of directors has distributed confidentiality agreements to the firms and allowed access to certain documents and information for due diligence on a potential bid, according to Reuters. Wells Fargo investment bankers have represented MarineMax in due diligence for the $1.1 billion unsolicited offer made by Los Angeles hedge fund manager Donerail Group, according to the firm. However, Donerail claims the board of directors has refused to meaningfully engage in deal talks and seriously entertain a transaction. The firm has publicly amped up pressure on the company ahead of its annual shareholder meeting next month and pressed for the removal of MarineMax CEO Brett McGill from the board of directors. Another MarineMax shareholder, Levin Capital Strategies, voiced support for Donerail’s proposal last week and urged the board to run a formal process to bring other interested buyers to the table for a potentially higher and better bid. In a statement on Tuesday, MarineMax’s board disputed the claims that it has not taken action on Donerail’s bid and said three calls have been held with the firm to move forward with customary due diligence. MarineMax previously received a buyout offer from Georgia-based rival OneWater Marine (NASDAQ: ONEW) in late 2024, but negotiations fell apart after months of private discussion for unknown reasons. MarineMax is one of the largest public companies in Tampa Bay, with $2.3 billion in revenue last year, and 70 dealership locations and 65 marine and storage facilities globally.

Read the article

2/26/2026

Toyota Plans Around $19 Billion Share Sale by Financial Institutions, Sources Say

Reuters (02/26/26) Uranaka, Miho; Shiraki, Maki

Toyota (7203.T) plans a large-scale unwinding of strategic shareholdings that would involve banks and insurance firms selling around $19 billion of its shares, two sources said, in what would mark a watershed moment in Japan's corporate governance reform. The sale will likely total around 3 trillion yen ($19 billion) but could be larger depending on the willingness of shareholders to sell, the sources said. Toyota aims for the sale to happen as early as this year, although the timing and scale could change depending on shareholders - or the plan could be abandoned, one of the sources said. Toyota aims to acquire shares through buybacks, the sources said. A secondary sale to other investors has also emerged as an option, one of the sources said. The move by the world's largest automaker would be evidence of the scale of Japan's on-going corporate governance reform. Regulators and the Tokyo Stock Exchange have been encouraging Japanese companies to unwind their cross-shareholdings. The practice, which involves firms holding shares in each other to cement business ties, has long been criticized by governance experts and overseas investors as insulating management from shareholders. Although widespread in Japan for decades, it has been less common in the West. While Toyota has a policy to cut its cross-shareholdings, it has also come under fire over governance and has faced calls from investors to improve capital efficiency. Toyota wants to demonstrate its seriousness about governance reform by unwinding the strategic shares, one of the sources said. The automaker is in the midst of a tender offer for forklift maker Toyota Industries (6201.T). Investor Elliott opposes the deal, arguing it is underpriced and lacks transparency. Toyota has extended the tender offer to March 2 due to insufficient shareholder support. Toyota shareholders include banks such as Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (8316.T) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (8306.T) and insurers such as MS&AD Insurance Group (8725.T). Japanese banks and insurers have in recent years outlined policies to reduce their cross-shareholdings.

Read the article

2/26/2026

LSEG Plans $4.1 Billion Buyback Amid Investor Pressure

Reuters (02/26/26) Shabong, Yadarisa; Conchie, Charlie

London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG.L) said on Thursday it would buy back a further 3 billion pounds ($4.1 billion) of shares over the next 12 months, as the company faces engagement from Elliott Management and battles concerns AI will squeeze its business model. LSEG said its total income grew 7.1% in 2025 on an organic basis, excluding recoveries, in line with the rise expected by analysts in a company-compiled poll. Shares in LSEG rose as much as 4.7% in early London trading. The company expects 2026 total income to grow between 6.5% and 7.5% on an organic constant currency basis, excluding recoveries. Analysts had expected growth of about 6.7% on average, according to a company-compiled poll. LSEG shares had lost around 30% of their value in the past year as of Wednesday as the data and exchanges group finds itself caught up in a swirl of concerns its business along with rivals will be hit hard by the rise of AI. Elliott Management has emerged as a shareholder in recent weeks, upping the pressure on CEO David Schwimmer to improve the group's margins, which lag rivals, and more forcefully communicate its resilience against the threat of AI. Elliott has pressed LSEG for a $5 billion share buyback and a portfolio review, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters previously. LSEG reported 5.9% growth in annual subscription value (ASV), a closely-watched growth metric. The figure marks a slowdown from 6.3% in its results last year. Like many exchange groups, LSEG has pivoted towards provision of data business in the past few years, betting on demand for proprietary financial data as its traditional stock exchange business has suffered from a slowdown in new listings and the departure of some companies to exchanges overseas. Schwimmer has dismissed fears that its data business will be usurped by AI models and argued that LSEG data is proprietary. LSEG has also struck a number of deals with firms including OpenAI and Anthropic that will allow their users to access and interrogate LSEG data. Schwimmer said in a statement on Thursday LSEG was "very well positioned for continued growth."

Read the article

2/26/2026

Smucker Jumps After Pact With Elliott on Directors

Bloomberg (02/26/26) Peterson, Kristina; Carnevali, David

JM Smucker Co. (NYSE: SJM) said two new directors will be joining its board as part of an agreement reached with Elliott Investment Management. Woo-Sung Chung and David Singer will join the board in April. The deal also includes sharing information with the investor with the goal of boosting shareholder value. The company’s shares jumped as much as 12% at the open of New York trading, the most intraday since 2020. The stock had slipped about 5% in the last 12 months, trimming its market value to roughly $11 billion. Elliott’s involvement in Smucker came as a surprise Thursday morning. The investor said it was one of Smucker’s largest investors, but didn’t disclose the size of its stake in the maker of peanut butter, jams and coffee. Smucker Chief Executive Mark Smucker said in prepared remarks Thursday as part of releasing earnings that the appointment of two new board members followed “constructive engagement” with Elliott and that he was confident the company has “the right strategy and leaders in place to create value for our shareholders.” The company's engagement with Elliott was “recent,” Smucker said on a call with analysts. Both organizations are focused on operating improvements, “disciplined capital allocation” and bolstering the food company's governance, Smucker said. Smucker has “a strong portfolio of market-leading brands in categories that benefit from durable consumer demand,” Marc Steinberg, a partner at Elliott, said on Thursday. The additions to the board and the company’s strategic steps will help ensure it “reaches its full potential,” he said. Chung is the chief financial officer of NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG), which owns and operates power-generating facilities. Singer is the former CEO of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., which makes snack foods. Elliott, founded by billionaire Paul Singer, is one of Wall Street’s most prominent activist funds. Now headquartered in Florida, it managed about $80 billion in assets at the end of 2025, according to its website. The firm has launched an array of campaigns against consumer companies, this month taking on Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH) over what Elliott called overspending on events, including a Katy Perry concert. In December, Bloomberg News reported that Elliott had built a stake of more than $1 billion in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU). as the struggling retailer faces a strategic overhaul. Also in December, PepsiCo Inc. (NASDAQ: PEP) reached an agreement with Elliott to reduce its U.S. product lineup by 20% and lower prices, while the company also pares its workforce. Earlier this month, Smucker announced some leadership changes, including the departure of its Chief Operating Officer, John Brase. The company also said last week that it wasn't pursuing acquisitions as part of its strategy during a presentation at the Consumer Analyst Group of New York conference in Orlando, Florida. Smucker, which makes the Folgers and Cafe Bustelo brands, has been weighed down by the cost of coffee and its November 2023 acquisition of Hostess. “The path to stabilization is taking longer than we expected but our focus remains on positioning the Hostess brand for eventual growth,” Smucker said last week at the conference. Smucker has seen more success with its Uncrustables line of frozen sandwiches, which it is launching in a new refrigerator-stable format. To cut costs, the company said last week it was reducing promotions on its sweet baked snacks from January through the end of its fiscal year, which runs through April. Smucker said the company is also trimming the number of individual products it has by 25%. On Thursday, the company also reported third-quarter adjusted earnings per share and revenue that topped analysts' expectations, boosted by higher coffee prices.

Read the article

2/26/2026

Janus Bidding War Begins as Victory Capital Tops Trian Offer

Bloomberg (02/26/26) Gyftopoulou, Loukia; Dickson, Steve

A bidding war for Janus Henderson Group Plc (NYSE: JHG) broke out Thursday as Victory Capital Holdings Inc. offered to buy the money manager for $57.04 a share, in a move that topped a previous offer from Nelson Peltz’s Trian Fund Management. Victory’s cash-and-stock proposal calls for Janus Henderson shareholders to own about 38% of the combined company, which would have an enterprise value of about $16 billion, according to a statement. The offer comes about two months after Peltz’s Trian and General Catalyst agreed to buy London-based Janus Henderson in a deal that valued the asset manager at about $7.4 billion and offered stockholders $49 a share in cash. “Our proposal is fully financed and provides Janus Henderson shareholders with meaningful long?term upside through ownership of a stronger, more competitive organization,” David Brown, chairman and chief executive officer of Victory Capital, said in the statement. The bidding war comes amid a broader wave of consolidation across the asset management industry, where firms have spent years grappling with clients dumping their mutual funds for cheaper, passive products. Janus Henderson, created through a 2017 transatlantic merger to combat these challenges, suffered years of outflows until recently. Victory said it would issue $4.1 billion of new debt as part of the effort to take over Janus Henderson, which manages almost 60% more assets than Victory. The company said it had financing commitments from two major investment banks. Shares of Janus Henderson rose as much as 7.2% as of 10 a.m. in New York. Victory Capital shares fell as much as 7.1%. Victory Capital said Thursday it first submitted a preliminary bid of as much as $52 a share for Janus on Nov. 24 — nearly a month before Janus announced it had agreed to the Trian deal. At the time, John Cassaday, chairman of Janus Henderson’s board, said the company had done a “careful review of the proposed transaction and its alternatives” and determined Peltz’s deal was in the best interest of the company’s shareholders. But Brown said Thursday his firm was repeatedly denied any chance at meaningful engagement with his counterparts at Janus. “Notwithstanding the fact that we were the only credible, unaffiliated party that expressed interest and indicated a valuation range in excess of Trian’s proposal, we were denied the opportunity to engage in any meaningful dialogue and not provided access to any information to refine our proposal,” Brown said, calling Peltz an insider given his role on Janus’ board since 2022. The new wave of acquisitions in the industry has included some unlikely names. Earlier this month, Schroders Plc (OTCMKTS: SHNWF) agreed to a takeover by Nuveen, shocking many in the City of London. For its part, San Antonio, Texas-based Victory Capital added more than $100 billion in assets under management in a deal last year to add Pioneer, the U.S. business of France’s Amundi SA (EPA: AMUN). And earlier this month, Brown predicted more to come. “We continue to be extremely busy from an acquisition standpoint,” the CEO said on the firm’s earnings conference call. “In fact, I would say the busiest we ever have been.”

Read the article

2/26/2026

Siemens Energy Should Not 'Squander' Wind Division, Top-20 Investor Says

Reuters (02/26/26) Steitz, Christoph

Siemens Energy (ENR1n.DE) should not sell its wind division below value, a top-20 shareholder said on Thursday at the group's annual general meeting, where the future of the struggling business will be a key topic after calls for a spin-off. The future of Siemens Gamesa, which has weighed on Siemens Energy's profits for years, has come into sharper focus after U.S. shareholder Ananym in December called for a review and spin-off, arguing it would boost shareholder value. Siemens Energy has been open in principle to the idea but wants to first stabilize the business, which made a 1.36 billion euro ($1.61 billion) operating loss last year and is expected to break even in 2026. Investors in Germany have backed the strategy of fixing the business before considering strategic steps. "To be clear: divesting Gamesa at this point in time would be equal to selling it below its value," Deka Investment's Ingo Speich said. "Do not squander away Gamesa." Ananym said in a statement it had recently held "very constructive direct discussions" with Siemens Energy's leadership, adding there largely was agreement in the thinking about Gamesa. "No one is calling for a fire sale, or a sale at all, we're talking about a spin-off. And we understand nothing can be done today," it said, adding the goal was to start thinking about the future and that management had done a "heroic job" on getting Gamesa closer to being able to stand on its own feet. Ananym said that even if Siemens Gamesa could be stabilized it was unlikely to reach the margin targets set by the parent and would continue to be a drag on its parent. Siemens Energy has said it wants all of its businesses to generate double-digit margins, far higher than the 3-5% profit margin targeted for Siemens Gamesa by 2028. Siemens Energy CEO Christian Bruch said there would have to be a clear path towards double-digit returns for the division by 2028.

Read the article

2/26/2026

Caesars Entertainment Weighs Takeover Interest

Financial Times (02/26/26) Barnes, Oliver; Indap, Sujeet

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ: CZR) is weighing takeover offers including a bid from Texas gaming and hospitality billionaire Tilman Fertitta, setting the stage for a potential buyout of one of the jewels of the Las Vegas Strip. Caesars is exploring a sale after receiving takeover interest from several potential bidders including Fertitta Entertainment, the group behind the Golden Nugget casino chain, said people familiar with the matter. It is also considering a possible management-led buyout. Talks are ongoing but a transaction is far from a foregone conclusion, the people cautioned. It is possible the talks could collapse, they added. Shares in Caesars have sunk to a five-year low. They jumped 19% to $24.74 after the FT reported on the takeover interest, giving the company an equity value of more than $5 billion. Caesars was absorbed into smaller rival El Dorado Resorts following a takeover in 2020. It has a debt load of more than $20 billion including lease payments giving it an enterprise value above $30 billion. If a deal materializes, it would mark one of the biggest gaming takeovers in years. Caesars’ annual free cash flow of more than $3 billion makes the company an attractive asset to any potential buyer, the people said. Caesars’ recent struggles have for the second time drawn the attention of Wall Street’s most famed investor Carl Icahn. Its board was expanded last year to add two representatives from Icahn Enterprises as part of a brokered peace with him. Icahn pushed for a change of strategy at Caesars in 2019, a move that helped precipitate the El Dorado transaction. After the 2020 acquisition, El Dorado retained the Caesars’ moniker but the company is officially headquartered in Reno, Nevada, where El Dorado is based. Tom Reeg, Caesars’ chief executive, is the longtime head of El Dorado who was a one-time junk bond trader. Caesars controls more than 50 casinos across North America, including the Caesars Palace, Harrah’s and El Dorado brands. Caesars also runs a betting app which has struggled to compete with FanDuel and DraftKings (NASDAQ: DKNG). Despite being one of the most famed brands on the Las Vegas strip, Caesars has had a rocky history. Private equity groups Apollo and TPG bought the company, then known as Harrah’s, in 2008 for $30 billion just as the global financial crisis was beginning. Caesars filed for bankruptcy in 2015. In the aftermath of the restructuring, its huge property portfolio was spun off into a separate listed property trust known as Vici, to which Caesars today pays billions in annual lease expenses. Vici is worth more than twice Caesars’ aggregate valuation. A surge in interest in gaming stocks during the Covid-19 pandemic, as gamblers were spending heavily online while stuck at home, boosted Caesars’ market value to roughly $24 billion. But it has since fallen more than 80% from its highs. In 2025, visitor volume to Las Vegas fell nearly a tenth, according to statistics gathered by the city’s tourism authority. President Donald Trump in December 2024 appointed Fertitta as U.S. ambassador to Italy. In addition to seven casino resorts in the Golden Nugget stable, he owns stakes in Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ: WYNN) and DraftKings, as well as a restaurant empire that includes such chains as Morton’s, Mastro’s, Bubba Gump Shrimp and Rainforest Cafe. Fertitta also owns the Houston Rockets professional basketball team. In order to cover the huge debt and lease liabilities facing Caesars, any acquisition would likely involve a large financing package from Wall Street banks, which would make the likelihood of a deal materializing much trickier, the people said.

Read the article

2/26/2026

Ancora Holdings Pushes Warner to Walk Away From Netflix Deal

Wall Street Journal (02/26/26) Thomas, Lauren

Ancora Holdings has built a roughly $200 million stake in Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) and is planning to oppose Warner’s deal to sell its movie and television studios and HBO Max streaming service to Netflix (NFLX), according to people familiar with the matter. Ancora, which could announce its position as soon as Wednesday, believes that Warner failed to adequately engage with David Ellison’s Paramount Skydance (PSKY) after it made a rival all-cash offer for the entire business, including its cable-network group, at $30 a share, the people said. The arrival of an activist, even with a small stake in the company, will add yet another dose of uncertainty and drama to an already drawn-out fight for the Hollywood studio. Netflix has signed a $72 billion deal, but Paramount, which is bidding nearly $78 billion for the whole company, has gone straight to shareholders and threatened to wage a board fight at the same time. Ancora, a roughly $11 billion fund that has a history of lobbying in the middle of deals, emailed Warner Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav on Tuesday to say that it is considering launching its own proxy fight if Warner’s board doesn’t negotiate the best deal for shareholders with Paramount, the people added. Warner has a market value of roughly $69 billion as of Tuesday, making Ancora’s stake in the company less than 1%. But Ancora plans to continue buying Warner shares, the people familiar with the matter added, and, even with a small stake, it adds a voice that could help rally other investors around opposing the Netflix transaction. Many shareholders remain on the fence over which deal is better and are anticipating the offers could be revised further. A shareholder vote is expected next month. Netflix agreed in December to pay $27.75 a share in cash for Warner’s studios and HBO Max streaming service. That would leave investors also holding shares in Discovery Global, a new company housing Warner’s cable networks, which it plans to spin off later this year. Paramount’s hostile bid for all of Warner Discovery includes its cable-networks unit that includes CNN, TNT, Food Network, and other channels. Warner has consistently rebuffed Paramount’s offer, arguing Netflix’s deal has greater value, more secure financing and a cleaner path to regulatory approval. Paramount on Tuesday enhanced its hostile offer, including agreeing to pay the $2.8 billion termination fee Warner would owe Netflix should that deal collapse. Paramount also said it was adding a “ticking fee” of 25 cents a share, which it would pay to Warner shareholders for each quarter its deal hasn’t closed, starting in January 2027. If Ancora were to proceed with nominating director candidates, it would focus on replacing individuals with ties to Zaslav, the people familiar with the matter said. Ancora has privately questioned the Warner CEO about whether he favored the Netflix deal to obtain an executive role with the streaming company after the transaction closes, they added. Ancora has antitrust concerns about the Netflix deal it calls “uncertain and inferior.” And it questions the Discovery Global spinoff, which would put $17 billion in Warner debt on the company’s cable-TV networks, which have a declining number of viewers, according to a presentation from the investor seen by The Wall Street Journal. In that presentation, Ancora defends Paramount’s viability as a buyer, pointing to the record of Ellison and his father, the billionaire Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) co-founder Larry Ellison. It also said it expects Paramount to receive swift antitrust approval. Many investors and analysts still largely expect Paramount could increase its $30-a-share offer. Analysts at Raymond James said in a recent note to clients that “many WBD shareholders still expect PSKY has not made its best and final offer, and will raise its bid by ~$2-3 per share.” Cleveland-based Ancora has a history of pushing for deals, both publicly and behind the scenes. In 2024, it built a huge stake in Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC) and later won seats on the railroad operator’s board before the company agreed to be acquired by Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) for almost $72 billion. It also recently privately pushed bubble-wrap maker Sealed Air to sell itself, before the business agreed to be bought by CD&R.

Read the article

2/25/2026

MarineMax Attracts More Buyout Interest After Donerail Offer, Sources Say

Reuters (02/25/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Private equity firms including Blackstone (BX.N) and Centerbridge Partners, strategic investors and wealthy individuals have expressed interest in buying recreational yacht retailer MarineMax (HZO.N) or pieces of it, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The company, which also operates marinas and services superyachts, has sent out confidentiality agreements allowing the parties to review documents and receive other information to shape a potential bid, said the sources who are not permitted to discuss the private talks. Recreational vehicle retail company Blue Compass, investor Island Capital Group and private equity group TPG (TPG.O) have also expressed interest, the sources said. Representatives for the firms declined to comment or did not return calls and emails seeking comment. MarineMax did not immediately respond to a request for comment. There is no guarantee any deal will be reached, however, the sources cautioned. Demand for the marinas business is currently a hot investment area as interest rates have dropped and consumer demand for boats appears to be rising, industry analysts said. Earlier this week, MarineMax said that it remains committed to carefully evaluating any credible proposal that could improve shareholder value. The outreach to MarineMax and its bankers comes less than a month after Reuters reported that Donerail Group, which owns a 5% stake in the company, offered to buy all of it for just over $1 billion. MarineMax hired Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) bankers earlier this year after receiving the Donerail offer. Wells Fargo declined to comment. Headquartered in Clearwater, Florida, MarineMax caters to a wealthy clientele through its 65 marinas and storage locations and 70 dealerships, with megayachts listed for sale on its website in the millions of dollars. Pressure has been building on the company to take action ever since Donerail last year called on the board to make sweeping changes that ranged from selling the company to replacing its chief executive officer. While MarineMax has made some changes and replaced several directors, including removing the chief financial officer from the board last year, the moves failed to satisfy Donerail. Last week, Levin Capital Strategies, one of MarineMax's 10 largest shareholders, publicly called on the company to immediately begin a strategic review. The firm also urged the board to engage with Donerail after receiving its offer. Next week, shareholders will vote on who sits on the company's board at its annual meeting, deciding the fate of CEO Brett McGill, son of MarineMax founder Bill McGill, who is up for election. Since Brett McGill became CEO in 2018, the company's earnings per share have dropped 64% and in the last five years MarineMax's share price has dropped 43% while the broader Standard & Poor's 500 index returned 76%. This year, shares of the company, which is valued at $628 million, have climbed 18%. Donerail is trying to shake up the board and is urging investors to withhold votes from McGill. Pension fund the California Teachers' Retirement System, called CalSTRS, said it has voted against all three directors standing for election.

Read the article

2/25/2026

Elliott Assures UK Over Future of LSE

Financial Times (02/25/26) Armstrong, Ashley; Barnes, Oliver; Asgari, Nikou

Elliott Management has privately assured the UK government about its intentions for the future of the London Stock Exchange after building a significant stake in its parent group. There have been talks between the investor and government officials to assuage fears that Elliott might push for a break-up of the group or a spin-off of the LSE, according to people familiar with the discussions. They added that the hedge fund also dispelled concerns that it might push to shift the group to a New York listing, where rival venues trade at a higher valuation multiple. Elliott had taken a position in London Stock Exchange Group (LON: LSEG) and is engaging with the company to improve its performance, the FT reported earlier this month. LSEG shares have fallen by 31% over the past year. The hedge fund run by billionaire Paul Singer reached out proactively to the UK government, said one person familiar with the discussions. The investor also holds stakes in other London-listed companies, including BP (LON: BP) and Anglo American (LON: AAL). The Treasury is sensitive to the health and fortunes of the LSE and the news of Elliott’s investment immediately triggered discussions within the department, a second person close to the situation added. News of talks between the government and Elliott comes as LSEG prepares to unveil its annual results on Thursday, during which chief executive David Schwimmer is expected to publicly address the group’s engagement with Elliott for the first time. Investors will be scrutinizing whether LSEG will reveal further share buybacks, a move that Elliott is pushing for, according to people familiar with discussions between the company and the investor. Schwimmer is likely also to address concerns over the future of the business in the face of AI. The exchange group’s shares have dropped over the past year as shareholders worry about how disruptive AI will be to the business. The Treasury has made reviving the UK’s capital markets a priority and has worked with regulators and the LSE on slashing red tape to encourage more companies to list and raise money in London. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said last month that she believed the City was entering a “new golden age” amid hopes there could soon be a revival in London listings after they hit their lowest level in 30 years. Another person familiar with the discussions said it was “unsurprising” that the government had a dialogue with Elliott, given LSEG’s “national importance” to capital markets and the flow of money in the UK. Through its $27 billion acquisition of data group Refinitiv in 2019, LSEG has grown into a financial data giant, making most of its money by selling markets data to banks, brokers, and investors. The company made less than 5% of its revenues from equities in the third quarter of 2025. Previous takeover attempts of LSEG by Deutsche Börse (OTCMKTS: DBOEY) in 2016 and Hong Kong’s HKEX (0388.HK) in 2019 provoked concern among British politicians because of the stock exchange’s role at the heart of the UK financial markets. The UK’s national security regime was “sufficiently open to interpretation” that the government could review an overseas investor’s stake in the LSE, one City lawyer said. The National Security and Investment Act includes aspects of financial and data infrastructure, which it defines as “physical or virtualized infrastructure used for storing, processing or transmitting data in digital form or infrastructure” — which could capture LSEG. The City lawyer, who is not advising either Elliott or the company, said: “Elliott’s proactive approach could be a way of assuring the government there is no threat or need to trigger review.”

Read the article

2/25/2026

South Korea Passes Corporate Reform Bill

Financial Times (02/25/26) Jung-a, Song

South Korea has passed a crucial corporate reform bill aimed at improving shareholder returns, giving a further boost to the world’s best-performing stock market this year. The National Assembly on Wednesday passed a revision of the Commercial Act requiring Korean companies to cancel newly acquired treasury shares within a year. The law ends a practice that investors say has helped owner families maintain control over their conglomerates at the expense of minority shareholders. It is the latest step in the ruling party’s attempts to tackle poor corporate governance and the so-called Korea discount that has typically suppressed valuations for the country’s shares relative to other markets. The parliament in July passed a law making it a legal duty for directors to consider the interests of all shareholders rather than just the company, which, according to critics, often means the interests of ruling family members of chaebol, the family-run conglomerates that dominate the economy. It has also mandated cumulative voting, which allows minority shareholders to concentrate their votes on specific board candidates, and separate elections of auditors. The reform measures have helped the Kospi become the world’s best-performing major stock index for the second year running. It has jumped more than 40% since the start of the year to a record high above 6,000 after its world-beating 76% rally last year. Investors have long called for the mandatory cancellation of treasury shares. While many chaebol do buy back shares, they will often hold them for intragroup mergers or as ammunition against hostile takeover bids. Since these treasury shares are not canceled, buybacks often do not result in price increases. “Buying back their own shares is one of the best ways to boost shareholder returns, but Korean companies have used it for different purposes like protecting their control,” said HK Kim, executive director at Tcha Partners, a Seoul-based asset manager. “This is a step in the right direction.” President Lee Jae Myung, from the Democratic Party of Korea, won elections last year promising the country’s army of retail investors, commonly known as “ants”, that he would improve corporate governance and boost the stock market. Lee has already achieved a target for the Kospi to hit 5,000 during his term. His party, which controls parliament, is expected to speed up reform measures ahead of provincial elections in June. Many companies have already announced plans to cancel treasury shares even before the parliamentary move. “People were thirsty for the advancement of the capital market. We have achieved [our goal] earlier than expected,” said ruling party lawmaker Min Byung-duk on Wednesday. “Still, the discount issue has not been fully resolved...it is not too late [to do more] to become a premium market.” The ruling party is also pushing a bill to strengthen the fiduciary duty of institutional investors, including the state-run National Pension Service to encourage active shareholder engagement. “The next step for [the ruling party] will be to revise a stewardship code for institutional investors,” said Changhwan Lee, chief executive of Seoul-based fund Align Partners. “Despite the recent progress, the country still has a long way to go in terms of improving corporate governance compared with the United States and Japan.”

Read the article

2/25/2026

Italian Gunmaker Beretta Launches Proxy Fight for U.S. Firearms Giant Sturm, Ruger & Co.

New York Post (02/25/26) Franey, James

Italian gun manufacturer Beretta is launching a proxy fight to take control of Sturm, Ruger and Co. (NYSE: RGR), America’s largest firearms maker, sources familiar with the matter say. Insiders said the 500-year-old European firm, which has built a 10% stake in Hartford, Conn.-based Ruger, wants to nominate four executives to join the nine-member board — a move designed to gain more control over the main U.S. rival to Smith & Wesson (NASDAQ: SWBI). Sources said the nominees included William Franklin Detwiler, managing partner of Fernbrook Capital Management; Mark DeYoung, the founding CEO of Vista Outdoor; Frederick Disanto, CEO of Ancora Holdings; and Michael Christodolou, the founder of Inwood Capital Management. Any vote would likely take place at Ruger’s annual general meeting scheduled for May 29. The clash has erupted amid a sales slump and plunging profits at Ruger, with the price of its shares cratering by over 40% in the past five years. As of Wednesday’s close, Ruger’s market cap hovered at $581 million. When Beretta first revealed an initial 9% stake in an October filing, it said that it wanted to explore “potential areas of operational and strategic collaborations” with Ruger. The U.S. firm then adopted a one-year shareholder rights plan amid concerns about a growing ownership stake accumulated by the Italian giant. Beretta raked in $1.7 billion in revenue in 2024 and has been snapping up rivals like Switzerland’s RUAG Ammotec in 2022. Pietro Gussalli Beretta, a 15th-generation heir to founder Bartolomeo Beretta, steers the company.

Read the article

2/25/2026

Activist Investor Prompts Sale of Charles River CDMO Business, U.S. and European Sites

Boston Business Journal (02/25/26) Baratham-Green, Hannah

Driven by activist investor engagement, Charles River has secured deals to sell several businesses that it considers “underperforming or non-core.” Charles River Laboratories International Inc. (NYSE: CRL) is selling some European assets within its discovery services business to IQVIA Holdings Inc. (NYSE: IQV) The deal will give Charles River roughly $145 million in cash, plus potential payments of up to $10 million. Discovery and safety assessment is one of three business segments at Charles River; the other two are research models and services and manufacturing. The business sale includes letting go of five European sites in Cambridge, U.K.; Freiburg, Germany; Kuopio, Finland; Portishead, UK; and Leiden, Netherlands. The work done at these sites included in vitro drug discovery services and pharmacology services. The Wilmington-based contract research organization said it will keep other drug discovery capabilities that total about 40% of its discovery services revenue in 2025. Charles River is also divesting its contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) and cell solutions businesses to GI Partners. The CDMO business helps produce advanced therapies for gene-modified cell therapies and gene therapies including viral vectors and plasmid DNA. The cell solutions work provides human-derived cellular materials used in the development and production of cell therapies. As part of this deal, Charles River is selling its CDMO sites in Tennessee, Maryland, and the United Kingdom, as well as its cell solutions site in California. The company didn’t provide price specifics for this deal, noting that the sale was “primarily for future, contingent performance-based payments.” All of these transactions are supposed to close during the second quarter of 2026. These are the first details that Charles River has shared about its divestitures after announcing in November 2025 that it would sell off underperforming businesses and focus on areas with more growth potential. The sales came after Elliott Investment Management got involved in the company last year and pushed for a strategic review of the business and shake up of its board. Charles River remains one of the largest life sciences companies in the state, with about 2,200 employees based in Massachusetts out of its global workforce of nearly 20,000.

Read the article

2/24/2026

Palliser Capital Seeks Court Order to Force Shareholder Proposals onto LG Chem AGM Agenda

alphabiz.co.kr (02/24/26) Jisun, Kim

Palliser Capital, which has been pursuing engagement with LG Chem (KRX: 051910), has filed for a court injunction seeking to require the company to place shareholder proposals on the agenda of its upcoming annual general meeting (AGM). LG Chem disclosed on Sunday that Palliser Capital Master Fund filed an application with the Seoul Southern District Court for a provisional injunction to mandate the inclusion of shareholder-proposed items on the AGM agenda. A hearing has been scheduled for March 4. In its filing, Palliser requested that the court order LG Chem to: (i) include the shareholder-proposed items on the agenda of the AGM; (ii) notify shareholders of each proposed item at least two weeks prior to the AGM date through the official notice of convocation or an equivalent public announcement; and (iii) bear the legal costs associated with the application. The injunction request is widely seen as a preemptive legal move, as Palliser’s shareholder proposals—submitted to LG Chem on February 10—may not be adopted as formal AGM agenda items. Palliser is reported to have held more than a 1% stake in LG Chem on a long-term basis. Palliser has called for amendments to LG Chem’s articles of incorporation to allow for non-binding shareholder proposals, as well as the introduction of a lead independent director system. The fund has also urged the company to enhance management transparency and capital allocation by proposing measures including: regular disclosure of the net asset value (NAV) discount; the adoption of key performance indicators (KPIs) reflecting capital efficiency; and a review of equity-linked compensation schemes. In particular, Palliser has recommended that LG Chem reduce its ownership stake in LG Energy Solution to below 70% and use the proceeds to fund share buybacks as part of its value enhancement strategy. LG Chem currently holds approximately a 79% stake in LG Energy Solution (KRX: 373220). Palliser argues that LG Chem continues to trade at a significant discount to its net asset value, asserting that weaknesses in corporate governance and capital allocation policies are the primary drivers of the company’s undervaluation.

Read the article

2/24/2026

Elliott Woos Shareholders Backing Toyota Industries Buyout, Sources Say

Reuters (02/24/26) Nussey, Sam; Bridge, Anton

Elliott Management has offered to pay around market price to buy Toyota Industries (6201.T) shares from holders who have agreed to a tender offer that the activist said undervalues the forklift truck maker, two people familiar with the matter said. Elliott has approached shareholders including suppliers and financial institutions that have backed the Toyota group's take-private bid, the people said, declining to be identified as the information is not public. Elliott's success would translate into reduced support for the buyout, hampering Toyota's attempt to reshape the group. The deal is widely seen as a test case for governance in Japan where regulators are encouraging companies to unwind cross-shareholding arrangements and improve capital efficiency. Toyota Industries' share price closed at 20,200 yen ($130) on Friday. Markets were closed on Monday for a public holiday. That was roughly 7% above the 18,800 yen proposed by Toyota, which announced the plan in June and this month extended the offer due to insufficient shareholder support. Elliott has said Toyota Industries shares are worth more than 26,000 yen each. It owns around 7% of the company, showed a filing from early February, and must report to the stock exchange whenever its holding changes by 1% or more. Toyota sweetened its offer in January and has said its raised price reflects the intrinsic value of the company and that it has no intention of hiking again. As of mid-February, Toyota needed 9% of shareholders to agree to sell the group their holdings for it to reach the two-thirds majority needed to take control of the company. Shareholders that have agreed to sell include Ibiden (4062.T), Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance and Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance, filings from January showed. Ibiden has outlined plans to reduce cross-shareholding arrangements and in January said selling its Toyota Industries stock will improve its own corporate value and benefit shareholders.

Read the article

2/24/2026

Japan's Top Business Lobby Put Off Private Meeting with Elliott

Reuters (02/24/26) Yamazaki, Makiko

Keidanren, Japan's biggest business lobby, has put off a private meeting scheduled for next month with Elliott Investment Management, an official from the lobby group said on Tuesday. The planned meeting on March 5 was meant to be an opportunity for an Elliott portfolio manager overseeing Japanese equity investments to outline the fund's investment strategy and approach to engagement with companies, followed by "a frank exchange of views," Reuters reported last month. An official at Keidanren said the meeting had been put off due to "various reasons," but declined to comment further. Elliott did not respond to a request for comment. Elliott has a growing presence in Japan, taking stakes in and pushing for changes at major companies, and is opposing Toyota's (NYSE: TM) attempt to buy out forklift maker Toyota Industries (6201.T). The Toyota deal is seen as a test case for corporate governance in Japan where regulators are encouraging companies to unwind cross-shareholding arrangements and improve capital efficiency. Elliott has criticized the deal as being underpriced and lacking transparency. Toyota, which is a member of the lobby group, has extended its tender offer to March 2 due to insufficient shareholder support. Elliott has offered to buy shares from investors who have agreed to the offer, which if successful would translate into reduced support for the buyout, Reuters reported on Tuesday. The investor has also taken stakes in other companies such as Tokyo Gas (9531.T), Kansai Electric Power (9503.T), and Sumitomo Realty & Development (8830.T), all members of the lobby group.

Read the article

2/24/2026

Activist Irenic Builds Stake in Ralliant, Pushes for Cost Cuts

Reuters (02/24/26) Herbst-Bayliss, Svea

Irenic Capital Management has built a sizable stake in Ralliant (RAL.N) and wants the precision technology maker to cut costs, buy back more stock at a faster pace and focus more on its defense and electronics business, two sources familiar with the matter said. Irenic owns roughly 2% of Ralliant and has met with management numerous times to discuss possible changes to help the $4.7 billion company perform better, according to the sources who are not permitted to discuss the private talks. A company representative was not immediately available for comment. Specifically, the New York-based hedge fund wants the Raleigh, North Carolina-headquartered company to commit to buying back more stock. The company had said again in early February, when it announced earnings, that the board's repurchase authorization of $200 million made last year "remains fully available." Irenic however feels the company could announce a larger buyback and an accelerated share repurchase program, a fast, contract-based method for a company to buy back a large volume of its own shares immediately, the sources said. Irenic is also pushing Ralliant to cut day-to-day operating expenses after the company surprised investors by twice increasing its forecast for costs, including merit increases and other employee expenses. And Irenic wants the company to concentrate more on its sensors and safety systems business, which contributes roughly 80% of the company's earnings, the sources said. Ralliant's test and measurement business makes up the rest. Industry analysts have noted that the volatility of the test and measurement business has hurt the company overall, helping push its stock price down 20.5% since Ralliant was spun out of industrial technology conglomerate Fortive (FTV.N) less than a year ago. In early February, Ralliant's stock price plunged roughly 30% as investors reacted negatively to indications that future costs would be higher than what shareholders had expected. Irenic, co-founded by Adam Katz and Andy Dodge, has told other investors and the company privately that its two businesses do not logically fit together, the sources said. Ralliant's test and measurement business might find a better home with competitors such as engineering services company Emerson Electric (EMR.N) which purchased National Instruments in 2023, industry analysts have said. At the same time, the sources noted that Irenic believes the sensors and safety systems business should be able to grow in the high single digits for many years, fueled by megatrends including the rebuilding and maintenance of the U.S. electrical grid and ramping up the country's missile defense system. Ralliant subsidiary Qualitrol makes sensor components to track the performance of utility electrical assets, including power plants, transformers and towers. Ralliant's Pacific Scientific EMC unit manufactures pyrotechnic components for missiles and space systems. Irenic has a history of investing in aerospace and defense companies and it has previously pushed some companies to separate into more focused businesses or to sell themselves. Barnes Group, where Irenic urged changes, sold itself to private equity firm Apollo in early 2025.

Read the article

2/23/2026

Jack in the Box Sued by Investor Over Proxy-Vote Disclosure

Bloomberg (02/23/26) Feeley, Jef

An investor in Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: JACK) accused the company of a “smear campaign” against him and asked a judge to order the iconic burger chain to correct disclosures about an upcoming proxy vote on whether to oust the chairman. Biglari Capital Corp., led by veteran food-industry investor Sardar Biglari, sued Jack in the Box Chairman David Goebel, along with other company directors Friday in Delaware Chancery Court. He demanded the chain retract what he called factually flawed statements about the investment firm. Biglari – the company’s largest shareholder with almost 10% of its shares — is urging shareholders to vote out Goebel, saying Jack in the Box has underperformed under his watch. The vote is set for Feb. 27. “Instead of allowing shareholders to evaluate Mr. Biglari’s proxy efforts independently, the board has opted to engage in a smear campaign against Mr. Biglari” as part of an improper effort to hold onto their seats, Biglari’s lawyers said in court filings. The filings point to assertions that Biglari “has a history of ‘value destruction,’ ‘wast[ing] resources,’ and ‘erratic behavior’ in connection with his prior investments,” and that the group “will destroy long-term value for shareholders because Mr. Biglari has engaged in self-interested behavior not designed to maximize shareholder value.” “Jack in the Box intends to vigorously defend itself to the extent the Biglari Group determines to continue to proceed with its lawsuit,” officials of the San Diego-based chain said Monday in an emailed release. In the past, Biglari has launched campaigns targeting other food companies, such as burger chain Steak ’N Shake and Western Sizzlin steakhouses. Biglari also waged an unsuccessful 14-year battle against the Cracker Barrel (NASDAQ: CBRL) chain over its management. His efforts to lobby Cracker Barrel shareholders to add him to its board didn’t prevail. Jack in the Box’s most recent quarterly report may provide fuel for Biglari’s claims the chain lags behind other fast-food rivals. The company reported its same-store sales declined 6.7% in its fiscal first quarter of 2026, compared with a year earlier. The chain, which opened in 1951, has more than 2,100 locations in 22 states, mostly in the western half of the United States. Industry leader McDonald’s Corp’s (NYSE: MCD) more than 41,000 U.S. locations. Besides trying to oust Goebel from the board, Biglari is urging fellow Jack in the Box investors to shoot down a so-called poison-pill takeover defense the company erected after he started acquiring stock. The defense limits investors to owning no more than 12.5% of its shares. In its Feb. 6 proxy about the upcoming vote, Biglari said Jack in the Box officials included “a litany of both objectively false statements of fact and unsupported, baseless and defamatory descriptions” of his firm. The investor originally sought to have Delaware Chancery Court Chief Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick put the vote on hold for corrections. McCormick ruled Monday she wouldn’t stop the vote for corrective measures, Jack in the Box officials said in the emailed release.

Read the article

2/22/2026

Investor Ed Garden Builds Stake in Fortune Brands, Seeking New CEO

Wall Street Journal (02/22/26) Thomas, Lauren

Investor Ed Garden has built a stake in building-products supplier Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE: FBIN), the maker of Moen faucets and Master Lock padlocks, and is seeking to replace the incoming chief executive along with other changes, according to people familiar with the matter. Garden Investments is now among the top shareholders in Fortune Brands and aims to become the company’s largest shareholder over time, the people said. The exact size of the firm’s stake couldn’t be learned. Garden has privately nominated a slate of director candidates ahead of Fortune Brands’ next annual shareholder meeting, a representative for Garden Investments confirmed. The company has a staggered board, meaning only a certain number of directors come up for election each year, in this case three. Fortune Brands is best known for its home- and building-products brands including Moen, House of Rohl kitchen and bath fixtures, SentrySafe waterproof safes and others. The company has a market value of around $6.5 billion, after its shares fell nearly 30% over the past five years. Its biggest rival Masco (NYSE: MAS), which makes Delta faucets, is up close to 40% over that time period. Fortune Brands earlier this month announced that CEO Nicholas Fink was departing to pursue another leadership opportunity. That same day, it reported weak quarterly results, sending shares down 18%. It said it would be replacing Fink with Amit Banati, an existing board member with a background in consumer products, effective in May. Banati has most recently been the chief financial officer of Kenvue (NYSE: KVUE), the Tylenol and Listerine maker being sold to Kimberly-Clark (NASDAQ: KMB). Garden is concerned Fortune Brands is rushing into a mistake with its leadership after announcing Banati just one day after Fink informed the company that he was leaving. Garden saw Fink—who was tapped as CEO about six years ago—as lacking leadership and industry experience, according to the people familiar with the matter. He views tapping Banati as making the same mistake, the people said. Garden sees an opportunity to build Fortune Brands over the next decade both organically and through mergers and acquisitions, once better corporate governance is in place, the people said. The firm isn’t pushing for any separation of the business, but wants to run a fresh CEO succession process, they added. A spokesperson for Fortune Brands confirmed it had received Garden’s nominees and said the company’s board was engaging constructively with Garden. “Fortune Brands remains focused on taking proactive actions in response to a challenging market environment, including enhancing profitability and continuing to invest in the innovations and capabilities that support sustainable, long-term shareholder value,” the spokesperson said. Garden Investments was started by Garden as a family office roughly two years ago, after he departed Trian Fund Management, another firm he helped start alongside Nelson Peltz. Last year, Garden took a stake in kitchen-equipment maker Middleby (NASDAQ: MIDD) and pushed for changes before he joined the board. Billionaire investor Josh Harris’s firm, 26North Partners, struck a deal late last year to take a controlling stake in Middleby’s kitchen-products division, which owns brands like Viking and Rangemaster. While he was at Trian, Garden took a board seat at the once sprawling conglomerate General Electric (NYSE: GE) and helped recruit new leadership. After the company broke into three, Garden maintains a board seat at GE Aerospace. The building products industry in the U.S. has been under pressure with existing home sales at multidecade lows. The Trump administration has been pushing for new-home construction, in an attempt to increase supply and lower home prices. Companies like Home Depot (NYSE: HD), Lowe’s (NYSE: LOW), and QXO (NYSE: QXO) have looked to take advantage of an industry that has fallen out of favor by striking a series of big building-products deals in recent months. Garden Investments sees a chance for Fortune Brands to be able to seize on a similar opportunity, the people familiar with the matter said.

Read the article

2/20/2026

Jack in the Box, Facing Sardar Biglari, has a Tough Quarter

Restaurant Business (02/20/26) Maze, Jonathan

Jack in the Box’s (NASDAQ: JACK) latest disappointing quarter came at a tough time. The San Diego-based fast-food chain on Wednesday reported that its same-store sales declined 6.7% last quarter, the company’s fiscal first. That was lower than Wall Street expected. “We got off to a tough start to the quarter,” CEO Lance Tucker said. “And while we did experience some bright spots throughout the quarter, the end of the calendar year didn’t improve to the degree we were looking for.” The sales weakness came with the additional problem of rising commodity costs, notably beef. Restaurant-level profit margins were 16.1% in the quarter, down from 23.2% a year ago. “We’re seeing pressure on four-wall EBITDA right now between the sales conditions and then beef inflation, in particular,” Tucker said, referring to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Executives said that sales in January have shown improvement, both on a one- and a two-year basis. But the combination of disappointing sales and falling profits took a toll on Jack in the Box's stock price, which plunged 16% Friday. The company hardly needs that kind of decline. Jack in the Box's stock has lost more than half of its value since the beginning of last year and is down more than 80% over the past five years. Jack in the Box is currently working to defend its chairman, David Goebel, who is the subject to a “vote no” campaign from investor Sardar Biglari. The investor wants shareholders to vote against Goebel as a message to the company. Earlier in the week, advisory firms that make recommendations on proxy fights split on their recommendations. Institutional Shareholder Services agreed with Jack in the Box. Glass Lewis agreed with Biglari. Jack in the Box's sales challenges have come during a difficult time in the fast-food space, and the chain is hardly alone. Wendy's (NASDAQ: WEN), another big fast-food chain, just reported the worst quarter it's had in at least 20 years. Wingstop (NASDAQ: WING), the chicken wing chain, reported its first yearly same-store sales decline in more than 20 years. Chipotle (NYSE: CMG), Sweetgreen (NYSE: SG) and other chains are facing major questions over their own performance. Jack in the Box is making several changes in a bid to improve its financial and store-level performance. It is closing underperforming locations, believing that doing so will remove weak stores from the system while improving sales at nearby restaurants. It sold Del Taco last year. It is also paying down debt and is assessing refinancing options. Same-store sales so far in the current quarter have improved by at least two percentage points. At least part of that was due to the popularity of the Jibbi, a backpack charm given away with the chain's Munchie Meals, including a Chicken Supreme Munchie Meal celebrating the chain's 75th anniversary. Last week, the chain brought back the popular Hot Mess burger, which was paired with an Antenna Ball featuring a “Meat Riot Jack” head from one of the chain's Jack commercials. “We're not quite where we want to be, but we're certainly gaining on it and we're getting really good initial response to our 75th anniversary marketing,” Tucker said.

Read the article

2/19/2026

Amex, Deere, J&J Abandon Board Diversity Rule, Activist Says

Bloomberg (02/19/26) Green, Jeff

American Express Co. (NYSE: AXP), Deere & Co. (NYSE: DE), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) have dropped diversity criteria for selecting new board directors, according to a conservative shareholder group. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) is considering a similar change, Bloomberg confirmed earlier this week. The moves are the latest ways that pressure from conservatives is changing corporate management and governance. American Express signed an agreement in October with the nonprofit National Legal and Policy Center, a shareholder that opposes DEI programs at companies, according to a letter viewed by Bloomberg News. Deere made changes to its bylaws that came after a shareholder proposal was filed to seek their removal, said Paul Chesser, director of the NLPC’s Corporate Integrity Project. The group opted not to pursue the topic with Johnson & Johnson after the company verified it had already made the change, Chesser said. American Express, Deere, and Johnson & Johnson declined to respond to requests for a comment. The NLPC disclosed the American Express and Deere changes on its web page and provided documents verifying the changes at those companies. “They already see the DEI wave has gone in the opposite direction,” said Chesser. Companies have been rolling back diversity commitments for several years, spurred by a conservative backlash and legal pressure on corporate attempts to even the playing field for traditionally underrepresented groups. President Donald Trump accelerated the shift, as he made the elimination of what he called “illegal DEI” a central goal of his second administration through a series of executive orders. A U.S. federal appellate court this month rejected a challenge to key provisions of those directives. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal regulator tasked with policing workplace bias, is urging White men who feel they’ve been discriminated against to come forward and sue their employers. The agency also disclosed in a recent court filing that it’s investigating whether past DEI goals for hiring at Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE) were illegal. Nike has said it is cooperating with the investigation. American Express agreed to strike language from its criteria for board members mentioning “gender, race, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation and nationality,” according to the copy of the October agreement between American Express and NLPC. In response, NLPC agreed to withdraw its request for a shareholder vote. In the case of farm-equipment maker Deere, board bylaws for selected new directors no longer include a reference to “race, ethnicity, gender, and other types of diversity,” which the NLPC found in a previous version and shared in screen shots. Given the removal of the language, the group has dropped the issue with the company, Chesser said. Goldman is expected to remove race, gender identity, sexual orientation and other diversity factors from the measures its board considers when nominating directors. It’s weighing the change following a request last September from NLPC, a person familiar with the bank’s thinking said, asking not to be identified citing private discussions. The NLPC also approached Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE: CL) about the use of DEI criteria in board selection, Chesser said. Discussions with Johnson & Johnson determined the health care company’s policy was already changed, while Colgate-Palmolive hasn’t issued a formal response, he said. Colgate currently lists “race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and cultural background” among potential director criteria. About 58% of S&P 500 boards in 2025 reported having a policy similar to the National Football League’s so-called Rooney Rule, which includes a commitment to ensuring individuals from diverse groups are in the candidate pool when teams recruit new coaches. That’s the same ratio as in 2024, according to executive recruiter Spencer Stuart. Still, the same report found that only 78% of companies reported their board’s share of underrepresented minorities in 2025, down from 99% in 2024.

Read the article

4/29/2029

Shareholder Activism in Asia Drives Global Total to Record High

Nikkei Asia (04/29/29) Shikata, Masayuki

Activist shareholders had their busiest year on record in 2024, with the Asia-Pacific region making up a fifth of campaigns worldwide, pushing some companies higher in the stock market and spurring others to consider going private. The worldwide tally of activist campaigns rose by six to 258, up by half from three years earlier, according to data from financial advisory Lazard. Campaigns in the Asia-Pacific tripled over that period to 57, growing about 30% on the year. Japan accounted for more than 60% of the regional total with 37, an all-time high. Activity is picking up this year as well in the run-up to general shareholders meetings in June. South Korea saw 14 campaigns, a jump of 10 from 2023. Critics say South Korean conglomerates are often controlled by minority investors that care too little about other shareholders. Australia and Hong Kong saw increases of one activist campaign each. North America made up half the global total, down from 60% in 2022 and 85% in 2014. Europe had 62 campaigns last year. The upswing in Japan has been fueled by the push for corporate governance reform since 2013 and the Tokyo Stock Exchange's 2023 call for companies to be more mindful of their share prices. The bourse has encouraged corporations to focus less on share buybacks and dividends than on steps for long-term growth, such as capital spending and the sale of unprofitable businesses. Demands for capital allocation to improve return on investment accounted for 51% of activist activity in Japan last year, significantly higher than the five-year average of 32%. U.S.-based Dalton Investments called on Japanese snack maker Ezaki Glico (2206) to amend its articles of incorporation to allow shareholder returns to be decided by investors as well, not just the board of directors. Though the proposal was rejected, it won more than 40% support, and Glico itself put forward a similar measure that was approved at the following general shareholders meeting in March. U.K.-based Palliser Capital took a stake last year in developer Tokyo Tatemono (8804) and argued that more efficient use of its capital, such as selling a cross-held stake in peer Hulic, would boost corporate value. Activist investors are increasingly seeking to lock in unrealized gains from rising land prices, reaping quick profits from property sales that can go toward dividends. Companies in the Tokyo Stock Exchange's broad Topix index had 25.88 trillion yen ($181 billion at current rates) in unrealized gains on property holdings at the end of March 2024, up about 20% from four years earlier. After buying into Mitsui Fudosan (8801) in 2024, U.S.-based Elliott Investment Management this year took a stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development (8830) and is expected to push for the developer to sell real estate holdings. This month, Dalton sent a letter to Fuji Media Holdings (4676), parent of Fuji Television, calling for it to spin off its real estate business and replace its board of directors. Activist campaigns have sparked share price rallies at some companies. Shares of elevator maker Fujitec (6406) were up roughly 80% from March 2023, when it dismissed Takakazu Uchiyama -- a member of the founding family -- as chairman under pressure from Oasis Management. The rise in demands from activists "creates a sense of tension among management, including at companies that don't receive such proposals," said Masatoshi Kikuchi, chief equity strategist at Mizuho Securities. Previously tight cross-shareholdings are being unwound, and reasonable proposals from minority investors are more likely to garner support from foreign shareholders. Some companies are going private to shield themselves from perceived pressure. Investments by buyout funds targeting mature companies in the Asia-Pacific were the highest in three years in 2024, according to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Toyota Industries (6201) is considering going this route after facing pressure from investment funds last year to take steps such as dissolving a parent-child listing with a subsidiary and buying back more shares. Toyota Industries holds a 9% stake in Toyota Motor (7203). The automaker "may have proposed having [Toyota Industries] go private as a precautionary measure," said a source at an investment bank.

Read the article

1/16/2027

Dealmakers See More Retail Mergers and IPOs in 2026 After Tariffs Sidelined M&A Last Year

Reuters (01/16/27) Summerville, Abigail

Dealmakers predict an uptick in mergers and IPOs for retailers and consumer goods companies this year after punishing tariffs on imports to the United States had sidelined activity in the industry for the first half of 2025. Several national restaurant and convenience store chains are primed for IPOs, along with organic baby food company Once Upon a Farm, Hellman & Friedman-backed auto repair company Caliber Holdings, and Bob’s Discount Furniture, which is owned by Bain Capital, according to more than two dozen CEOs, M&A advisors and private equity investors who attended the ICR Conference in Orlando, Florida this week. “The number of high-quality companies that are in queue to go public in 2026 is higher than we’ve seen since 2021,” Ben Frost, Goldman Sachs' (GS) global co-head of the consumer retail group said in an interview. “The question is does that mean more will go public? If it does, private investors will see the ability to exit investments again (in a) regular way, which will help (private equity) activity.” Frost was one of the more than 3,000 attendees at the annual gathering, where executives from Walmart (WMT.O), Shake Shack (SHAK.N), and Jersey Mike’s were among presenters while bankers, lawyers and private equity investors spent much of their time brokering deals and landing clients behind the scenes. The upbeat mood was a marked shift from last spring after U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements sent markets skidding and killed or stalled several consumer and retail deals. The second half of the year saw a resurgence in activity that brought with it several mega deals, including Kimberly-Clark’s (KMB.O) nearly $50 billion deal to buy Kenvue (KVUE.N), announced in November. "(Companies) are still really focused on growth and synergies. They’re looking at bigger deals than they’ve been willing to do for the last number of years. The back half of last year was the start of that,” Frost said. Kraft Heinz (KHC.O) announced in September it would split into two companies to unwind its 2015 merger, shortly after Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP.O) had agreed to buy JDE Peet’s for $18 billion with plans to split the coffee and non-coffee beverages into separate companies. In apparel, Gildan Activewear (GIL) bought Hanesbrands for $2.2 billion. Investors could also spur more deals and corporate breakups in the sectors, Audra Cohen, co-head of the consumer and retail group at law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, said in an interview at the conference. Corporate agitators have taken recent stakes in Lululemon Athletica (LULU.O) and Target (TGT.N), but aren't yet pushing for M&A. Lululemon hosted a morning yoga class and its management team met with analysts and investors at the conference. Meanwhile, private equity buyers are beating out companies for some deals, Manna Tree Partners co-founder Ellie Rubenstein told Reuters. Her firm sold its cottage cheese brand Good Culture to a larger consumer-focused firm L Catterton just last week. “A lot of these brands have gotten lost (inside big corporations) and the consumers don’t like it. You may see a lot of corporate carveouts this year,” Rubenstein told Reuters in an interview after her keynote address. She interviewed her billionaire father and Carlyle co-founder David Rubenstein, 76, on stage at the conference. The father-daughter pair contrasted their portfolios, pointing to Carlyle’s history of investing in fast food chains like McDonald's (MCD.N) and KFC Korea while Manna Tree saw big returns from investments in healthier food brands like pasture-raised egg producer Vital Farms (VITL.O) and Good Culture.

Read the article

2/27/2026

Target's Management Under Fire as Investors Agitate for Change

Reuters (02/27/26) Cavale, Siddharth

Over the last three years, retailer Target (TGT.N) has weathered intense criticism from consumers who have questioned its merchandise choices and policy decisions. Now it has another unhappy group to deal with: shareholders who are questioning management's decisions on everything from executive leadership to its plans to rebuild its reputation with the broader public. While big-box retailers like Walmart (WMT.O) and Costco (COST.O) have taken advantage of Americans' cost-conscious shopping, Target has struggled. Profit has dropped 14% over the last five years. Its shift away from diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in the wake of Donald Trump's return to the White House angered part of its consumer base and many long-time merchants. The DEI rollback prompted a boycott that hurt sales, then CEO Brian Cornell admitted. The company's market value is now $52 billion, about half of what it was in 2021, while Costco's value has risen to more than $430 billion, and Walmart's market cap has surpassed $1 trillion. Against that backdrop, several groups of Target investors are agitating for change. Major New York and California pension funds are supporting a proposal that would ensure independent board chairs after Cornell was elevated to board chair. Another investor group is pushing for answers to what it sees as missteps that have harmed its reputation with customers and cut into sales. "We are concerned that a series of recent public-facing decisions and communications by the company may have introduced reputational, operational, and financial risks at a moment when Target is already navigating a challenging competitive and macroeconomic environment," a group of 27 investors wrote in a Friday letter to the company's board and executive leadership, seen exclusively by Reuters. The investors did not propose specific fixes. It adds up to a challenging road for CEO Michael Fiddelke, who officially took the helm on February 1. He is expected to discuss his priorities for the year when the company reports results on March 3. The company is expected to report a 2.65% decline in same-store sales for 2025, according to LSEG data. "Target's top priority is getting back to growth, and our strategy to do so is rooted in four strategic priorities: leading with merchandising authority, providing a consistently elevated shopping experience, leveraging technology and strengthening team and community," the company told Reuters in a statement, noting it speaks regularly with investors. "We are confident the execution of this plan will drive the business forward and deliver sustained, long-term value for shareholders.” Since Fiddelke was named the next CEO in August 2025, he has cut 1,800 corporate roles and announced $1 billion in store investments. He later elevated two veteran merchandising executives to chief operating officer and chief merchandising officer and named two new board directors. "We believe the refresh of C?suite roles meaningfully improves execution potential and injects renewed strategic momentum into the organization," said Corey Tarlowe, Jefferies analyst, saying it "reinforces our view that TGT is taking deliberate steps to position the company for its next chapter of growth." Target’s merchandise was once a competitive advantage, earning it the playful name "Tar-zhay" for its cheap-chic apparel, but it has lost ground as competition from Walmart, Amazon (AMZN.O) and Costco intensifies. Shoppers have complained about out?of?stock issues and long checkout lines. "The strategy needs correction and execution needs improvement," Gerald Storch, Target's vice chairman between 1993 and 2005, told Reuters. "You see long lines, hyper?promotional deals, and a loss of focus on value," Storch said, pointing to the mix of buy?one?get?one offers and perks that contrast with everyday low prices at Walmart and Costco. The 27 investors asked how the retailer is evaluating reputational risks, including customer boycotts, and its plan to avoid letting external pressures undermine efforts to rebuild trust, increase traffic and stabilize earnings. Those investors collectively manage $150.5 billion in assets, and are led by Trillium Asset Management and Mercy Investment Services. Their letter added that "backlash from recent strategic adjustments" had affected "customer loyalty and foot traffic." According to a source familiar with the letter, this was a reference to Target's decision to back away from DEI, and its silence before speaking out about raids conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers at stores in the Minneapolis area, where the company is based. Other shareholders are upset with Target's decision to elevate longtime CEO Cornell to executive chairman, a position that continues to have operational oversight over Fiddelke. At least six investors that collectively own $500 million in Target shares, including the New York State Comptroller’s Office, the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), are in support of a push from shareholder advocacy group The Accountability Board that would make future board chairs independent. The proposal will be put to a non-binding vote at Target's annual meeting in June. Target's independent board members did not respond to multiple calls and emails seeking comment on the investors' corporate governance concerns. Officials at the New York State Comptroller's Office, which holds roughly $50 million in shares, told Reuters that they want Cornell to relinquish his board seat, citing disappointment with Target's retreat from diversity initiatives and the level of oversight surrounding these changes. Six similar proposals since 2014 at Target have failed, with support peaking in 2014 at 45.8%. Matt Prescott, president of The Accountability Board, believes the campaign has more momentum this year with the arrival of an investor. Toms Capital Investment Management took a 0.6% stake as of December 31, seeking to turn around Target's grocery business among other priorities, according to a source familiar with its thinking. TCIM declined comment; co?founder Ben Pass did not respond to multiple requests for comment. After Reuters asked Target about investor concerns related to its governance structure, the company added a statement to its website emphasizing that all board members except Cornell and Fiddelke are independent under New York Stock Exchange standards, and that no other directors are current or former employees. The website now includes a table listing directors' affiliations with other corporate boards.

Read the article

2/26/2026

Korea's Market Rally Shifts Tone in Shareholder Activism

Korea Herald (02/26/26) Eun-byel, Im

Activist hedge funds were once treated as unwelcome agitators in South Korea, often turned away at corporate doorsteps. Wary of short-term pressure and hostile campaigns, management viewed them as disruptive forces threatening their control and stability. While a full detente has yet to emerge, the mood is shifting. Amid a blistering stock market rally, shareholder activism has moderated, as rising valuations ease the urgency for direct confrontation. On top of that, corporations appear increasingly willing to engage — and in some cases quietly welcome -- activist scrutiny as a catalyst to lift share prices and narrow the long-standing “Korea discount.” “South Korea activism slowed moderately in 2025 as a rapidly rising stock market was seen to reduce the need for direct action by shareholders,” Diligent Market Intelligence said in a recent report. The number of Korea-based companies subject to activist demands fell to 60 in 2025, down from 66 in 2024 and 77 in 2023. DMI attributed the decline largely to the sharp rally in domestic equities, noting that rising market values may have reduced the immediate need for proxy fights and public campaigns. Industry officials suggest the shift is not merely cyclical but structural. Traditionally, many conglomerates have tolerated undervalued share prices to help founding families maintain control with relatively small stakes and to limit their inheritance and tax burdens. That calculus is beginning to change. The government's push to boost corporate valuations and improve shareholder returns has altered incentives. Companies are paying closer attention to the performance of their shares and reassessing their stance toward activist investors. “SK Square is said to be satisfied with Palliser Capital's campaign last year. This marks a striking contrast to its previous wariness toward such campaigns,” said an official closely associated with foreign hedge funds investing in Korea. In October 2024, British investment manager Palliser Capital disclosed it had more than a 1 percent stake in SK Square (KRX: 402340), the investment arm of SK Group, and pushed the company to unlock value through expanded investments and larger treasury share buybacks. From then, SK Square's shares surged more than sevenfold, rising from around 78,000 won to roughly 560,000 won earlier this month, before reports surfaced that the fund had trimmed part of its holdings. While the stock climbed alongside the Kospi rally and a semiconductor-driven boost which lifted its affiliate SK hynix's (KRX: 000660) valuation, Palliser Capital's activist campaign was also a key driver of the increase, according to industry officials. In recent weeks, SK Square has seen a further surge in its stock, closing daytime trading at 679,000 won on Thursday, as U.S. hedge fund Third Point pushes the company to enhance its valuation. “Foreign activist funds increasingly share the view that Korean corporates are now willing to engage, something that was not possible in the past,” the official said. “Building on that consensus, more funds are showing interest and asking about companies here.” Palliser Capital has since launched a campaign engaging LG Chem (KRX: 051910), proposing measures that include the introduction of nonbinding shareholder proposals and the appointment of independent directors. LG Chem has agreed to put the proposals forward at its March shareholders' meeting — a development seen as significant in Korea's corporate environment. Though acceptance of the proposals remains uncertain, industry watchers say the mere fact they are formally tabled marks progress. “There is a clear shift in corporate mindset,” said an executive at a U.S. hedge fund that has long engaged with Korean companies. “There is still a long way to go, but even having the conversation itself is meaningful.” “Top Kospi companies have begun canceling sizeable volumes of treasury shares, reflecting both anticipation of tighter rules and a willingness to position ahead of the regulatory curve,” said Christy Tan, senior investment strategist at Franklin Templeton Institute. “We are encouraged by what we are seeing so far.”

Read the article

2/26/2026

Commentary: LSEG's Elliott-Lite Playbook May Just Be Enough

Reuters (02/26/26) Unmack, Neil

"London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG.L) is borrowing from the activist investor playbook, but only to a limited extent. The $57 billion data-to-exchange group on Thursday announced, opens new tab a share buyback alongside new revenue growth and EBITDA margin targets. The moves reinforce the case that artificial intelligence won’t kill the group, and should also go some way to pleasing pushy investor Elliott Management. But LSEG boss David Schwimmer will need to show he can keep reviving the depressed stock," says Neil Unmack, Reuters Breakingviews Associate Editor. "Schwimmer is doubly under pressure. Before Thursday, LSEG's shares had fallen nearly 30% in a year, amid fears that AI groups like Anthropic could replace or undercut financial data companies. And Elliott, known for sometimes hostile activist campaigns, popped up with a shareholding, raising expectations of a large share buyback, cost cuts and asset sales. LSEG is the largest customer of Breakingviews' owner Reuters, which provides news for the Workspace terminal and other products. While Elliott has not publicly articulated its demands, Schwimmer’s moves only go some way to meeting those that have been reported. LSEG's new 3-billion-pound share buyback is twice analysts' expectations, but trails the 5 billion pounds possible target that Elliott might have wanted, as suggested by a Reuters report. And Schwimmer seems opposed to radically changing the LSEG structure, which includes business from clearing, indexes, post-trade services as well as bourses. The case for such radical change, so far, is unclear. Selling down stable and richly valued assets like Tradeweb Markets (TW.O), or taking on more debt to turbocharge buybacks, would leave LSEG with less flexibility. Shareholders may also end up more exposed to the businesses that may be vulnerable to AI disruption. Schwimmer’s best defense, both to market panic and Elliott, is to show that his plan is working. Hence Thursday’s stated ambition to grow revenue at a "mid to high single digit" rate between 2027 and 2029, and to boost the EBITDA margin by 1.5 percentage points. While those targets are broadly consistent with analysts’ expectations, per Visible Alpha data, they should reassure that AI destruction is not on the horizon. LSEG is also providing more data on how AI is boosting its business. That includes giving the number of new customers plugging its data into AI models, or the fact that LSEG has achieved a 51% reduction in data quality issues over four years. Additional disclosure on customer retention rates and new product use may also help. A 6% share price bump on Thursday should buy Schwimmer time from Elliott and other shareholders. LSEG is now worth around 18 times forward earnings, in line with typically more lowly-rated European exchanges Euronext (ENX.PA) and Deutsche Boerse (DB1Gn.DE). Yet it's still at a 28% valuation discount to U.S. peers MSCI (MSCI.N), S&P Global (SPGI.N), and CME (CME.O), which on average trade at 25 times forward earnings. The case for sticking with Schwimmer's activist-lite plan rests on closing that gap."

Read the article

2/26/2026

The Activist vs the Carmaker: How Elliott Forced Toyota Into $35 Billion Showdown

Financial Times (02/26/26) Keohane, David; Dempsey, Harry

A showdown between the world’s most prominent investor and biggest carmaker over a ¥5.4 trillion ($35 billion) take-private deal is hurtling towards a conclusion that could have far-reaching implications for Japanese companies and their global investors. Elliott Management has been locked in a months-long battle with Toyota Motor (NYSE: TM). The U.S. fund founded by Paul Singer, with $80 billion under management, is pressing Akio Toyoda’s group to increase its offer price to take its largest subsidiary private. But Toyoda, who has invested ¥1 billion of his own money into the privatization, and the carmaker have resisted. While Toyota Motor, which has a market capitalization of $380 billion, has raised the price for its subsidiary Toyota Industries (TYO: 6201) by 15%, it has stuck by an offer of ¥18,800 a share, a figure that Elliott contends is still not enough. What happens next — whether Toyota raises its offer price, the deal goes through or it collapses — could force Japanese companies to think harder about price to avoid a public fight and embolden other activists trying to force better offers. As activist activity has exploded in the country, similar battles are playing out at smaller companies. Oasis is in a fight for control of Kusuri no Aoki (TYO: 3549), a drugstore chain dating back to the 19th century. Effissimo Capital Management launched a successful counter-offer after the founding family of car-products company Soft99 (TYO: 4464) attempted a management buyout. “Everyone is looking at this situation and taking notes,” said an investor at a smaller activist fund in Japan. “Elliott might be unique in its size, but we are taking a lot of lessons from what they are doing.” Toyota Motor unveiled its bid to take Toyota Industries, a key parts supplier and forklift maker, private last June. The buyout would unwind one of the group’s biggest crossholdings, an out-of-favor ownership model in which companies own shares in each other and that has been the target of corporate governance reform efforts. The proposal was praised for seeking to undo crossholdings, which can lead to abuses of minority shareholder rights, and for setting the tone for the rest of corporate Japan. But it also attracted criticism from investors and corporate governance experts for its low offer and opaque valuation methods. Critics said Toyoda stood to personally gain from the transaction, while supporters suggested the move was meant to protect Toyota Industries from activist pursuits. In November, Elliott revealed a stake in Toyota Industries that has since grown to more than 7%. Toyota then raised its offer, but it remains below Toyota Industries’ share price of ¥20,240, meaning shareholders can get better returns selling in the market. A deadline of February 12 passed with Toyota failing to secure the two-thirds of shares needed to take the company private. “If one excludes the estimated longtime financial crossholders and the corporate crossholders, only 5-10% of [minority shareholders] actually tendered their shares by the deadline,” said Travis Lundy, an independent special situations analyst. Investors now have until Monday to tender their shares, but with the offer unchanged they have little incentive to do so. Elliott and other activists have made offers for specific stakes at higher levels than the tender. Elliott has said closer to ¥26,000 is a fairer price and criticized the special committee set up by Toyota Industries to evaluate the offer for eventually recommending the deal to shareholders. People familiar with the special committee’s thinking hit back, arguing that any criticism had to take into account where shares were before news of the offer broke last year. They and some investors have argued that the market price might be inflated by expectations that Elliott will launch its own tender for some or part of the company at a higher price, something people close to the fund admit is unlikely. At close to $3 billion as of January according to public filings, the Toyota Industries stake is one of Elliott’s biggest positions, though the figure could be larger as it does not include exposure through derivatives. Gordon Singer, Elliott’s co-managing partner, is directly involved and being briefed multiple times a week, said people close to the firm. In its pursuit, Elliott has gone more public and been more aggressive with Toyota Industries than in previous Japan campaigns. A person close to the fund said it did not intend “to make a big statement” when it waded into the deal, but it had “become a fight that was important for minority shareholder rights." Elliott has released a standalone plan for Toyota Industries that it claims could boost longer-term value to more than ¥40,000 a share and conducted briefings with proxy advisers, which it did not do in previous campaigns against SoftBank Group (TYO: 9984), Toshiba, and Tokyo Gas (TYO: 9531). In a letter to shareholders in January, it said a successful tender at Toyota’s current offer price would “result in a substantial and potentially irreversible setback for Japan’s corporate governance reforms." If Elliott fails to get a price boost or the deal falls apart, the fund could exit or wage a more protracted fight to reshape strategy at Toyota. Investors have long clamored for the group to buy their subsidiaries, but for Toyoda — the group’s powerful chair and a member of the founding family — the take-private is about legacy as much as economics and governance, said people close to the company. “The culture of Toyota Industries is quite important to Toyota Group people. [The deal] won’t particularly strengthen a vertical supply chain [but] Toyota Industries is part of the emperor’s family,” said one of the people. If Toyota fails to get the shares necessary again by Monday, its choices narrow. It can extend again for up to 60 business days from the original deadline without changing the terms of the tender, raise the price or walk away to potentially try again later. Regardless of the outcome, “there is a template being created here” in which boards will want to avoid a public fight, said a senior banker who specializes in defending against activists. Another investment banker said: “The advice I will give to companies with even more emphasis after this is that they need to pay a fair premium at the start or it will be a mess.”

Read the article

2/23/2026

Hedge Funds Are Betting Big on Industrials in 2026. Here Are Their Favorite Picks

CNBC Pro (02/23/26) Imbert, Fred

Industrials are the “it” sector of the stock market for hedge funds. Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) analyzed regulatory filings from more than 1,000 hedge funds – with gross equity positions totaling $4.4 trillion to start the year – and found that most funds are heavily overweight industrials. The bank said hedge funds entered 2026 overweight the sector by more than 7.34 percentage points relative to the Russell 3000, a record. “Hedge funds rotated toward cyclical sectors during 4Q 2025. Funds increased overweights in Industrials by +371 bp, the largest change of any sector,” Goldman strategist Ben Snider wrote. That allocation has paid off thus far. The S&P 500 industrials sector is up 14.2% year to date. That makes it the third-best performer in that time. Over the past 12 months, industrials are up a whopping 31.5%, making the sector the biggest gainer within the benchmark over that period. Goldman Sachs also found the industrial stocks that hedge funds bought into the most, looking at the ones with the largest net position increased quarter over quarter. T1 Energy (NYSE: TE), which makes electrical components and equipment, saw 36 hedge funds increase positions in the fourth quarter of 2025 from the third quarter. Shares are down 7% year to date, but they have soared more than 250% over the past 12 months. In the past three months, the stock is also up more than 128%. Carrier Global (NYSE: CARR) was also among the most popular industrial picks among hedge funds, with 33 adding to their positions. The stock has climbed more than 21% in 2026. Other popular industrials among hedge funds include ITT (NYSE: ITT), Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE), and Everus Construction (NYSE: ECG).

Read the article

2/21/2026

Cevian and Artisan Partners Sink Their Teeth Into Pearson

The Times (London) (02/21/26) Turvill, William

Cevian and Artisan Partners have built up huge stakes in FTSE 100 education giant Pearson, meaning that more than a third of its stock is now held by potentially troublesome shareholders. Cevian, the Swedish giant backed by U.S. activist Carl Icahn, now has an 18% stake in the business. Previously, when its stake stood at 12%, the fund said Pearson should move its share listing from London to New York. U.S.-based Artisan Partners, a long-term “value” investor that has previously lobbied for change at Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Danone (OTCMKTS: DANOY), and Credit Suisse, has also doubled its stake, from 5% to 10%, it disclosed last week. Artisan said it was “open” to a stock market move but was not actively pushing for one. London’s Silchester, a publicity-shy investor, also has a stake of nearly 6%. Pearson, led by former Accenture (NYSE: ACN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) executive Omar Abbosh since 2024, has experienced a rough ride on the stock market over the past year, with shares down 32% leaving it with a market value of £5.8 billion. Before its recent fall, prompted in part by fears of disruption from artificial intelligence (AI), Pearson, which has its headquarters in the UK but makes most of its money in the United States, had been on a strong run. Tyler Redd, an analyst at Artisan, said his firm saw Pearson as an undervalued stock that offered a long-term value. He said that some investors had incorrectly placed Pearson in the “AI loser bucket.” Managing director David Samra said Artisan was “very happy” with Abbosh’s leadership and the direction of the business. Asked about whether Pearson should move its listing to New York, he said: “We’re open to it if [the board] think it’s going to add value in some way… but we’re not actively pushing it.” He added: “Ultimately, it is the economics of the business that will dictate the outcome of the share price rather than simply where it is listed. After all, companies like BAE Systems (OTCMKTS: BAESY) and Babcock International (OTCMKTS: BCKIY) have had no trouble attracting interest to their shares over the last 12 months.” Five years ago, Pearson had a reputation as an academic textbook publisher plagued by profit warnings, but under Andy Bird and then Abbosh as chief executive, the company has transformed itself into a tech-savvy education firm. Pearson, whose biggest clients include universities and training businesses, has developed numerous generative AI-enabled technologies. These can help teachers improve their efficiency and students with their studies, for instance with AI tutors that can answer questions and set them quizzes. However, in recent months, Pearson has been among a large cohort of software developing companies that have seen their share prices hit by fears of AI disruption. Some investors fear that technology businesses such as Anthropic will be able to develop similar tools to Pearson and offer them at cheaper prices. Cevian declined to comment. A Pearson spokesperson said: “Pearson has a unique role at the intersection of education, skills, and workforce development with an increasing market opportunity for learning in the age of AI. As we deliver on our strategy, we engage in open and constructive dialogue with our shareholders.”

Read the article

2/19/2026

Cruising for Trouble: Activist Investor Elliott Chastises Norwegian Board for CEO Picks

The Daily Upside (02/19/26)

It’s anything but smooth sailing for Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE: NCLH) and its new CEO. The company, which has struggled recently to keep up with rivals like Royal Caribbean and Carnival, announced last week that former Subway Restaurants chief executive John Chidsey was taking over as CEO, effective immediately. Stocks fell more than 7% on Friday after the news, and that wasn’t the worst of it. On Tuesday, Elliott Investment Management, which says it now holds a stake of more than 10% in Norwegian Cruise Line, sent a letter to the company’s board arguing that directors have failed to fulfill their duties — most notably, selecting the right leadership. “In 2015, the Board appointed a CEO whose tenure was defined by wasteful spending, misguided strategy and a share-price decline of more than 50%,” Elliott said in the letter. “The board then saw fit to appoint this CEO’s protégé, whose poorly executed strategic pivots and repeated guidance misses drove further underperformance of more than 140% relative to Norwegian’s peers.” Chidsey was certainly not spared: “Last week, shareholders abruptly received the troubling news that the same board that oversaw all of this value destruction had selected one of its own long-tenured members, who lacks any executive experience in the cruise industry, to be the company’s next chief executive.” In a statement to The Daily Upside, Norwegian said Elliott’s letter was its first feedback to the board on strategy and progress. “We are committed to delivering durable, long-term value creation, which will be led by our recently appointed CEO, John Chidsey,” the company added. Its next earnings call is March 2, and Reuters reports that the deadline for new board nominees is March 13. Elliott, which declined to comment beyond its press release and letter, seems to think it can turn this ship around: The company proposed a variety of changes at Norwegian, including adding board members with relevant experience, reviewing the executive leadership team and developing a new business plan. Elliott Partner John Pike and Portfolio Manager Bobby Xu, who signed the letter, said that they see a path for the stock to hit $56 per share, a roughly 159% increase from Friday's close. (The shares surged 12% on Tuesday.) Norwegian isn’t the only travel company facing criticism from an investor. Starboard Value released a letter Tuesday that it sent to Tripadvisor (NASDAQ: TRIP), calling for a board shakeup and criticizing the site operator’s approach to generative AI. Starboard says it now has a 9% stake in Tripadvisor.

Read the article

2/17/2026

Investor Pressure Mounts: Shareholder Activism in Europe

Financier Worldwide (02/17/26)

Shareholder activism has become increasingly popular among investors seeking to influence corporate actions. It encompasses a range of strategies that, while never guaranteeing success, can exert meaningful pressure on management teams and boards to implement significant organizational and structural changes. Long established in the United States, shareholder activism is rapidly gaining momentum elsewhere. Across Europe, dissatisfied investors have in recent years launched a series of campaigns pressing companies for greater transparency, accountability and alignment with shareholder interests. “We have seen a clear uptick in robust activism across European markets,” says Arne Grimme, a partner at De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. “Italy, the UK and Germany have experienced a notable rise in public campaigns, while in the Netherlands most activism occurs behind the scenes, with public campaigns representing only a fraction of total activity.” “Activists frequently seek board representation,” he continues. “The rationale is straightforward: a board seat provides direct influence over the core issues in their campaigns, like strategy, capital allocation, shareholder returns, M&A and operational efficiency.” According to Diligent Market Intelligence's 'Corporate Governance in Europe 2025' report, the UK is currently the most active market in Europe for shareholder activism, having recorded a 44 percent year on year increase in the number of engaged companies. Between September 2024 and August 2025, 52 UK companies faced activist campaigns compared with 36 during the same period in 2024. This demonstrates a clear rise in shareholder engagement. The Diligent report also highlights that although smaller-cap companies made up nearly 70% of all UK activism, many large-cap campaigns were driven by prominent U.S. activists who are increasingly seeking value opportunities in the European market. Germany remains Europe's most contested activism landscape after the UK. During the first eight months of 2025, activists secured six board seats, an increase from four in 2024. Many of these campaigns centered on improving operational efficiency, reducing costs and pursuing consolidation strategies. Europe’s varied corporate governance regimes and differing board election mechanisms have significantly shaped these developments. Italy’s distinctive slate voting system has allowed activists to reshape boards quietly, with five seats gained during the first eight months of 2025, up from four in both 2023 and 2024. In France, public campaigns are still relatively uncommon, with only three launched during the first eight months of 2025. However, activists have become bolder and are increasingly prepared to escalate to public initiatives when private discussions fail to deliver results. Despite the growing openness to public-facing campaigns in France, European activists generally begin discreetly by approaching management, other shareholders and occasionally regulators behind closed doors. Campaigns that achieve traction tend to prioritize private engagement and focus on governance or operational improvements rather than solely financial issues. “Activism unfolds differently in Europe compared to the United States,” affirms Grimme. “In the Netherlands, for example, there are no proxy fights from day one and limited aggressive public campaigns. Activists first seek engagement with the chief executive and chairperson, then build on that relationship.” Establishing this engagement is not always straightforward. “Most Dutch companies have a governance structure allowing boards to make binding nominations for their own members, who must satisfy carefully drafted profile requirements,” explains Grimme. “We have seen activists attempt to influence these board profiles or individual role specifications instead.” Legal frameworks create further complications. Dutch law requires board members to act in the best interests of the company, taking into account all stakeholders. “There is no overriding obligation toward shareholders, a concept which U.S. activists in particular struggle to accept,” adds Grimme. “This framework makes it difficult for activists to get a seat at the table. The real threat in the Dutch context is mobilized shareholder support. Once a critical mass of shareholders turns against the company, the Dutch legal system offers boards no protection.” Following a temporary slowdown in activism during the final months of 2025 due to U.S. tariffs, so-called ‘watch and wait’ activists are expected to return in significant numbers. Their renewed interest is likely to be driven by market volatility, increased scrutiny of chief executive remuneration and a resurgence in public to private transactions. In its latest ‘European Activist Alert,’ Alvarez & Marsal (A&M) forecasts a renewed wave of activism across Europe in 2026. Germany is viewed as having substantial value creation opportunities that are expected to trigger a rise in campaigns, particularly within the industrial, technology and materials sectors. The UK is also expected to see a recovery in activist activity, with the consumer sector drawing particular interest. Switzerland is projected to attract growing activist attention, especially in the consumer, healthcare and technology industries. A&M additionally anticipates that France, Italy and Spain will experience increasing levels of activism, although from a lower starting point and at a more gradual pace. “We expect shareholder activism in Europe to remain prominent,” notes Grimme. “The trend toward constructive, behind the scenes engagement will likely continue, while the pressure on boards to deliver shareholder value will intensify.” As activism continues to evolve across Europe, companies will need to remain agile, transparent and responsive to investor expectations. Those that proactively engage with shareholders and address strategic concerns early are likely to be best positioned to withstand – and even benefit from – the growing momentum behind activist involvement.

Read the article

2/12/2026

Ancora Could See Multiple Ways to Win in Warner Bros. Fight

Bloomberg (02/12/26) Monks, Matthew

Ancora Holdings Group — the investor that jumped into the takeover fight for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (NASDAQ: WBD) Wednesday — has made a splash by showing up in high-profile M&A situations. The firm, whose activism arm is led by James Chadwick, played key roles in the mergers of United States Steel Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp. (NYSE: NSC), among others. Ancora unsuccessfully tried to scuttle US Steel's sale to Nippon Steel Corp. (OTCMKTS: NPSCY), while its winning push for management changes at Norfolk helped pave the way for the rail operator's mega-merger with Union Pacific Corp. (NYSE: UNP). Ancora, based in Cleveland, is urging Warner Bros. to reject Netflix Inc.'s (NASDAQ: NFLX) offer and reconsider a bid by Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ: PSKY), describing the Netflix offer as “inferior” while questioning the streaming giant's political pull. Regardless of whether Ancora succeeds, its Warner Bros. push shores up its reputation for making noise around some of the biggest names in corporate America make strategic moves. “In all of these situations we're looking for multiple ways to win,” Chadwick, president of Ancora's alternatives subsidiary, said at Bloomberg's activism conference last year. “We don't want to have one pathway to an exit or successful outcome. We're looking to design these in a way that there's multiple ways that this gets to a good outcome in the end.” The firm’s activist fund, Bellator, gained more than 17% in 2025, according to a person familiar with the matter who declined to be identified because the details aren’t public. A representative for Ancora wasn’t immediately available for comment. “Ancora has ascended to the top tier of activists over the past five years,” Lawrence Elbaum, M&A partner at Sullivan & Cromwell and co-head of the firm’s shareholder activism defense practice, said in a statement. “While one may think that’s because of its hard-fighting ways, a lot of the success has been driven by working with CEOs and directors behind the scenes. The firm has a lot of tools in its toolbox.” With about $11 billion in assets under management, Ancora started in 2003 as a registered investment adviser, or wealth advisory firm. Ancora Chief Executive Officer Fred DiSanto, looking to differentiate the firm by offering clients access to shareholder activism, recruited former Relational Investors executive Chadwick in 2014 lead the effort. It first started by targeting small companies such as Riverview Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ: RVSB) and DHI Group Inc. (NYSE: DHX). By 2022, Ancora had grown the hedge fund division, which houses its activist strategy, to about $1.2 billion. Having committed capital in hedge funds and the ability to raise special-purpose vehicles from its wealth-management base helped Ancora up its ambitions. In the early 2020s, the firm began targeting ever-bigger targets such as retailer Kohl’s Corp. (NYSE: KSS), packaging firm Berry Global and toy company Hasbro Inc. (NASDAQ: HAS). The firm’s breakout moment as a top-tier activist may have been its acrimonious campaign against Norfolk Southern, which ended in a partial victory as it placed three of its nominees on the board. Ancora had sought to win control of the board to force out Alan Shaw as chief executive officer. Chadwick burnished his reputation as an outspoken agitator at Norfolk Southern's 2024 annual meeting, when he called out passive institutional investors for their lack of support and said they would be culpable should the company have another deadly accident after the disastrous 2023 derailment in Ohio. Norfolk Southern fired Shaw in 2024 for a relationship with a colleague. With its Midwestern roots and ties to unions, Ancora initially tended to target old-line industries such as rail, industrials, manufacturing and packaging, though it has become more sector agnostic in recent years. It also has a particular interest on situations that touch its home market. “For us there’s somewhat connectivity to our own backyard where we live and where we work,” Chadwick said in an interview last year with CNBC. “Some of these stories we’re involved with when you talk about US Steel, obviously Cleveland has a long history in the steel industry, we have a lot of relationships in steel as well. So these things really hit home for us.”

Read the article

2/12/2026

Commentary: Toyota Gets a Stinging Buyout Bloody Nose

Reuters (02/12/26) Lockett, Hudson

Hudson Lockett, Asia Columnist for Reuters Breakingviews in Hong Kong, says, "Toyota has two options: take it on the chin now or risk a haymaker later. Insiders at the powerful industrial group have just received a stinging bloody nose in their battle to take Toyota Industries (6201.T) private for a lowball 5.65 trillion yen ($37 billion). The consortium that includes Toyota Motor (7203.T), its chair Akio Toyoda, and the family's unlisted Toyota Fudosan had to admit on Thursday that they had failed to convince independent shareholders in the forklift and car-parts maker to accept their woefully inadequate bid. So they're extending their tender offer a couple more weeks. That's unlikely to win over the many holdouts, leaving the consortium with the unpalatable choice of either raising the price substantially or dropping the deal and having Elliott Investment Management in their face for the foreseeable future. The wannabe buyers' announcement gives them time to raise the offer from its current 18,800 yen per share, despite asserting last month that they had “no intention” of doing so. But they also acknowledge that only 33% of outstanding shares have been tendered. Paul Singer’s Elliott, which owns a 7.1% stake in the target, says this equates to fewer than one in five independent shareholders tendering. That's a blow to the consortium’s assertion that the offer price “reflects the intrinsic value” of Industries. The activist on Friday repeated its call for investors not to tender shares and recommended that those few who already have to withdraw. With Industries shares jumping another 2% on Friday morning to their highest level since the deal’s announcement, the odds of Toyota convincing the other four-fifths to accept the current offer price look slim. The simplest path forward would be to raise their bid to meet Elliott’s stated valuation of 26,134 yen per share for the target. That would offer decent returns to motivate outside shareholders and provide some proof, should the activist press for more in court, that buyers ultimately engaged in good faith negotiation on the target’s valuation, albeit belatedly. This outcome is hardly ideal for Toyoda’s consortium, but the other option looks positively grueling: walk away from the deal and continue to grapple with the constant hassle of Elliott as Industries’ biggest external shareholder. In this scenario, the combative activist would probably press Industries to sell its cross-shareholdings with the rest of Toyota group and return the capital to all investors, rather than mostly to the insiders' consortium as envisaged in the buyout offer. That won't sit well with Toyota. However, the prospect of Elliott continually jabbing at Industries could yet provide impetus for an equitable deal before the new deadline."

Read the article

2/11/2026

Teradata Agrees to Board Changes With Lynrock Lake. The Stock Soars 22%.

Barron's (02/11/26) Wolf, Nate

Teradata (NYSE: TDC) is shaking up its board of directors as part of an agreement with investor Lynrock Lake. Wall Street seems to like the move. The board will appoint Melissa Fisher, previously the chief financial officer of Outreach.io, as a director by March 1, and will work with Lynrock Lake to identify another independent director to join the board later this year. Two current directors will retire over the next two years as part of the plan. Shares of Teradata, which makes a cloud database and data analytics platform, jumped 22% to $35.54 on Wednesday. Lynrock Lake filed a securities disclosure last March changing to the stance of an investor and announcing that it had amassed 9.4 million shares in Teradata—about 10% of the company. The investment firm viewed Teradata stock as undervalued and pushed for the hiring of a permanent chief financial officer. Teradata appointed John Ederer to that role two months later. Teradata shares have risen more than 45% over the last 12 months but remain well off their all-time closing high of $80.62 in September 2012. “We firmly believe in the long-term value potential of Teradata and look forward to Melissa’s contributions and further Board refreshment to advance the Company’s strategic initiatives and enhance value for all shareholders,” said Lynrock Lake CEO Cynthia Paul. As part of the agreement, Lynrock Lake will support the board’s full slate of directors at the company’s 2026 annual meeting, and also agreed to certain customary standstill provisions limiting further activist activity. The board shakeup came the same day Teradata breezed past earnings Wall Street’s expectations for the fourth quarter. The company posted adjusted earnings of 74 cents a share for the quarter, surpassing analysts’ estimates of 56 cents. Revenue was $421 million, up 3% from last year and above Wall Street’s call for $400.5 million. Teradata expects annual recurring revenue, or ARR, growth of 2% to 4% in 2026 and adjusted earnings of $2.60 a share at the midpoint. Analysts were looking for ARR growth of around 1% and adjusted earnings of $2.54 a share. The ARR forecast was the “biggest positive” of the earnings report, said UBS analyst Radi Sultan, who argued the company could exceed that 2% to 4% range. UBS reiterated a Neutral rating on the stock but bumped its price target to $36 from $23. Competition from more modern data vendors, such as Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW), Databricks, and Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR), is keeping UBS (NYSE: UBS) on the sidelines. “While these results are encouraging we have yet to pickup any major changes in the competitive outlook,” wrote Sultan.

Read the article

2/11/2026

Toyota, Elliott Clash Over $35 Billion Buyout Bid: 5 Things to Know

Nikkei Asia (02/11/26) Shiga, Yuichi

A proxy war is intensifying between Toyota Group (NYSE: TM) and Elliott Investment Management over the automaking group's 5.4-trillion-yen ($35 billion) plan to take its founding firm -- Toyota Industries (OTCMKTS: TYIDY)-- private. The New York hedge fund is urging shareholders not to accept the offer, saying the price is too low. Toyota Group counters that it is fair. Toyota Group aims to raise its combined ownership in Toyota Industries to 66.7% from 42%, as part of a plan to take the company private. Toyota Motor Chairman Akio Toyoda says that the founding firm must play a central role in the group's technological transformation, and that it should be freed from short-term shareholder pressures to try bold ideas. The transaction is also part of Toyota Group's broader effort to unwind cross-shareholdings. Under the strategy, for example, a portion of the buyout cost will be offset by Toyota Motor repurchasing shares held by Toyota Industries. The 29-day offer period is due to lapse on Thursday. How the proxy fight will play out is being closely watched by investors for clues to the fate of not only Toyota Group but also of corporate governance reforms in Japan, which have been a key factor driving the Japanese stock market that has doubled in value in the last three years. Here are five things to know: Founded a century ago by Sakichi Toyoda, a great grandfather of Akio Toyoda, Toyota Industries is today the world's top forklift manufacturer. Based in Kariya, central Japan, the company evolved from its origins as a small maker of textile looms to later produce cars and then forklifts -- a transformation Akio Toyoda calls an embodiment of the flexibility and innovativeness of the nation's largest manufacturing group. In 1949, the company went public on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Toyota Industries remains the mothership of Toyota Group, owning 9% of Toyota Motor, 11% of trading house Toyota Tsusho, nearly 6% of parts maker Denso and significant stakes in many other Toyota Group companies. More recently, however, Toyota Industries has faced intense investor pressure to improve asset efficiency and boost returns to shareholders: The value of its holdings of Toyota Group shares has grown almost equal to its own market capitalization. Analysts view the amount as too large to be disposed of in the open market or to be spent for capital investment or share buybacks. For Toyota Group, undoing the cross-shareholdings also carries the risk of making companies such as Toyota Industries more vulnerable to hostile takeover bids. Elliott says Toyota Industries, the world's largest forklift maker, can be made more profitable by improving its global operations and shifting its focus from the auto industry to logistics; Toyota Group decided that privatization was the best solution, but achieving that requires controlling more shares. On April 26, 2025, Nikkei reported the existence of such a plan for Toyota Industries. On June 3, Toyota Group formally announced a plan to launch a tender offer for Toyota Industries for 16,300 yen ($105) a share. Its goal is to fully acquire the company via a so-called squeeze-out, or the compulsory purchase of minority shareholders' stakes in a company. To achieve that, Toyota Group needs two-thirds, or 66.7%, support from shareholders. With Toyota Motor already owning 24.66%, the Group needs another 42%. A 29-day tender offer was launched on Jan. 15 for the takeover bid, or TOB. Toyota Group companies, including Denso, Toyota Tsusho, asset management arm Toyota Fudosan and parts maker Aisin, together own 18% of shares in Toyota Industries. The buyout is being led by Toyota Fudosan. The company and Akio Toyoda have set up a special purpose company and launched a 4.7-trillion-yen ($30.4 billion) tender offer, backed by Toyota Motor, which has supplied 0.7 trillion yen in preferred shares, and banks, which offered 2.8 trillion yen in loans. If the bid succeeds, an extraordinary shareholders meeting will be held to secure approval for the squeeze-out. If that succeeds, Toyota Industries is expected to go private as early as late-April. Koichi Ito, president of Toyota Industries, said during an online press conference in June last year that the company will "leverage the advantages of management freedom to maintain and strengthen sales" by delisting; The most controversial part of the TOB, is the offer price. When Toyota Group announced its offer of 16,300 yen a share for Toyota Industries on June 3, that marked an 11% discount from the day's closing price of 18,400 yen. Toyota justified the offer price, saying that the shares had already surged following the Nikkei report on April 26 and that the offer price represented a 23% premium on the closing price of 13,225 yen on April 25. Before then, Toyota Industries' shares hovered around 13,000 yen. Toyota Group also said that it had obtained opinions from three financial institutions calling the offer fair. "The takeover bid price is the best one which reflects the target company's essential value and we have no intention to change the takeover bid price," Toyota Asset Junbi, the acquiring company established by the Toyota group solely for the purpose of carrying out the bid, said in a statement early this month; On Nov. 11, Elliott disclosed its ownership of 3.26% of Toyota Industries shares. It says the TOB significantly undervalues Toyota Industries. It also says the process lacks transparency and falls short of proper governance practices. Toyota Group raised the bid price by 15% to 18,800 yen on Jan. 14, the day before it launched the 29-day tender offer, which rose to 5.4 trillion yen from the initial 4.7 trillion yen. But the U.S. investor dismissed the higher amount, arguing that the upward revision incorporates only a fraction of the increase in the value of Toyota Industries' publicly traded equity holdings. "The credibility of the Toyota Group and Japan's capital markets are at stake," the hedge fund warned. Corporate governance reform measures introduced in Japan since 2013 are precisely meant to protect shareholder interests in such situations, it argued. "If the Revised TOB is allowed to succeed, it will result in a substantial and potentially irreversible setback for Japan's corporate governance reforms and dampen investor interest in the Japanese market." On Feb. 5, Elliott raised its stake to 7.14%. Elliott maintains that Toyota Industries has an intrinsic net asset value of 26,134 yen per share, adding that the stock price could exceed 40,000 yen by March 2028 if the company improves its global operations, strengthens its product lineup for emerging markets and shifts its focus from the automotive business to logistics. While Toyota Industries has many attractive assets and businesses such as its mainstay forklift manufacturing, Elliott argues that the Japanese company faces governance issues. Toyota Industries says it understands many of the concerns voiced by Elliott, but is not persuaded by its argument that profitability can be improved as quickly as the hedge fund suggests; Toyota Group says in its TOB proposal that it will safeguard the interests of minority shareholders by securing support from a majority of them. But some investors question whether the "majority-of-minority" principle is being strictly upheld in the TOB process. Counting Denso, Aisin and Toyota Tsusho as minority shareholders is not fair, argues Kazunari Sakai, head of Japan research at London-based Asset Value Investors. "While Asset Value Investors continues to hold shares of Toyota Industries, we believe this tender offer price falls below the intrinsic value of the shares." He believes a minimum fair valuation is at least 25,000 yen per share.

Read the article

2/11/2026

Why Elliott Bet That LSEG Could Weather AI Storm

Financial Times (02/11/26) Asgari, Nikou; Barnes, Oliver; Armstrong, Ashley; et al.

With a 300-year history dating back to Jonathan’s Coffee House in the Square Mile, the London Stock Exchange Group (LON: LSEG) has survived technological upheaval before. Elliott is betting that the data and stock exchange group can weather the threat from AI, which has sent its shares tumbling. While best known for running the London Stock Exchange, LSEG makes most of its money by selling data on stocks, bonds, commodities and other assets to banks, brokers and investors. For months, investors have worried that the company’s business is at risk from powerful AI models capable of rapidly digesting and analyzing data. Doubts over the value of its analytics business, as AI tools become more powerful and pervasive, have wiped more than a third off the company’s value over the past year. Even as the threat of AI prompted sell-offs in wealth managers, insurance brokers and other legacy financial groups potentially exposed to the technology’s advance this month, the investor is reportedly unfazed. Elliott has been talking to LSEG’s leadership, according to people familiar with the matter, encouraging the group to boost its share buybacks and close the gap on profitability with its peers such as MSCI (NYSE: MSCI) and CME Group (NASDAQ: CME). Still, despite jumping on news of the investor’s stake on Wednesday, LSEG shares closed slightly down. The group said in a statement that it “maintains an active and open dialogue with our investors, while remaining focused on executing our strategy." LSEG has had to transform before. Under chief executive David Schwimmer it has become a financial data giant through the 2019 $27 billion acquisition of Refinitiv. The LSE itself now makes up just 4% of group revenues. Schwimmer has been resolute in his response to concerns over AI, telling investors in October that “AI cannot replicate or replace our real-time data.” LSEG’s data and analytics division accounted for nearly half of its profits in the third quarter. The chief executive is also expected to defend the group’s complicated, diverse structure as a strength at LSEG’s annual results at the end of the month. LSEG has argued that its collection of businesses — from its LCH clearing house to compliance unit Risk Intelligence and IFR financial journalism magazine — is an “all weather” strategy, according to one person close to the company. “The share price has been under pressure. Elliott’s appearance might help them to articulate the strategy and show how they will unlock value — particularly by applying AI and technology across its diverse business,” another person familiar with the company’s thinking said. Investor fears around AI were crystallized in July 2025, when San Francisco-based start up Anthropic launched its Claude for Financial Services tool, with sophisticated financial modeling capabilities. “Ever since Claude for Financial Services launched last summer, LSEG shares have been a lightning rod for market fears about AI disruption risk,” said Tom Mills, analyst at RBC Capital Markets. LSEG is also using AI. With Microsoft, which took a 4% stake in the group in 2022, LSEG has promoted itself as offering data and AI tools to carry out financial modeling, benchmarking and other services. But the impact has been muted. Ian White, senior analyst at Autonomous Research, said the appeal of using LSEG for customer-facing AI is being questioned: The UK company is now “not as broad in terms of relevance and applicability as [it] thought [it was] going to be." White added that the AI threat is more pronounced for LSEG than other exchange groups such as Euronext (OTCMKTS: ERNXY) and Deutsche Boerse (OTCMKTS: DBOEY), which make more of their money from traditional exchange businesses, rather than data and analytics. Many analysts argue that the group will be protected from AI’s advance by its unique, proprietary data. That can be plugged into others’ models through partnerships with OpenAI, Anthropic and software group Databricks, among others. The company’s data “is key to these models being successful,” said one person close to LSEG. Ben Needham, UK quality portfolio manager at Ninety One, a top 20 LSEG shareholder, said the company “is now quality at a very good price and we’ve been leaning in heavily [buying] in the last few weeks." He added that data and software companies “have been sold off indiscriminately” in the face of AI fears. Elliott’s position in LSEG points to its belief that the company should profit from the expected AI transformation in financial services, not falter. Its call for more buybacks could meet some resistance from a group that completed a £1 billion share buyback program last year and finished a further £1 billion in repurchases on Wednesday. “The market is addicted to the methadone of capital returns at the moment rather than the opportunity for long-term growth,” said one person familiar with the group’s business model. White of Autonomous said the company has the balance sheet space to consider buying back £3.5 billion more in shares, which could help appease Elliott. Cuts in areas such as “third party costs, IT expenses, consultant support” could improve profitability, he added. Another option to mollify the investor could be for LSEG to sell its roughly £10 billion stake in Tradeweb (NASDAQ: TW), an electronic debt trading platform that has grown rapidly in recent years. While other constituent parts of the group could be sold off, selling the LSE itself is not an option that Elliott has pushed for, according to people familiar with the situation. City advisers suggested that the business could still be unpicked with Elliott’s intervention, urging a more focused approach. For now, discussions have been friendly. But one adviser cautioned: “They kick people hard.”

Read the article

2/10/2026

Proxy Voting: Asset Managers Increased Their Support for Management in 2025

Morningstar (02/10/26) Stewart, Lindsey

Regulatory scrutiny of proxy voting intensified in 2025 amid political concerns that proxy advisers and large index managers were pushing coordinated, ESG-driven agendas against corporate management. However, Morningstar’s latest research suggests the opposite trend: the largest U.S. asset managers are increasingly voting in favor of company management rather than against it. Analyzing proxy votes from 50 major U.S. equity and allocation fund managers over the past three years, the study found average support for management proposals rose to just over 96% in the 2025 proxy year, up from about 95% previously. This increase was driven largely by stronger backing for director elections, which dominate management resolutions, as well as modestly higher support for executive pay proposals, despite those remaining the most contested. At the same time, support for shareholder proposals declined, particularly on environmental and social issues, which were most affected by the SEC’s tightening of permissible proposals. When broken down by size, voting patterns diverged sharply. The largest 10 managers—including BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard, and State Street—showed the strongest rise in management support, reaching nearly 98% on average, while their backing of shareholder proposals fell into single digits. Smaller managers were consistently more supportive of shareholder resolutions, though their support also declined year over year.The findings und erscore that proxy voting behavior varies widely by manager size. For investors focused on governance or sustainability outcomes, understanding how a fund manager votes—not just what it holds—is critical to aligning investments with personal priorities.

Read the article

2/10/2026

HoldCo Asset Management Enters Wall Street Banks’ Cozy Club

Barron's (02/10/26) Ungarino, Rebecca

As Wall Street executives descend on southeast Florida beaches for a trio of finance industry conferences this week, a small hedge fund that has pushed for change at U.S. banks is bearing its teeth. The founders of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based HoldCo Asset Management took the stage Monday at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Key Biscayne, where UBS (NYSE: UBS) hosted its annual conference of financial firms and investors. They outlined demands for several banks in a 69-page presentation. The founders, Vik Ghei and Misha Zaitzeff, laid out details of private discussions they’ve held with lenders including Central Pacific Financial (NYSE: CPF) and TrustCo Bank. HoldCo also signaled that while it’s pleased with changes some of the banks it holds have made, it will push for more. The fund has some $2.8 billion of assets. Ghei and Zaitzeff said they won't pursue proxy contests at two of their holdings, KeyBank and Eastern Bankshares (NASDAQ: EBC), after the companies made personnel and strategy changes that HoldCo was seeking. The chief executives of KeyBank and Eastern now have their support, they said. But if either firm’s board pursued actions “inconsistent with our expectations,” they would “take any action that we deem necessary” to drive value for shareholders. HoldCo also wrote that it believes M&T Bank (NYSE: MTB), the Buffalo, New York-based lender that analysts view as a potential acquirer, is “waiting in the wings” to purchase Eastern. Eastern Bank didn’t respond to requests for comment. A KeyBank spokeswoman declined to comment. A spokesman for M&T Bank said, “Our policy is to not comment on market rumors or speculation.” HoldCo’s presentation and its presence at a large industry conference underscored the fund’s growing influence on Wall Street. Conferences like the ones held by UBS, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), and KBW in Florida this week are normally the domain of management teams, not the investors demanding they rip up their playbooks. The founders’ conversation Monday with UBS bank analyst Erika Najarian suggested investors are paying attention to HoldCo’s moves. The fund gained attention in 2025 when the Ohio lender Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ: FITB) said it would buy Comerica—after HoldCo had publicly pressured Fifth Third to sell itself. It was a success for HoldCo in sector that has generally steered clear of high-profile investors. But the campaign was “a wake-up call to underperforming banks that a stronger partner might make more sense,” Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) bank analyst Mike Mayo wrote to clients on Feb. 4. As banks look for scale to stay competitive and adjust to an relaxed slate of financial regulations, bank mergers should reach the highest level in a decade, Mayo said. HoldCo’s small, influential team is poised for a busy year.

Read the article

2/6/2026

Commentary: Toyota’s Buyout Options all Come With a Taint

Reuters (02/06/26) Lockett, Hudson

Hudson Lockett, Reuters Breakingviews columnist, says, "The battle lines have been drawn. Toyota Motor (7203.T), its Chair Akio Toyoda, and the family's unlisted firm Toyota Fudosan insist they have “no intention” of raising their revised bid of 5.65 trillion yen ($36 billion) to take Toyota Industries private. That's far too low, Breakingviews calculates, as does Paul Singer's Elliott Investment Management, which is lobbying other independent investors not to sell shares in the tender offer that closes on Thursday. Whatever happens in the next few days, though, this deal will stand as a lesson in how to conduct M&A badly. If the buyer consortium wins, it - and by extension the Toyota brand - will be marked as shortchanging shareholders. At 18,800 yen-per-share, the new offer put on the table last month merely adjusted for the increase in Industries' holdings in other publicly traded Toyota companies and undervalues the target by 40%, Breakingviews calculates. The bidders have a big advantage in their push to obtain the 67% of shares necessary for a squeeze out: thanks to Toyota group holdings and those of allies, they have 50% already locked up. But a win would not be the end of the affair. Elliott, which owns 7.1% of Industries, would probably take the new owners to court to have the price reappraised. Japanese judges are typically wary of ruling on matters of valuation, but in October 2024, Tokyo’s high court ruled in favor of Oasis Management that the fair value of FamilyMart shares was 13% higher than Itochu's (8001.T) successful buyout offer. That case is still under appeal but will embolden shareholders to keep challenging lowball deals. Comments published on Thursday by the Asian Corporate Governance Association would strengthen Elliott's case. It points out potential red flags in how Industries' board special committee conducted negotiations. It also estimates that the median price for Japanese tender offers launched since fair M&A guidelines were introduced in 2019 is 2.5 times book value; Breakingviews calculates Toyoda and team are dangling a ratio of just 0.9 times book. Insiders can try to avoid court by meaningfully increasing the price. There's a good reason to do so: with the shares trading above the tender offer, index funds are unlikely to sell, and they hold around 19%. Add on Elliott's stake, and that's not far short of the 33.1% needed to block the deal. Bumping up the bid would help secure more support, but at the cost of a loss of face for the corporate titan. The other possibility is that they don't raise the price, investors block the buyout and the Toyota trio walk away from the transaction. That would expose them as cynical opportunists only willing to strike a deal at the heavy expense of supine independent shareholders. All these options would leave a taint on Toyota group. If nothing else, other Japanese corporations considering how to unwind cross-shareholdings may learn how not to do it from its example."

Read the article

2/2/2026

Proxy Battle Crashes Jack’s Birthday Party

San Diego Business Journal (02/02/2026) Bloodworth, Donald

Quick-service restaurant chain Jack in the Box Inc. (Nasdaq: JACK) appears to be headed toward a proxy fight, with an investor calling for change on the company board. Sardar Biglari, 48, runs Biglari Capital Corp. and Biglari Holdings (NYSE: BH) as well as other businesses. He is CEO of Steak ’n Shake and owner of the Western Sizzlin steakhouse chain. Biglari’s entities have amassed slightly less than 10% of Jack in the Box stock. A proxy statement sent to Jack in the Box stockholders by Biglari Capital states that “shareholders need to send a strong message” to their board “that the status quo is unacceptable. This message can be rendered by voting against the reelection of Chairman David Goebel.” Jack in the Box has set its annual meeting for Feb. 27. The moves come as Jack in the Box works to stem losses and get back on the path to growth following several setbacks, including the purchase and money-losing sale of Del Taco. A company representative said people should get their information from the proxy statement filed by Jack in the Box Inc. “The Board recommends that you simply disregard any materials sent to you by, or on behalf of, the Biglari Group,” says a proxy statement filed by the corporation, dated Jan. 21. “We are not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any information provided by, or relating to, the Biglari Group contained in any proxy solicitation materials filed or disseminated by, or on behalf of, the Biglari Group or any statements that the Biglari Group or its representatives have made or may otherwise make.” Goebel, 75, has been a company director since 2008 and chairman since 2020. He brings more than 40 years of leadership in retail, food service and hospitality to his job as chairman. “We believe that, under the right leadership and oversight, JACK can achieve long-term success, and we remain committed to working with leadership toward that end,” the proxy statement from Biglari Capital says. “In our view, however, the incumbent board does not have the right experience, skill set and/or willingness to address strategic missteps and reverse years of stockholder value destruction. As such, we felt compelled to take further action by bringing these issues directly to shareholders and allowing them to voice their dissatisfaction with the board and the company.” In addition to removing a board member, Biglari Capital’s proxy statement asks shareholders to reject pay raises for executives. Proxy statements from both Jack in the Box and Biglari Capital give timelines of events. According to Biglari Capital’s proxy statement, Biglari met with company officials in 2024 and 2025 to discuss finances, operations, his desire to sit on the board and whether his representatives might sit on the board. The Jack in the Box proxy statement says at one point, Biglari Group notified the company it was withdrawing its nomination of Biglari to the board. In November, Jack in the Box appointed two new board members and enlarged the board from eight to 10 members. Mark King and Alan Smolinisky joined the board in connection with a cooperation agreement between the company and one of its stockholders, GreenWood Investors LLC. Biglari Capital’s proxy statement alleges that Jack in the Box lost $460 million in its purchase and subsequent sale of Del Taco. “How can shareholders trust a board that just squandered $460 million?” the proxy statement says. The document also takes issue with the board hiring three CEOs in the last decade. This is not Biglari’s first push for change in the restaurant industry. According to Fortune magazine, the executive has attempted seven proxy battles with Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRL) and took part in the spirited national debate when the restaurant chain changed its logo last year. A shareholder dispute is not the kind of thing Jack in the Box’s marketing team wants to focus on. In addition to steering customers toward Jack in the Box stores, they would prefer to celebrate the 75th anniversary of Robert Peterson opening his first Jack in the Box store on El Cajon Boulevard in 1951. The year will bring several promotions and limited-time menu items to the chain, which now has roughly 2,135 company-owned and franchise outlets across the United States. On Jan. 14, the company invited a dozen reporters, bloggers, and TikTok videographers to the big kitchen in its corporate headquarters on Kearny Mesa. There they got the lowdown on 2026 promotions and assembled their own “Hot Mess” cheeseburgers, replete with runny cheese sauce, jalapeños and onion rings, all on a sourdough roll. The concoction was introduced in 2013 and will be available in stores this month. Meanwhile, the company is working on its financial situation. In mid-November, Jack in the Box reported same store sales in its fourth quarter declined 7.4% over Q4 of 2024, far surpassing the 2.1% decline reported one year ago. The business attributed the loss to a decrease in transactions and what it called “an unfavorable menu mix.” The business plans to report quarterly financial results again on Feb. 18. Shortly after the beginning of the year (Jan. 9), Jack in the Box announced that it repaid $105 million in debt – specifically its Series 2019-1 4.476% fixed rate senior secured notes, Class A-2-II. The move “reflects the meaningful progress we continue to make toward strengthening our balance sheet and positioning the company for sustainable growth under ‘JACK on Track,’” said CEO Lance Tucker, referring to the campaign to improve the business. “Our efforts to improve long-term financial performance, accelerate cash flow and simplify our company while preserving growth-oriented capital investments are working, and we remain committed to executing against these strategic priorities to deliver value for our shareholders.” The business says it plans to continue to pay down debt through a combination of cash on hand and targeted real estate sales. Jack in the Box announced on Dec. 22 that its sale of Del Taco Holdings Inc. to Northern California-based Yadav Enterprises had closed, bringing in approximately $109 million cash. The remaining $10 million is in the form of a 21-day promissory note. As Jack in the Box works to improve its financial situation, the promotions roll on. One of Jack in the Box’s giveaways this year is a collection of “Jibbi” bag charms – Jack in the Box characters rendered in the popular Japanese-inspired style. The company has also collaborated with The Hundreds, the Los Angeles-area streetwear brand. “The partnership taps into a larger cultural moment where food, fashion and identity are all becoming one, as brands move beyond traditional categories to meet fans where they are,” according to marketing materials.

Read the article

2/2/2026

Investor Engagement Reshapes Appian’s Strategic Landscape

Ad Hoc News (02/02/26)

Appian (NASDAQ: APPN), the enterprise software specialist, faces a pivotal period shaped by two significant developments. The entry of a notable shareholder and a dramatic reversal in a high-stakes legal battle have fundamentally altered the company's outlook. With management now under increased scrutiny, investor attention is zeroing in on the imminent release of the company's annual financial results. Adding a layer of complexity is the recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Virginia in Appian's lawsuit against rival Pegasystems (NASDAQ: PEGA). In early January, the court overturned a previous multi-billion dollar judgment in Appian's favor, ordering a new trial. This decision transforms a potential financial windfall into a long-term uncertainty, complicating investment calculations. Market analysts are divided in their assessment of the company amidst this confluence of events. Barclays maintains a skeptical stance, pointing to Appian's premium valuation relative to peers in the process automation sector. Conversely, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) has recently highlighted the firm's growth potential within the government vertical. All eyes are now on February 19, 2026, when the company is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results before the U.S. markets open. During the subsequent conference call at 14:30 CET, executives must demonstrate that growth in cloud-based subscription revenue meets expectations. Investors will also listen closely for management's 2026 guidance, framed against the new reality of activist pressure. In late January, it was revealed that investment firm Fivespan Partners has accumulated a 6.2% stake in Appian. Such activist engagements typically aim to push for operational improvements or evaluate strategic alternatives, including a potential sale. For Appian's leadership team, this translates to significantly tighter monitoring of their strategic decisions in the coming months. A central question is whether management can simultaneously meet the expectations of this new major shareholder and the broader investor base. The answer will largely depend on the efficiency of the company's progress in integrating automated workflows for enterprise clients—a sector analysts currently deem critically important.

Read the article

1/30/2026

The GameStop CEO Has an Audacious Plan to Clinch His $35 Billion Payday

Wall Street Journal (01/30/26) Thomas, Lauren; Rudegeair, Peter

GameStop (GME) shares have dropped around 80% since the retailer’s reign as king of meme stocks in 2021. Its chairman and chief executive has an ambitious plan to turn that slide around—and has Michael Burry of “The Big Short” fame cheering him on. GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen told The Wall Street Journal in an interview that he is aiming to turn the $11 billion company into a $100 billion-plus juggernaut. This larger company would do much more than just sell video games and collectibles. To do this, he is eyeing a major acquisition of a publicly traded company, likely in the consumer or retail industry, where he has spent most of his career. He has his sights set on a handful of companies that he declined to identify and plans to approach potential targets soon. Any deal will be “big,” the 40-year-old billionaire said. “It’s ultimately either going to be genius or totally, totally foolish.” Cohen co-founded online pet-products retailer Chewy (CHWY) in 2011. He served as its CEO through 2018 after leading the company to an over $3 billion sale to PetSmart. He pivoted to activist investing for a time, agitating for change at companies including Nordstrom (JWN) and Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), where he faced allegations—that he denied—of misleading investors. He said a few years ago he was modeling his strategy after those of Warren Buffett and Carl Icahn, finding undervalued stocks like the former and pressing for change like the latter. Earlier this month, GameStop’s board of directors adjusted Cohen’s compensation package to give him extra incentive to boost the company’s market value and profitability. He stands to make as much as $35 billion in stock if certain criteria are met. Part of the award starts vesting if GameStop’s market value reaches $20 billion and a measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization reaches $2 billion. To get the full award, GameStop’s market value must reach $100 billion and the Ebitda measure must reach $10 billion. More executives have been following the lead of Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, whose multibillion-dollar pay package from 2018 laid the groundwork for other moonshot pay deals. In November, Tesla shareholders approved a fresh record-setting pay deal for Musk that promises as much as $1 trillion in additional stock if certain milestones are reached. “This structure ensures that Mr. Cohen’s incentives are directly aligned with creating long-term value for GameStop’s stockholders,” GameStop said in a filing detailing the changes. Meanwhile, Cohen has been buying up more GameStop shares, including as recently as this month. He now has a stake of over 9% and remains the biggest individual shareholder in the business. The recent changes caught the attention of Burry, the doctor-turned-hedge-fund-manager whose bets against subprime mortgage bonds were chronicled in the Michael Lewis book. Burry closed his fund last year to launch a paid Substack newsletter. Burry wrote earlier this week that the video game retailer should run the Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) playbook and use its giant cash holdings to make transformative acquisitions. Cohen “has a crappy business, and he is milking it best he can while taking advantage of the meme stock phenomenon to raise cash and wait for an opportunity to make a big buy of a real growing cash cow business,” Burry wrote. Burry, a GameStop shareholder, said in the newsletter he bought more stock recently and sees upside in the company should Cohen spend $10 billion or more to acquire a quality business, such as an insurer with plenty of customer premiums to invest. GameStop’s substantial net operating losses, which allow it to offset future taxable income, could also make it an ideal acquirer for many targets, Burry wrote. Cohen told the Journal that he hasn’t spoken to Burry since at least 2019. “He’s one of the few investors I respect,” he said. “He has a track record of making prescient early calls.” Cohen gained a cult following after he built a big GameStop stake and in late 2020 criticized the company for moving too slowly toward e-commerce. He joined GameStop’s board in January 2021, when the business had a market value of a little over $1 billion. He rose to become chairman later that year and vowed to transform the struggling retailer into an e-commerce giant. The stock took off. So-called meme-stock investors poured into GameStop in droves and fueled a massive rally, many with a desire to squeeze out short-selling hedge funds that had bet against the business. GameStop shares reached a high of $120.75 five years ago this week. They closed at $22.81 Thursday. Cohen bristles at the term meme stock, telling the Journal it is “a label people use when they don’t want to do the work” on a stock. “You either create value over time or you don’t,” he said. Cohen said GameStop is finally in a good position to make bolder moves, after recent efforts to sell more collectibles and shut underperforming stores. GameStop has around $9 billion in cash and liquid securities on its balance sheet that could help fund a deal. “There are a lot of diamonds in the rough…that have sleepy management teams,” Cohen said about the retail industry. “I didn’t fix GameStop to stop there.”

Read the article

1/29/2026

How Investors Turned a Toyota Buyout into a Battleground

Reuters (01/29/26) Shiraki, Maki; Leussink, Daniel; Dolan, David; et al.

Toyota's plan to take an affiliate private looked unremarkable at first. Instead, the bid for Toyota Industries (6201.T), or TICO, ignited a battle between investors demanding top dollar and a Japanese corporate culture that prizes stakeholder harmony over shareholder returns. This month, Toyota sweetened its bid by 15% to around $27.8 billion but failed to quell the uprising. Elliott Investment Management said the revised 18,800 yen-a-share offer undervalued TICO by almost 40%, and potentially much more as a standalone entity. The U.S.-based fund, which holds 6.7% of TICO, has attacked the bid as opaque and said it falls short of basic governance standards. Since Toyota announced its initial 16,300 yen-a-share offer in June, Elliott has led the charge for a higher price. The standoff pits Paul Singer's fund, known for extracting big paydays from Argentina and Peru, against the world's largest automaker and its chairman, Akio Toyoda. The 69-year-old grandson of Toyota's founder has a personal stake in the outcome: He's investing about $6.5 million to boost his TICO holding from 0.05% to 0.5% and tighten his grip on the maker of forklifts, engines and RAV4 SUVs. The pushback threatens to upend Toyota's plans to revamp a key affiliate. Elliott has urged investors not to take the offer price, arguing TICO would be worth more independent -- a gambit that could force Toyota to pay significantly more or kill the deal outright. This account of how a routine buyout turned into a corporate battle is based on regulatory filings and interviews with more than two dozen people, including investors and Toyota group executives. It shows how the transaction has become a test case for dealmaking in Japan -- and whether the principle of "sanpo yoshi," which prizes benefits to all stakeholders and society, can withstand pressure from shareholders. "Over the years, Toyota has tended to annoy investors because it doesn't really care about shareholders," said Stephen Codrington, CEO of research firm Codrington Japan. Toyota rejects that view. A representative said the group sees shareholders as important and their support as critical to growth. In an interview with Reuters just before the bid was raised, Masahiro Yamamoto, the automaker's chief risk officer, said it was incorrect to portray talks with shareholders as confrontational. A representative for Toyota Fudosan, the real-estate unit leading the buyout, this week defended the offer, saying it reflected TICO's intrinsic value and represented a premium to historic market prices. A TICO representative said it had taken steps to ensure the bid was transparent, including consulting outside directors and independent firms, and received three fairness opinions. An Elliott spokesperson declined to comment in response to written questions from Reuters. Founded in 1926 as Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, TICO later added an automobile division, spun off as Toyota Motor (7203.T) in 1937. Toyota says it wants to take TICO private to remove the burden of short-term profit targets as the group pivots to connected cars and advanced software. After the deal was announced, TICO shares settled near the offer price, signaling confidence Toyota would succeed. But overseas investors, alarmed by what they saw as opaque financial disclosure and shoddy treatment of minority shareholders, complained to the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) over the summer that the transaction went against its drive to improve governance, two people briefed on the matter said. The TSE had never experienced such "fury" from investors, said one of the people. The exchange declined to comment on the complaints, which haven't been previously reported. In September, TICO shares began to tick higher as investors bet Toyota would bump the price. That conviction deepened when Elliott disclosed its stake in November. Still, Toyota executives gave no sign of budging. Following investor complaints, Kenta Kon, a director at Toyota Fudosan, told other executives that raising the price to appease some shareholders would create a dangerous precedent, according to two people. Kon contended that such a move would amount to "He who speaks the loudest wins," these people said, unfairly rewarding some stakeholders because they created a fuss. In an interview, Kon, who is also the automaker's chief financial officer, told Reuters he didn't recall using that expression. The group had been "careful to ensure that we do not prioritize anyone unfairly," he said. As TICO's shares kept rising, a buoyant market also lifted the value of its cross-shareholdings in other Toyota companies, which investors said made the offer price look less attractive. "They've tried to buy Toyota Industries on the cheap, and now they have to face a bull market in the cross-shareholdings that Toyota Industries holds," said Hugh Sloane, co-founder of Sloane Robinson Investment Management in London, who holds shares in TICO. He doesn't plan to tender his shares, he said. In mid-December, TICO executives wrote to Toyota Fudosan urging it to increase the offer, citing the rising share price, a regulatory filing showed. Toyota Fudosan eventually settled on 18,800 yen, which TICO accepted as final, according to the filing. TICO shares closed at 19,585 yen on Wednesday. Another rationale for the TICO deal is to unwind its holdings in other Toyota companies and better align the group with TSE governance changes intended to improve shareholder value. Yet the backlash has eclipsed previous governance complaints against Toyota. In August, the Asian Corporate Governance Association advocacy group raised concerns about the buyout in a letter to TICO and Toyota signed by some two dozen investors. They cited inadequate financial disclosure and said Toyota group companies shouldn't be classified as minority shareholders, as that lowers the voting threshold Toyota would need to clinch the deal. The Toyota Fudosan representative said the group companies were independent, listed firms that made their own decisions. TICO released more financial details this month. Not everyone views Japan's efforts to prioritize shareholders as entirely positive. Japan risks having its manufacturing prowess eroded by U.S.-style "short-termism and financialization" where quarterly earnings take precedence over long-term investment, said Ulrike Schaede, a professor of Japanese business at University of California San Diego. One executive at a Toyota group company said those complaining about price were chasing quick returns, at odds with the longer-term view typically taken by Japanese companies. A person familiar with Elliott's thinking said the fund had approached the deal with a focus on corporate value and that had resonated with other investors. The Toyota representative said the group recognizes investors may have different investment horizons. Inside the Toyota group, there is a "sense of concern" about Elliott, one person said, adding the automaker hadn't expected the fund to start raising its stake last month. Elliott has been a shareholder in TICO for more than a year, two people said. It first confirmed a 3.3% holding in November, which it has since doubled. In a filing that month, the fund flagged that it could increase its stake to 20% or more.

Read the article

1/29/2026

Proxy-Voting Trends in 2025: Widening Gaps in Asset Manager Voting Preferences

Morningstar (01/29/26) Stewart, Lindsey

Morningstar's latest research paper looks at the proxy-voting patterns of 50 of the largest U.S. managers of equity and allocation funds. The researchers found that as a group, voters at these entities have become more supportive of management over recent years. Average support for management resolutions at companies in the Morningstar U.S. Large-Mid Cap index increased in the 2025 proxy year to just over 96% from close to 95% in the prior two years. The increase was largely driven by greater support for director elections, which make up around 78% of all management resolutions each year. Advisory votes on executive compensation (which comprise around 8% of all management resolutions) consistently attract around 10% shareholder opposition each year on average. However, there has also been a noticeable increase in support for these proposals in the last three proxy years. Meanwhile, over the same period, average support for shareholder resolutions fell. Shareholder proposals on environmental and social themes fared worst, with these bearing the strongest impacts from the SEC’s actions during the year. However, when the top 50 U.S. asset managers were split according to size, the opposite of coordinated activity is observed. In fact, there’s a marked divergence between the voting patterns of the largest 10 US asset managers and the other 40 U.S. managers in the study. The top 10 include the Big Three index managers: BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard, and State Street (STT); plus Capital Group, Dimensional, Fidelity including funds subadvised by Geode, Invesco (IVZ), J.P. Morgan (JPM), Schwab (SCHW), and T. Rowe Price (TROW). Looking first at management resolutions, the top 10 asset managers recorded the strongest increases in support for management resolutions. Average support for management resolutions among the top 10 U.S. managers increased to 97.5% in the 2025 proxy year compared with 97.1% in 2024 and 96.1% in 2023. Among the Big Three index managers, the same trend with higher support levels was observed. On average, the Big Three managers backed 98.7% of management resolutions in the 2025 proxy year, compared with 98.0% in 2024 and 96.0% in 2023. In contrast, the remaining 40 U.S. managers’ average support stood at around 94% to 95% over the past three years, with a slight increase in 2025. In the past three proxy years, average percentage support for shareholder resolutions by the Big Three index managers stood in single digits. In 2025, this number stood at 7.5%, having fallen from around 9.0% in the previous two proxy years. A falling trend in support for the top 10 as a whole was also observed. On average, the 10 firms cast 12.4% of their fund votes in support of shareholder proposals in the 2025 proxy year, down slightly from 13.3% in 2024 and 15.2% in 2025. The other 40 firms’ average support for shareholder resolutions also displayed a falling trend but stood consistently higher than that of the top 10 over the three-year period. In the 2025 proxy year, the 40 firms’ average support for shareholder resolutions was 28.8%, compared with 34.6% in 2024 and 38.2% in 2023. It’s worth also mentioning the differences in voting patterns by sustainable funds and European managers. Both groups show noticeably lower-than-average support for management resolutions, and higher than average support for shareholder resolutions over the last three years. Asset owners rely on proxy-voting records to assess alignment between their own objectives and the asset managers they appoint. The data from Morningstar set out in our paper can help asset owners make that assessment. The clear differences in approach to proxy-voting by asset managers can be a boon to asset owners seeking close alignment between their governance and sustainability priorities and asset managers’ implementation methods. We’ve already seen asset owners in the United States and Europe seek better alignment by shifting mandates, or considering doing so. But with ongoing regulatory and political scrutiny of proxy-voting practices, it remains challenging to contend with the constantly shifting landscape.

Read the article

1/28/2026

Elliott Stands a Chance at Foiling Controversial Toyota Deal

Bloomberg (01/28/26) Takahashi, Nicholas; French, Alice

At first glance, Elliott Investment Management appears to have an insurmountable disadvantage in its campaign to block the business group behind Toyota Motor Corp. (TM) from buying out a key unit in one of Japan’s largest take-private deals of all time. After all, the group already owns about 48% of Toyota Industries Corp. (6201), and holds deep ties with many of the buyout target’s top minority shareholders. Meanwhile, the U.S. fund only has a 6.7% stake — a far cry from what’s needed to scuttle what it describes as a lowball offer before the tender period closes on Feb. 12. So Toyota may look closer to the two-thirds majority required to push through the deal than the 33% of eligible shares Elliott needs to block it, but a closer look indicates billionaire Paul Singer’s fund may not be so far from pulling it off. Elliott may only need the support of an additional 7% of voting shares to win, according to Travis Lundy, an independent analyst who’s been involved in Japanese equities and investor activism for over two decades. That’s because he’s betting passive investors, which hold shares as part of index funds or ETFs and account for about 19% of the voting rights, won’t sell to Toyota at the below-market offer of ¥18,800 a share. Should Elliott prevail, it would go down as one of the biggest victories for shareholder activism in Japan. Such an outcome, which may dilute the founding family’s stronghold on the business empire, is likely to embolden other investors to agitate for changes in the country’s tight-knit business community. “The deal is going in the blockable direction,” Lundy said in an interview. “If you take the combination of what Elliott has, what Elliott might have, what Elliott could do, and what other people have and could do, I would be surprised if this got done at ¥18,800.” The offer values Toyota Industries at ¥6.1 trillion, though Toyota group is seeking to buy the shares it doesn’t own in the unit through a ¥4.3 trillion tender offer bid, which would make it one of the biggest acquisitions of its kind in Japan. When adding a separate transaction tied to the buyout, the group estimates the Toyota Industries privatization would cost ¥5.4 trillion. Elliott declined to comment beyond its public statements, while Toyota Industries said it plans to keep holding sincere talks with all shareholders. Toyota Fudosan Co., which is leading the buyout, said it will continue striving to gain shareholders’ understanding. Toyota Motor declined to comment. Since revealing in November it had taken a stake in Toyota Industries, Elliott has already managed to pressure Toyota to raise its initial offer by 15%. But the fund continues to urge other investors to spurn Toyota, arguing that the shares are worth at least ¥26,000 each and could climb to ¥40,000 in a couple of years if the company were to remain a standalone company. On Tuesday, Elliott stepped up its campaign by issuing a 52-page presentation laying out its case against the deal. The fund is even weighing a counter-bid for Toyota Industries, according to a Nikkei report on Wednesday. It’s a “reasonably safe assumption” that passive investors won’t tender their shares unless Toyota raises its offer above the market price, according to Lundy, who’s based in Hong Kong. Tendering below the market price would present an “asymmetric downside risk” for passive fund managers, whose performance needs to track the broader stock benchmarks, Lundy said. Toyota Industries shares have traded above the offer price since the revised offer and closed at ¥19,855 on Thursday. According to Lundy, passive investors such as BlackRock Inc. (BLK) could boost the Elliott camp’s share of voting rights, which exclude treasury shares, to about 26%. BlackRock declined to comment. Meanwhile, the Toyota camp probably has about 55% of Toyota Industries voting rights “locked up” when counting things such as cross-shareholdings, according to Lundy’s estimates. Still, beating one of the country’s most storied and well-connected conglomerates would be a tall task. “Many investors think there’s little point in trying to resist the Toyota group,” said Masatoshi Kikuchi, an equity strategist at Mizuho Securities Co. While shareholders such as Elliott may protest the price, the deal still has a good chance of going ahead, he said. Toyota Industries counts the country’s public pension fund as well as megabanks and major insurers among its investors, with many of their stakes representing cross-shareholdings. “These institutions are likely to tender their shares, unless the share price rises sustainably above the offer,” said Bloomberg Intelligence senior auto analyst Tatsuo Yoshida. Yet Elliott isn’t alone in balking at the offer. “We find it difficult to regard the proposed price increase as appropriate,” said Kaz Sakai, head of Japan research at UK-based fund Asset Value Investors Ltd. Sakai declined to say whether the fund, which holds about 0.1% of Toyota Industries, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, would tender its shares.

Read the article

1/27/2026

Shareholder Activists Have Better Odds if Big 3 Stop Voting, Says Morningstar

Responsible Investor (01/27/26) Webb, Dominic

Morningstar has said that if the Big 3 asset managers were prevented from voting, activist investors would be more likely to succeed rather than having their chances harmed as some U.S. critics are claiming. The remarks came ahead of the publication of Morningstar’s 2025 review of U.S. proxy voting trends at the just over 500 firms in its large and mid-cap index. The firm analyzed proxy voting records from 50 U.S. firms, eight European and UK managers and 601 U.S. sustainable funds. Across all groups, the findings showed increased support for management resolutions and declining support for environmental and social proposals. The support for management proposals across the 10 largest managers increased to 97.5% in 2025, up 0.4 percentage points on 2024 and 1.4 percentage points on 2023, with support from the remaining 40 firms averaging out at 95%. Turning to shareholder resolutions, Morningstar said that the top 10 asset managers “led opposition” against these proposals, with low backing by these firms leading to a “dampening effect” on overall support levels due to the size of their shareholdings. The Big 3 supported an average of 7.5% of shareholder resolutions, while the top 10 supported 12.4%. The U.S. sustainable funds supported 36.4% of shareholder proposals, while European firms backed 46.7%, a steep drop from their 2024 level of 60.3%. Among the top 50 U.S. firms, seven increased their support for environmental and social proposals. Schwab Asset Management saw the largest increase in support, with its backing rising 13 percentage points, while Northern Trust (NTRS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Janus Henderson (JHG), Parnassus, and Neuberger Berman (NBH) also among those bucking the trend. BlackRock (BLK) also posted a slight increase in support, supporting 3.2% of environmental and social proposals in the sample versus 2.7 in 2024, but it remained in 45th place for overall support. Average support by the 50 managers was down across all ESG subtopics apart from society-related resolutions where average support rose from 30.9% to 34.6%. Governance saw the highest average support, while workplace-related resolutions declined to last place as the managers supported just 10.4% on average. Lindsey Stewart, director of institutional investor content at Morningstar, said that “some critics have claimed that preventing BlackRock, State Street (STT), and Vanguard from voting would lead to less activism at shareholder meetings. “However, our research indicates that these firms are supportive of the market overall, and if they were removed from voting, that would actually increase the probability of a successful activist campaign.” Large passive managers' voting has come under the focus of a number of officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in recent months. Brian Daly, director of the division of investment management, suggested in a speech that “it may be appropriate” for index-tracking funds “to consider whether taking positions on fundamental corporate matters, or on precatory proposals, is consistent with their investment mandates.” Similarly, commissioner Mark Uyeda warned that fund managers which automatically vote based on proxy adviser recommendations may be considered a group with other investors that do so if the aggregate shareholding exceeds 5%. This latter point was picked up by president Donald Trump in an executive order targeting proxy advisers, ordering the SEC to investigate whether and under what circumstances a proxy adviser “serves as a vehicle for investment advisers to co-ordinate and augment their voting decisions,” and whether investors thereby form a group.

Read the article

1/27/2026

A Decade After Campbell’s Soup, Dan Loeb’s Third Point Is Back

Semafor (01/27/26) Goswami, Rohan

Dan Loeb’s Third Point last mounted a proxy fight 10 years ago, delighting shareholders with his biting letters and scorched-earth attacks on management. Now, the investor is ready to mount another campaign, at a real estate giant he says has badly lost its way. Loeb alleges that the “anemic performance” at CoStar Group (NASDAQ: CSGP), the $30 billion company behind Homes.com and a suite of commercial real estate products, “can be ascribed entirely to the misallocation of billions of dollars” into its residential expansion. Loeb reserved particular vitriol for CoStar CEO Andy Florance. “Like an elementary school child who wins a prize even for finishing last, Mr. Florance’s bonuses are perhaps the costliest ‘Participation Award’ our firm has witnessed,” Loeb wrote in a blistering letter to shareholders. Loeb and multi-strategy hedge fund D.E. Shaw had struck a deal to avert a proxy fight last year, but the agreement expired Tuesday at midnight. Now, Loeb wants to replace a majority of CoStar’s board and go after the CEO’s “exorbitant pay packages,” he said. CoStar refutes Loeb’s assertions but says it will continue to engage with Third Point. “Over the past year, CoStar Group has conducted extensive engagement with stockholders to inform our updated strategic vision and capital allocation priorities,” a spokesperson told Semafor. “We intend to continue to engage with our stockholders, including Third Point, to help them better understand our strategic plan, which has already garnered support from many stockholders and analysts.” Loeb’s hardly been in exile — he issued letters about Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) and took positions in US Steel and Kenvue (NYSE: KVUE), both of which were taken over. But his emergence from a bit of proxy-fight hibernation is a bullish signal for activist investors and M&A bankers alike — an indication that the market dislocations of Trump 2.0’s early term are now more digestible and navigable, and that the robust pipeline bankers have been promising might actually start coming to fruition. Bankers have for months now been predicting that 2026 would be a banner year for dealmaking, with Bank of America (BAC) CEO Brian Moynihan telling Semafor last week that “the pipelines are full.” Of course, they also said that about 2024 and 2025, on the cusp of what was expected to be a dealmaking renaissance ushered in by U.S. President Trump’s laissez-faire approach to antitrust enforcement. But activist presence is one of the top catalysts for M&A. That’s certainly true here, where Loeb is looking for CoStar to get out of a major business altogether. Should more activists come out of the woodwork, bankers’ M&A dreams may finally, durably come closer to reality. Most of the big deals seen last year were generational, now-or-never pieces of M&A. If anything, the environment has gotten muddier for CEOs looking to do big deals, with disruption in Europe and trade continuing. As the U.S. midterm elections near, and the president refines his focus on affordability, some form of Trump-style antitrust enforcement may come back into vogue and potentially derail deals.

Read the article

1/25/2026

Canadian Companies Growing Wary Amid Increased Interest in Takeovers, Bank of America Exec Says

Globe and Mail (01/25/26) Marotta, Stefanie

Canadian companies are increasingly discerning between friendly and predatory investment as a weaker dollar and lower rates make domestic companies more attractive to foreign buyers, according to Bank of America’s (BAC) head of Canadian investment banking. The Canadian dollar has weakened against its U.S. counterpart in recent years, and interest rates are relatively low compared with global peers, spurring interest in takeovers of domestic companies. Last year, Canada was the third-largest target for cross-border merger and acquisition activity, behind the United States and Britain, according to Deep Khosla, head of Canadian investment banking at Bank of America. The bank’s large defensive advisory business on Bay Street is helping clients “to be ready if there’s an activist or anybody trying to make an opportunistic bid for a company,” Mr. Khosla said in an interview. “That's something that we've been spending a lot of time on and taking that defensive posture and making sure that's covered so our clients can go on offence and start to be more of the acquirers.” At the same time, rising geopolitical tension has triggered alarm bells in Ottawa over foreign investment and shareholder activism. In March, 2025, the federal government increased its power to block foreign investments in Canadian companies. The decision followed a move from the United States to enact sweeping tariffs on goods from Canada. The new guidelines determine when a foreign investment could come under a national-security review. They were updated to include “the potential of the investment to undermine Canada's economic security.” Last year, Canadian companies attracted some major U.S. investors. Mr. Khosla said shareholder activism has started edging higher in Canada. “Activism is very prevalent in the United States right now. It has not been as frequent in Canada, but it's picking up and so we're all about not being reactive, but proactively getting ready in case that call comes,” Mr. Khosla said. Last year, Bank of America advised Calgary fuel distributor Parkland Corp. on its sale to Dallas-based Sunoco LP (SUN) valued at US$9.1 billion, which started as a friendly takeover bid. The deal also ended a battle with Parkland's largest shareholder, Simpson Oil Ltd. To help pay down its debt, Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) closed a deal in June to sell a minority stake in its wireless infrastructure for $7 billion to a consortium led by New York-based Blackstone Inc. that includes four of Canada's largest pension plans. Mr. Khosla said the transaction was a friendly deal that Rogers actively sought out. Bank of America is one of 16 U.S. lenders that operates in Canada. U.S.-based bank subsidiaries and branches in Canada collectively hold about $113 billion in assets, according to the Canadian Bankers Association. The bank has been growing its Canadian team, with 1,000 employees in offices in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Calgary. Last year, it hired more than 140 employees across its business, including markets, operations and technology. “The investment that Bank of America makes in Canada is representative of our view of the Canadian market,” the bank's Canada president, Drew McDonald, said in an interview. “It shows our long commitment to the country and we're proud of our employee base and the fact that we regularly expand and hire a lot of people.”

Read the article

1/23/2026

Commentary: Elliott's Toyota Bet Already Looks Golden

Reuters Breakingviews (01/23/26) Lockett, Hudson

Hudson Lockett, columnist for Reuters Breakingviews, writes that Elliott has picked the right target, the right opponent, the right argument and the right time with its challenge to insiders’ $36 billion bid to take Toyota Industries (6201.T). Having helped successfully press Akio Toyoda and other Toyota group insiders for a higher offer, Elliott Investment Management led by Paul Singer has now upped its stake in Industries to about 6.7%, according to a disclosure on Thursday. The move underscores that there is more to gain from this campaign in Japan than just return on investment. The shareholding of nearly 7% recalls a similar stake taken by Elliott in its bid to block an intergroup merger at Samsung in 2015. While shareholders narrowly waved through that deal after the South Korean group sent them fruit baskets, the environment for activism today in Japan appears more evolved. With its latest bet, Elliott is already winning: the take-private consortium, which includes Toyota Motor (7203.T) and unlisted real-estate firm Toyota Fudosan, raised their proposal by 15% last week to 18,800 yen per share. Back-of-the-envelope maths suggest Elliott paid around 16,650 yen per share across September and October for its original stake of 5.01%. That shakes out to a cost of purchase of around 255 billion yen, about $1.6 billion at current exchange rates. Even at the revised offer price, that would amount to a return of about 33 billion yen on the activist's initial stake. But as of Friday afternoon in Tokyo, shares in Industries were trading at 19,600 yen, 4% above the tender offer price. That represents a potential barrier to insiders’ deal: if minority shareholders want to cash out their shareholdings, they would do much better to sell into the market if they can find buyers than take the tender offer. A Breakingviews estimate suggests the consortium's higher offer still undervalues its target by 39%. Elliott can’t take sole credit for share price resistance, nor for the revised tender offer. An open letter in August from the Asian Corporate Governance Association flagged obvious deficiencies in the deal. The U.S. fund, though, is due recognition for doubling down on its bet. Even if the tender is successful at the current offer price, a larger stake could play to Elliott's advantage in court by bolstering its claim to speak on behalf of minority shareholders. Either way, the fund will have still broken new ground as an activist in Japan by taking on an iconic conglomerate and proven itself a trustworthy partner to other minority shareholders—as well as banking a return. That makes a bigger stake well worth the cost.

Read the article

1/23/2026

Insight: Shareholder Proposal Reform Must Center on Facts, Not Philosophy

Bloomberg Law (01/23/26) Cunningham, Lawrence

Lawrence A. Cunningham, presiding director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, writes that nearly all constituencies in corporate governance—shareholders, directors, and professionals—agree on one thing: The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) handling of shareholder proposals isn’t working. A recent large-scale survey reveals broad dissatisfaction with the agency’s administration of Rule 14a-8, citing unpredictability, opacity, and inconsistent application of standards. That consensus spans groups that otherwise disagree over the legitimacy of certain proposals. The problem isn’t just philosophical polarization—it’s institutional design. This matters because the SEC is signaling a willingness to reconsider its role under Rule 14a-8. At stake is a fundamental question: Should a federal securities regulator continue to referee disputes that often turn on corporate governance, or should greater responsibility rest with the states that traditionally oversee internal corporate affairs? The debate has gained new salience, yet much of the public discussion remains abstract, dominated by anecdote and ideology. The survey data offer a more grounded starting point. First, dissatisfaction with the current process is nearly universal. Even those who favor shareholder activism agree that the SEC’s no-action system has for many years been unpredictable and costly. That convergence suggests reform should focus less on proposals’ merits and more on how the process works. Second, the data distinguish areas of consensus from genuine dispute. Traditional governance proposals—on voting rights, board accountability, or takeover defenses—are widely viewed as legitimate. By contrast, environmental and social proposals provoke sharp disagreement—not only about outcomes but also about the proper scope of shareholder involvement. Yet even here, respondents often agree on underlying principles: materiality, feasibility, and a connection to firm-specific business concerns. Third, cost asymmetry looms large. Submitting a proposal is cheap; responding can be expensive. That imbalance shapes perceptions of fairness and effectiveness, especially among directors. Whether seen as a necessary feature of shareholder voice or a distortion of incentives, it underscores that Rule 14a-8 now carries consequences well beyond disclosure. Finally, the system is often misunderstood as shareholder democracy. In reality, most proposals never reach a vote—they’re withdrawn or blocked through no-action relief. Of those that do reach the ballot, most fail. That’s not a flaw; it reflects corporate law’s design. Corporations aren’t democracies but hierarchical institutions where boards exercise plenary authority and shareholders have limited, episodic rights. Federal proxy rules were meant to complement that structure, not replace it. The survey’s findings give concrete details on what might otherwise sound like an abstract federalism debate. Shareholder proposals increasingly require judgments about authority, fiduciary duty, and the boundaries between shareholder input and board discretion—questions traditionally addressed under state law. Yet the SEC remains responsible for administering a process embedded in federal proxy rules, using tools developed for a disclosure-oriented mandate. The survey also points to a third option: private ordering. Many respondents favor letting companies set their own rules for shareholder proposals in bylaws and charters, subject to disclosure and fiduciary duties—flexibility long embraced in Delaware law. The survey doesn’t dictate a single solution. Reasonable observers differ on whether clearer federal standards, greater deference to state law, or some hybrid approach would best improve predictability and legitimacy. But the data make clear that the status quo satisfies few participants and that reform discussions should begin with how the system actually operates rather than caricatures of activism or reflexive defenses of existing arrangements. If the SEC proceeds with reconsidering its role, it can reframe the debate in practical terms. The question isn’t whether shareholder proposals should exist, but how they should function—and which institutions should make the judgments the system now requires. Any durable reform, federal or state, must reckon with those realities. The goal should be a process that is predictable, transparent, and aligned with corporate law’s allocation of authority—while enabling private ordering for companies that seek tailored solutions. Getting this right matters. Shareholder proposals shape corporate priorities, imposing real costs while also offering potential benefits—tradeoffs that remain sharply contested. Reform should start with facts, not philosophies.

Read the article